It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BOOM: Burisma Plead With US State Dept For Help, Invoked Hunter Biden

page: 3
74
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2019 @ 11:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite

Burisma lobbied the US to stop a criminal investigation into them invoking hunter biden by name. Then, about a month later joe biden threatened to withhold $1b in aid to achieve exactly that.


Boom. Full stop. Leftists please defend your sanity by acknowledging the Biden two-step boogie.




posted on Nov, 4 2019 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

I think every state will be RED for the 2020 election. Even Hawaii. Lots of blood-curdling things will be exposed over the next 11 months, or so. Most committed by Democrats. But there will be Republicans named too. It's be bi-partisan, lol.



posted on Nov, 4 2019 @ 11:52 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I felt that way until november 2018. Whether the american people are so dumb they actually gave dems the house, just 30 days after the kavanaugh BS or whether the dems have legalized and perfected voter fraud well enough to steal it. The result is the same. It's going to be a close race.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite




Burisma lobbied the US to stop a criminal investigation into them invoking hunter biden by name.

Is that in the email chain?
I see a request for a meeting about why Burisma was tagged.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

LOL never change.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Back atcha'.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:18 AM
link   
the best part is... the Biden/Burisma corruption is starting to show links to the 2016 Election interference.

Challupa and other Ukrainian officials worked with the DNC/Steel Dossier and also with Biden/Burisma at some capacity.

The 2 become linked and all part of the 1 investigation.
The Democrats are hoping their ''impeachment sham'' will allow them a blanket of ''This is under investigation and cannot be commented on''



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:23 AM
link   
So Burisma is a bogus company whos sole purpose was to launder bribe monies and kickbacks... A shell company. reply to: Dfairlite



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shawmanfromny

The clip is hilarious. Joe Biden spoke to the wall behind him for almost 2 full minutes in Iowa on Saturday. And, he thought he was in Ohio.


“Front runner”


Is that like front bottom?

if you get my drift...



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Bigbrooklyn
They probably did sell some gas. It was the owner who was the problem.

But the British money-laundering investigation was stymied by Ukrainian prosecutors’ refusal to cooperate. The Ukrainian prosecutors would not turn over documents needed in the British investigation, and without that documentary evidence, a British court ordered Britain’s Serious Fraud Office to unfreeze the assets.

theintercept.com...

The Ukraine prosecutor did not cooperate with the British investigation of Zlochevsky.

edit on 11/5/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Bigbrooklyn

No. It was a legit energy company. Privat Bank was the money laundering operation. Also owned by the guy that owned burisma. Of course, burisma probably did plenty of laundering too. But privat bank was the main money laundering operation.
edit on 5-11-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite




Of course, burisma probably did plenty of laundering too.

Why do you say that?



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

That intercept article is wrong on many fronts. See the guardian article in the OP. One prosecutor did try to work with the british investigation, but he was back stabbed by someone higher up. The prosecutor sent a letter to the UK investigator who submitted it to the court so they could freeze zlochevsky's accounts.




When Kasko read the judge’s ruling, he had questions, but of a rather different nature. At the hearing, the tycoon’s lawyers had not just attacked the case against their client, but also produced evidence of his innocence, evidence that came from the unlikeliest of sources. Justice Blake’s 21-page judgment made reference half a dozen times to a letter, dated 2 December 2014, signed by someone in the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office, which stated baldly that Zlochevsky was not suspected of any crime.

Kasko felt this was bizarre. Everyone in a senior position at the prosecutor’s office must have known he was leading a frenzied investigation into Zlochevsky at that precise time, so how could anyone have signed off on a letter saying that no investigation was going on? The letter appeared to be crucial to the judge’s ruling, which stated that Zlochevsky “was never named as a suspect for embezzlement or indeed any other offence, let alone one related to the exercise of improper influence in the grant of exploration and production licenses”.

As Kasko saw it, his colleagues had failed to help him when he begged them to investigate Zlochevsky. But when it came to writing a letter to help the tycoon, he believed they had happily done so.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:41 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Because they deposited their $1.5B in aid money that disappeared into privat bank. So it was all part of the same laundering operation. I would assume this aid money had kickbacks tied to it. If you could trace the money exactly biden's kid was likely receiving his money (over 3 million total) from our aid to ukraine that went through burisma and privat bank.
edit on 5-11-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Zlochevsky settled this out of court it didn't just go away because the persecutor changed. Everything this current on going investigation is about was from before Biden joined the board and is about Zlochevsky specifically not the company- the man
Shokin was a Russian stooge that's why US and EU wanted him removed. All of that is besides the point because nobody ever doubted that Zlochevsky was/is corrupt money laundering etc.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite


Kasko a deputy prosecutor under Shokin, the Prosecutor General.

Yes. Kasko was pissed about Shokin's refusal to prosecute Zlochevsky or to assist with the British investigation.

Shokin is the one who was fired. Sounds like it was for good reason.

edit on 11/5/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple




Zlochevsky settled this out of court it didn't just go away because the persecutor changed.

No he didn't. The Brits had to release the cash because Shokin would not help them with the case.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

hmmm, let me check.

March 2014: hunter biden and devon archer appointed to burisma board.
November 2014: Obama admin gives burisma 1.8B in aid
Jan 2015: Burisma deposits 1.8B into privat bank
Mar 2015: 1.8B lost from privat bank
Feb 2016: Zlochevsky (owner of burisma and privat bank) has assets frozen
Feb 2016: burisma reaches out to state dept, sets up meeting
Mar 2016: devon archer meets with Sec of State, john kerry
Mar 2016: Biden forces removal of prosecutor general

Yeah, that's a hard: WRONG on your part. Maybe go back to the drawing board for some confirmation bias.

edit on 5-11-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Shokin claims otherwise. However, I can totally see shokin being in on the burisma scam and not prosecuting but then becoming jaded because he was fired by the people he was protecting. So what does he do? Exposes their crimes. Whether shokin is corrupt or not, is not really material if we have the evidence (which is mounting) that there was a bunch of corruption with biden/burisma/privat bank.

ETA:
Could it be that shokin was playing both sides? On the one hand protecting them from aggressive prosecution, on the other letting this underling compile evidence on them. Then when the demand comes to fire this underling, he refuses (because why give up your leverage), so biden gets involved and fires shokin? Seems plausible, but just a spitball theory.
edit on 5-11-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 12:54 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

1.

www.independentsentinel.com...

2.

3.

www.theblaze.com...

4.

www.dailywire.com...

5.

www.breitbart.com...


Looks like your theory just was DEBUNKED good luck with TDS sorry your Hiliarhea morphed into it.

5 Headlines right thereabout democraps getting arrested (well one video about that creepy old dude buck)

Guess your ree has been disproven so will you own it or just sillily disapear?




top topics



 
74
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join