It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Yusef Estes transform in to a Reptilian - Was David Icke right?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 06:35 AM
link   


What do you think? Is it real or not? Is he a reptilian?




posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 06:50 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

Come now. Which do you think is more likely: this guy is a shape shifting reptilian in part of a world conspiracy... or it's some sort of camera or video encoding / decoding issue?



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 06:55 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

the clip is obviously shot infront of a live audience - why did they spot nothing ?



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

All I see is a poor attempt at superimposing an image into a video. If this guy is revealing his alien face, why aren't all those people in the audience running away screaming ?



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 07:04 AM
link   
a reply to: hombero

possibly an encoding issue and a reptilian conspiracy.

Who knows



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 07:10 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

Your question. Was David Icke right.
My response. No.

Encoding issues, pixilation or fakery do not make alien reptilians appear.


edit on 2-11-2019 by Kurokage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 07:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: DAVID64
why aren't all those people in the audience running away screaming ?



because they did not have their raybans



Video in OP is pretty poor IMO, looks like a high school first attempt at super imposing
edit on 2-11-2019 by UpIsNowDown because: vid link



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 08:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: AtlantisWasReal


What do you think? Is it real or not? Is he a reptilian?



You're new, so we'll cut you some slack. Wiki-anything or YT are not considered "proof"...and Icke is a sham, liar and fraud...so...



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 09:44 AM
link   
The codec that is compressing this video is using "Block Frame Replacement" on a very low quality video signal. This technique concentrates only on areas of the video that change, frame for frame, and updates those blocks of the frame that have changed. SInce the video signal is of such low quality, the BFR glitches when updating his head and hand, since they are pretty much the only things moving. The glitches produce random garbage. Textbook.
edit on 2-11-2019 by charlyv because: spelling , where caught



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   
First thing to do when it's about photo or video is to search for the original source.

Without that first step done, it's totally useless to "analyze" anything, especially that comes from YT...



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

It's totally confirmed, bad CGI and poor video editing are walking among us, this evidence must be reported to the UN.

People stopped falling for these videos since YouTube started, I can't believe people still make them.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: elevenaugust
First thing to do when it's about photo or video is to search for the original source.

Without that first step done, it's totally useless to "analyze" anything, especially that comes from YT...

I don't quite understand the logical consistency of that. You say everyone should ignore possible video evidence of something paranormal if it has been uploaded to YouTube. Why's that? What difference does it make to reliability if you watch a video uploaded by someone you don't know or watch a video posted to you by someone who included lots of biographical details about themselves in the accompanying letter? They could still have hoaxed their video however much they tell you about themselves. What use, therefore, is knowing the "source" in order to evaluate whether a video is genuine or not?

As YouTube attracts hoaxers, all videos it contains about the paranormal must be considered possible CGI (even if never actually proven subsequently). But this can happen with any website site that plays videos that have been submitted to them. Like the BBC and some newspapers, for example. What source would you accept? By turning the issue of possible evidence for paranormal things into a question of what is reliable and acceptable a priori and what is not, you have introduced a subjective element into the scientific assessment of whether a video actually counts as evidence. Your standards and judgement may not be acceptable to someone else and other people might reject what to you is a trustworthy source. But, by insisting that YOUR choice of source decides whether everyone can decide whether the video in question is genuine or whether it is CGI, you give yourself permission to ignore EVERYTHING that comes from any source YOU dislike, like YouTube. When was scientific truth established by OPINIONS? Hoaxers can send their videos to anyone. The source itself cannot guarantee reliability. Why, therefore, do you insist on knowing who made the video, when that can tell you nothing concerning whether it contains CGI?

If you insist on advising everyone not to trust YouTube videos, then you ought to tell them not to trust any source, as knowing it cannot decide the paranormality of video evidence. We cannot trust a video merely because the website hosting it is "respectable," because that guarantees nothing these days. Nor, for that matter, can we wait until you have given your approval about where some video came from/who made it before we are permitted to make our own judgements.
edit on 2-11-2019 by micpsi because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: micpsi

YouTube and Wiki-anything usually are not accepted as source material in universities. They are user-generated.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 11:11 PM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

Reptilians would no longer need to hide. A SJW campaign promoting Reptilians as our misunderstood friends would suffice to get most of the sheep in line.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 12:00 AM
link   
Never been a believer in the reptilian stuff though I once saw a Russian? Video of a woman with reptilian eyes



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 01:19 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal

david icke is getting old and his eye must be going. i can remember a time he could cut a video and paste a still in and never leave the borders exposed. pitiful.

don't fall the obvious fake stuff. there are much better fakes out there that look real compared to this.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 04:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: AtlantisWasReal


What do you think? Is it real or not? Is he a reptilian?





is that it?



a YouTube video and 1 line consisting of 3 questions?

I have 3 of my own


Do you have a brain?

Does it work?

Can you share any thoughts your (maybe) working brain has?



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 05:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: AtlantisWasReal
What do you think? Is it real or not? Is he a reptilian?


Are you serious?? Why are so many gullible, weak minded people still pushing this bullsh*t ‘reptilian’ bollocks??

No, he isn’t a ‘reptilian’. It’s a video codec issue resulting in artefacts in the video image.

Good Christ. It’s like watching cavemen hide in bushes when lightning flashes!



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 05:30 AM
link   
a reply to: AtlantisWasReal




What do you think? Is it real or not? Is he a reptilian?

No.
As is always the way with these videos the answer is in the downscaled video quality.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 06:23 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

The methods are probably different. Maybe it's a mind trick used in real life, and some kind of technology used to protect against cameras. :0



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join