It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Elizabeth Warren’s $52 trillion healthcare plan would obliterate the economy

page: 3
24
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Wrong on all counts.




posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 09:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Wrong on all counts.


Wrong for asking what you are claiming is a lie?

Sounds about right! Nice post with lots of substance!

Going to get pretty silly around here this year.....

Lolz🤪



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Warren is crazy, there is no way you can tax the wealthy like that. They are not paper rich, they are asset rich. It would require her to confiscate their assets and stocks. Sounds like communism to me.

Only way to tax them is when they sell their assets are stocks then you can hit them with capital gains. OTherwise, just stealing it outright sounds crazy and like communism.

In the end she will have to tax the middle class, because they are the ones where money is flowing.

And when she does expect your taxes to reach pass 50%. When that happens there will be pitches and forks at her door.
edit on 2-11-2019 by ambassado12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 10:05 AM
link   
Warrens healthcare plan cares as much about peoples health as AOC's Green New Deal plan cares about the environment.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Nothing I have claimed is a lie.

Make an argument get a response.

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ketsuko

Where does money come from in the United States?


It grows on trees



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 10:42 AM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem

You'd think right?



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 11:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: visitedbythem

You'd think right?


I live in California!



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem

Lol.

I need me some of them trees.




posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Nothing I have claimed is a lie.

Make an argument get a response.

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.


You claim that the original subject of the op was based on lies.

What part?

The $53,000,000,000,000?

You make stupid claims like the op was a lie, you get called out for it!


Lolz🤪



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:02 PM
link   
This is over a ten year period. Guess how much we're going to spend in the next ten years? $50 trillion dollars.

If you ask me, which you didn't, $200 million extra per year to cover every American AND ensure no one can go bankrupt due to healthcare costs? Sounds like a sweet deal to me.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:06 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

Every medical employee (incl the VA) salary would have to be cut 50% so they can afford the lower tax rate 😎

There it's figured out now 😎



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:19 PM
link   
There isn't 52 trillion dollars in the economy, to take it from in the first place. The first year you're 37 trillion in the hole right off the bat, plus the 20 trillion debt; you're at negative 57 trillion AND ACCRUING INTEREST...

Anyone who can do basic math can clearly see what a joke the whole idea is.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I don't think you understand how tax rates work.

Either way, shifting $50 trillion in existing costs to $52 trillion for more coverage and cheaper health spending is a good idea.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
There isn't 52 trillion dollars in the economy, to take it from in the first place. The first year you're 37 trillion in the hole right off the bat, plus the 20 trillion debt; you're at negative 57 trillion AND ACCRUING INTEREST...

Anyone who can do basic math can clearly see what a joke the whole idea is.



If Warren's plan was as described, you are correct.

It is not. It is also not a good plan, but it's not what some are making it out to be.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: links234

Every medical employee (incl the VA) salary would have to be cut 50% so they can afford the lower tax rate 😎

There it's figured out now 😎



You're still 49.9 trillion short.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Scepticaldem

It was.

Most of it.

You haven't called anyone out for anything. You've typed words that are meaningless.



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: xuenchen

I don't think you understand how tax rates work.

Either way, shifting $50 trillion in existing costs to $52 trillion for more coverage and cheaper health spending is a good idea.


Yeah I kinda do understand how tax rates work 😃



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: links234

Every medical employee (incl the VA) salary would have to be cut 50% so they can afford the lower tax rate 😎

There it's figured out now 😎



You're still 49.9 trillion short.


The real estimates say $32.77 trillion short !! 😃



posted on Nov, 2 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: links234

Every medical employee (incl the VA) salary would have to be cut 50% so they can afford the lower tax rate 😎

There it's figured out now 😎



You're still 49.9 trillion short.


The real estimates say $32.77 trillion short !! 😃


Tomato (long a), tomato (short a).



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join