It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Timeline of Trump Extorting a Foreign Country for Election Interference

page: 9
23
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Scepticaldem

originally posted by: Extorris
a reply to: Justoneman

Best described as a Libertarian of old before the party was corrupted by the GOP. He also had a profound interest in the virtues of Free Speech.


So who are you backing in 2020?



Haven't decided yet.




posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.


Making a succession of false statements does not make them true.

All of the evidence, public reporting from the time and statements BEFORE the recent wingnut Propaganda started about Biden, thoroughly contradict your unsupported claims.

BTW, You never did answer my questions about Trump and how you say he is the most corrupt prez ever.
Prove it.



That is what Impeachment Trials are for.
You seem impatient.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Extorris

Lieutenant Colonel Vindman has spent his entire life in service of this country and carries shrapnel from Iraq inside his body.

His patriotism and loyalty is not subject to be questioned by those who cower and shirk duty via pretend bone spurs or those who admire and defend the same corrupt cowardice.


And he is still a lying pos. Don't hide behind his accomplishments... Similar people have been found to be spies working for other nations, including Cuba.



So much hate.

I find your claims the fringe of a failing propaganda team that starts with little credibility to begin with desperately flailing to defend Trump and his indefensible disdain for the constitution, rule of law and American ideals.

Prideful lies.

Tell me again how the Call Summary released was a full and literal transcript.


originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

Yes it was the full transcript. You are believing the same people whom for 3 years claimed "they had 100% evidence that POTUS Trump colluded with Russia..."



edit on 3-11-2019 by Extorris because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.


Making a succession of false statements does not make them true.

All of the evidence, public reporting from the time and statements BEFORE the recent wingnut Propaganda started about Biden, thoroughly contradict your unsupported claims.

Yeah whatever, same goes for you. Do some homework.


I have done my homework, posted a dozen links from a decade ago to present.

Now support your BS.

I'll wait for links.



originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Extorris

Lieutenant Colonel Vindman has spent his entire life in service of this country and carries shrapnel from Iraq inside his body.

His patriotism and loyalty is not subject to be questioned by those who cower and shirk duty via pretend bone spurs or those who admire and defend the same corrupt cowardice.


And he is still a lying pos. Don't hide behind his accomplishments... Similar people have been found to be spies working for other nations, including Cuba.


And just because it's like this cartoon was made for you




posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 07:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

That is what Impeachment Trials are for.
You seem impatient.


Not when such impeachment is nothing but a farce. 2 Democrats and all Republicans voted against the impeachment. Pelosi said in March that she would only do impeachment if it was a bipartisan agreement. The bipartisan agreement is not to impeach the POTUS over LIES...



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Extorris

ROFLMAO... Ironic since it is people like you whom want to have no borders in the U.S. and want to do away with our sovereignty...

Since day one you have been one of them whom have been calling wolf about "impeach Trump for this, and this, and this, and this, and this..." All of them lies made up by the left.



All which were LIES you were more than willing to accept...


edit on 3-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

2 Democrats and all Republicans voted against the impeachment.


It wasn't a vote for impeachment.

It was a vote for the rules of the actual impeachment process.

Which included conditions Republicans have been crying that they wanted in the process, then they didn't even vote for what they have been crying that they wanted.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

It wasn't a vote for impeachment.

It was a vote for the rules of the actual impeachment process.

Which included conditions Republicans have been crying that they wanted in the process, then they didn't even vote for what they have been crying that they wanted.


Really? is that why the lying sack of Schiff told witnesses not to answer certain questions by Republicans?... Because you want to claim socialists/democrats have given, or want to give equal powers to Republicans?...

Socialists/democrats have not given subpoena power to Republicans, so the lefties can continue telling witnesses "don't respond those questions."

BTW, it is still an illegal impeachment, since you even admitted this latest vote wasn't about whether to approve or not impeachment...

Your leftist leaders don't want due process because they know they don't have crap on POTUS Trump. He has committed no crime except go against the socialist globalists you love so much...




edit on 3-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.


Making a succession of false statements does not make them true.

All of the evidence, public reporting from the time and statements BEFORE the recent wingnut Propaganda started about Biden, thoroughly contradict your unsupported claims.

Yeah whatever, same goes for you. Do some homework.


I have done my homework, posted a dozen links from a decade ago to present.

Now support your BS.

I'll wait for links.



originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.


I did a few weeks ago and a couple of times. Do your homework.



That is what Impeachment Trials are for. You seem impatient.

Interesting, you seem so sure about things you don’t even know. Yet, you talk down to members that have a different take on things than you do. Truth be known, you don’t know jack besides the propaganda they feed you which you regurgitate as truth, pitiful.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 08:37 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


Really?


Yes, really.



BTW, it is still an illegal impeachment, since you even admitted this latest vote wasn't about whether to approve or not impeachment...


Again, this vote was not an impeachment vote but a vote on the rules for the process.

Again, as stated, it is legal. The court said so. Federal Judge Rules Impeachment Inquiry Is Legal

Just because you keep saying it isn't, doesn't make it so.
edit on 3-11-2019 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

Yes, really.


Prove that democrats have given subpoena power to Republicans. Otherwise you are just blowing hot air.


originally posted by: Liquesence
Again, this vote vote was not an impeachment vote but a vote on the rules for the process.

Again, as stated, it is legal. The court said so. Federal Judge Rules Impeachment Inquiry Is Legal

Just because you keep saying it isn't, doesn't make it so.


Just because one liberal/never Trump judge says it doesn't make it so. More so when liberals, including judges, have been making judgements against the law time and again. Such as in New York they passed a bill in which they can deny due process, such as double jeopardy, to anyone with ties to POTUS Trump...

To protect against Trump pardons, New York enacts double jeopardy law

This is unConstitutional, you can't deny rights to just certain people because of their political leanings, or because of whom they know...






edit on 3-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 08:51 PM
link   
BTW, that federal judge you are puting all your faith on is an Obama appointee... Obama did break REAL laws, he even wrote and passed laws without Congress approval, which is unConstitutional as only Congress can write laws and the POTUS can only sign in favor or against them, but not write them...

Beryl A. Howell Appointed by Barack Obama



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


Prove that democrats have given subpoena power to Republicans.

I never made that claim, nor said anything about subpoena power.
But:



ust because one liberal/never Trump judge says it doesn't make it so


Do you know how judicial rulings work?


More so when liberal judges have been making judgements against the law time and again


But rulings are ok when a conservative judge rules on something?
Spare me your BS.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 09:05 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse



BTW, that federal judge you are puting all your faith on is an Obama appointee...


So the only rulings that are legally valid or Constitutional are those made by those who are appointed by the party upon which they were appointed and upon which their supports agree? Everything else is invalid, if it's not my partisanship?



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 09:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

Again, without giving republicans subpoena power Schiff, and the other socialist/authoritarians can tell witnesses not to respond certain questions. It also doesn't give them the right to bring their own witnesses if Schiff and the other chairs deny certain witnesses from appearing.

BTW, that picture you just gave makes my point.

Notice that under: "Enables effective public hearings" right at the end it states:




...as has been true at every step of the inquiry.
...


Since Schiff has told witnesses not to respond to questions from Republicans he/they don't want witnesses to answer, and since in that resolution socialists/democrats lie claiming they have given these rights to Republicans throughout the impeachment sham, it is obvious these lying sacks of Schiffs plan on continuing to deny due process...






edit on 3-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

They have subpoena power, under what was passed, that the Republicans voted against.




BTW, that picture you just gave makes my point.


Not really.


...as it has been true at every step of the inquiry.


Spin it as you wish. It has been true and it's lawful.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 10:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.


Making a succession of false statements does not make them true.

All of the evidence, public reporting from the time and statements BEFORE the recent wingnut Propaganda started about Biden, thoroughly contradict your unsupported claims.

Yeah whatever, same goes for you. Do some homework.


I have done my homework, posted a dozen links from a decade ago to present.

Now support your BS.

I'll wait for links.



originally posted by: mtnshredder
a reply to: Wardaddy454

There’s a lot of info out there about the fired prosecutor not being corrupt as they want us to believe.
Matter of fact it was quite to the contrary.
The prosecutor that took his place even said as much as did some of the Americans in the know.






Now we have new evidence that Bidens sons company, Burisma, own defense attorneys show not only was the investigation ongoing after the prosecutor was fired, but they tried to set up a meeting with the new interim prosecutor the day the old one was fired, and did meet with him a week later These defense attorneys for Burisma admitted that Shokin, the fired prosecuotr, was not corrupt, and in fact was investigating Burisma very hard. And they apologized that us officials were spreading disinofrmation about Shokin Thats Bidens own sons companies lawyers, saying Biden lied, shokin was not corrupt.




three Americans offered an apology for the “false” narrative that had been provided by U.S. officials about Shokin being corrupt and inept.





They realized that the information disseminated in the U.S. was incorrect and that they would facilitate my visit to the U.S. for the purpose of delivering the true information to the State Department management,” the memo stated. The memo also quoted the Americans as saying they knew Shokin pursued an aggressive corruption investigation against Burisma’s owner, only to be thwarted by British allies: “These individuals noted that they had been aware that the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine had implemented all required steps for prosecution … and that he was released by the British court due to the underperformance of the British law enforcement agencies.”




You get that? Burisma, Bidens sons company that was being investigated, had its own lawyers meet with the new prosecutors one week after Shokin (the prosecutor biden had fired) was fired. They told the new prosecutor that US officals (Biden and company) were spreading lies about Shokin being corrupt, and that actually Shokin was aggressively investigated Bursimas owner. That meas Biden lied. So now we know Biden had the prosecutor looking into his osn fired, and Bidens sons companies own laywers say the reaosn biden gave for getting tha guy was a lie. SO why isnt there an investigation into Biden again? the media lied about this since 2016. They said the investigation into Bursima was over when biden had the prosecutor fire; that was a lie. We know that Bidens sons companies own lawyers say Biden lied aboutr Shokin being corrupt.


[url]https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

Subject to The Chair "approval" or full Committee vote which might be a moot point 😃



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 10:39 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Subject to the approved rules and the Constitution.



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join