It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Time is a constant.
Einstein's theory of relativity states that time and space are not as constant as everyday life would suggest. He suggested that the only true constant, the speed of light, meant that time can run faster or slower depending on how high you are, and how fast you are travelling.
A physical constant, sometimes fundamental physical constant or universal constant, is a physical quantity that is generally believed to be both universal in nature and have constant value in time.
The term mathematical constant usually refers to some particular number whose value is fixed by purely mathematical definition. Common examples are e and π.
A mathematical constant can be contrasted with a mathematical variable. For example, in the formula A=πr2, A and r are variables.
A mathematical constant can also be contrasted with a physical constant whose value is fixed by empirical measurement. Examples of physical constants include Newton's gravitational constant G and Planck's constant h.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: projectvxn
How about travel to a different past?
That would seem to negate or at least mitigate the effects of any paradox that my occur.
Same with travel to the future really, its never going to be the same timeline if multiverse theory holds any weight.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: projectvxn
How about travel to a different past?
That would seem to negate or at least mitigate the effects of any paradox that my occur.
Same with travel to the future really, its never going to be the same timeline if multiverse theory holds any weight.
originally posted by: lSkrewloosel
In my eyes time is just a form of measurement and go as far as just a human construct. Time and space for example , time measures how quick you close a space. From getting to point a to point b. Other than that we dont record time accurately as we base it on the four seasons rather than a full turn of the planet.
. a reply to: neutronflux
but misunderstanding time doesn't make it not real. Time is what it is: the measurement of the movement of celestial bodies through space from our perspective here on earth, with "time" denoted by seconds, minutes, degrees, and hours, as well as days, weeks, months and years. So a "year" denotes the earth's 360° orbit around the sun... today a "month" is roughly 1/12 of the sun cycle, but it was once known as a "moon," denoting the (approximately) 29 days of the moon's cycle from one new moon to the next
Inclassical, non-relativistic physics it is a scalar quantity and, like length, mass, and charge, is usually described as a fundamental quantity. Time can be combined mathematically with other physical quantities to derive other concepts such as motion, kinetic energy and time-dependent fields.
I'm going to pretend to be stupid and I don't understand what you're saying. ( lol )
All you've explained really is movement of celestial bodies ie distance travelled. Not time as such.
We don't need implements though. If I travel at a substantial speed for say a year, then return to Earth my hair will have grown by x amount. However upon my return I will find that my identical twin's hair has ten years worth of growth.
originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: Boadicea
How does that equate with my last post where I said...
We don't need implements though. If I travel at a substantial speed for say a year, then return to Earth my hair will have grown by x amount. However upon my return I will find that my identical twin's hair has ten years worth of growth.
originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: Boadicea
The 'implement' comment was in reference to a poster commenting about measuring time. Let me try again.
If you travel at a substantial percentage of the speed of light you will find that upon your return more time has elapsed on Earth than it has for you. Depending on the speed then a century might have passed but for you it might only have been a year or two.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: Boadicea
The 'implement' comment was in reference to a poster commenting about measuring time. Let me try again.
If you travel at a substantial percentage of the speed of light you will find that upon your return more time has elapsed on Earth than it has for you. Depending on the speed then a century might have passed but for you it might only have been a year or two.
Say you have a device capable of generating a gravitational field, then maybe there's a way to create a feedback look where reality gets bent opening up a door to another dimension. Accelerating to the near speed of light doesn't really change the fabric of reality or bend it.
originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: Boadicea
The 'implement' comment was in reference to a poster commenting about measuring time. Let me try again.
If you travel at a substantial percentage of the speed of light you will find that upon your return more time has elapsed on Earth than it has for you. Depending on the speed then a century might have passed but for you it might only have been a year or two.
originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: Boadicea
The faster the relative velocity, the greater the time dilation between one another, with the rate of time reaching zero as one approaches the speed of light (299,792,458 m/s). ... For sufficiently high speeds, the effect is dramatic. For example, one year of travel might correspond to ten years on Earth.