It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A federal appeals court in Colorado ruled Tuesday that a local police department does not have to compensate a homeowner whose house was destroyed by 19 hours of gunfire between officers and an armed shoplifting suspect who had chosen to barricade himself inside to evade arrest.
But now it was just a neighborhood crime scene, the suburban home where an armed Walmart shoplifting suspect randomly barricaded himself after fleeing the store on a June afternoon in 2015. For 19 hours, the suspect holed up in a bathroom as a SWAT team fired gas munition and 40-millimeter rounds through the windows, drove an armored vehicle through the doors, tossed flash-bang grenades inside and used explosives to blow out the walls.
originally posted by: spirit_horse
DAMN! That is ridiculous! I had a friend and one of his neighbors got raided by ATF. Someone called and told them he was out shooting a full-auto M16. No one was home at the time they hit the house. He came home to a search warrant taged on the door and written on it "Nothing found". They even pulled his paneling of the wall, cut the undersides of couches and box springs. Same thing, they don't pay for the damage they do. And it sounds like they won't be planning to anytime soon! BS!
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: EternalSolace
This is all about opening up a can of legal liability.
Say a cop clocks a speeder and flips on his lights.
The speeder punches it and runs a red light and t bones a car killing the passengers.
Are the cops liable?
The story is really about the courts protecting the cops from liability for doing their jobs.
Obviously this was excessive use of force though...
Hopefully the home owner will take it to the Supreme Court.
I wonder to if he had the home insured for its actual value.
The suspect was a simple armed shoplifter. Yes, he popped off some shots at the cops in pursuit. But a 19 hour gun battle over a solitary barricaded suspect, just no.
originally posted by: Sheye
a reply to: EternalSolace
The suspect was a simple armed shoplifter. Yes, he popped off some shots at the cops in pursuit. But a 19 hour gun battle over a solitary barricaded suspect, just no.
hmmm.. 🤔.. I think I may have been to quick to judge the LEO’s in this case, though I do think they could have used a better strategy for flushing this man out. I didn’t realize he had a gun and was engaging the officers in a fire fight at first. Dumb idea to shoot at LEO’s.. very dumb.. they have a right to protect themselves. Wish they would have had the intelligence to deal with the situation a different way at some point.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: EternalSolace
Bottom line...all cities have liability...and all work for you...and can be held responsible.
Like me...
EMT/1st Responder
Advanced Life Support
Emergency Manag./ Police, Fire /City
*We or I destroy something like that? City or municipality can be sued...
Yeah, what's your address? I'm gonna rob a nerf gun, and hide up in your place. Except it's probably not yours, you rent. In which case I'll steal your car and run it into a barricade. When I wreck, ill sue you for not having properly inflated tired and have some great twinkies while serving my time.
originally posted by: toysforadults
they should double your taxes
originally posted by: EternalSolace
A federal appeals court in Colorado ruled Tuesday that a local police department does not have to compensate a homeowner whose house was destroyed by 19 hours of gunfire between officers and an armed shoplifting suspect who had chosen to barricade himself inside to evade arrest.
Colorado homeowner owed nothing after police SWAT shootout destroys his house, federal court rules
But now it was just a neighborhood crime scene, the suburban home where an armed Walmart shoplifting suspect randomly barricaded himself after fleeing the store on a June afternoon in 2015. For 19 hours, the suspect holed up in a bathroom as a SWAT team fired gas munition and 40-millimeter rounds through the windows, drove an armored vehicle through the doors, tossed flash-bang grenades inside and used explosives to blow out the walls.
Police blew up an innocent man’s house in search of an armed shoplifter. Too bad, court rules.
A walmart shoplifter, who barricaded themselves in a house, warranted a 19 hour gun battle that destroyed this man's home. Is a shoplifter, especially a walmart shoplifter, worth such an effort to apprehend? What did he steal? A steak, some trash bags, or a $20 iphone cable? Doesn't matter! He stole and come hell or high water we'll blow up a $500,000 dollar home to get him!
I wonder how the judge who ruled the city doesn't owe would feel if I barricaded myself in the judges house for 19 hours causing it's complete destruction.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Muh thin blue line.