It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Drake Equation Fallacy

page: 27
14
<< 24  25  26   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
For example in America under 10% of the population are true atheists believing that statement, so you have a super minority opinion.


How is that an example of anything? That's an irrelevant appeal to popularity fallacy which says nothing. FYI, atheism is actually growing (and Christianity declining) faster than it ever has in the US and that's a fact based on the most recent Pew data.


However nearly 1,000 professional philosophers from 99 leading departments of philosophy shows that 72.8% considered themselves as atheists, so it seems philosophy makes people over think it all, and think they know better than what they perceive to be the uneducated masses.


LOL! Your posted has zero to do with anything I said. Try not to fail so hard next time. Arguing popularity and philosopher opinion about god doesn't say anything about probability or scientific evidence supporting evolution.




posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 09:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Barcs




It doesn't. Evolution is about how life changes over time, not the origin. You really need to educate yourself, a simple google search could have answered that for you.


Why so I can lose all common sense like you? I could've written your answer for you.


So being an uneducated ignoramus is considered common sense to you? No wonder you are so confused here and don't grasp a lick of science, logic or math!



Science doesn't work that way because everything science does is in a laboratory.


False.


You have absolutely no proof that any of what science postulates can happen in a
hostile environment.


HUH? Look up Miller Urey, you are just regurgitating pure nonsense again.


why isn't it happening some where out there right now?


You answered your own question in the previous statement. The environment has changed. This is the most ignorant childish point you've made yet. Who has no common sense again?



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: cooperton
1) There is no complete fossil of any of the theoretical missing links leading up to homo sapien, despite a theoretical 25 million years of time for such fossils to accumulate


And that makes the fossil specimens wrong? This is an idiotic argument that has already been debunked many times. Where is your refutation of the fossil they DID find? Funny how you ignore all those, but nitpick nonsense.


2) Dinosaurs undoubtedly lived alongside humans, further reinforced by carbon dating and soft-tissue being found in dinosaur remains summary (link)


That crap has been debunked for years bro and all that has already been explained to you but you don't care.


3) There is no laboratory evidence that an organism can change into another organism, despite millions of generations of labs attempting to do so around the world


False. Another blatant lie.


4) There is no demonstration that a novel functional protein can be created from a previously functionless protein via random mutations.


Not how evolution works. More dishonesty.


5) Epigenetics is the main factor that allows organisms to adapt,


Bahahahaha! You #ing liar!


but by its nature does not allow change outside of a particular bound. The mechanisms that were once assumed to be evolution at work are actually just an already set genome changing expression up and down within a particular boundary.


You know zilch about epigenetics LOL.


Of course there is. ALL universal laws act according to very intelligent meticulous patterns that have been perpetuating since the beginning of written history.


It's funny how you selectively deny ANY science supporting evolution, yet champion any type of BS you can to argue God. It's pathetically dishonest, as always. LMFAO @ intelligent meticulous patterns perpetuating since the beginning of written history. What kind of pretentious buffoonery is that!?

Name a single test or experiment you can do to test the existence of god? You literally got nothing so you make dishonest assumptions based on loose associations in word pasta but deny scientific research. It's comically bad, bro.


Electromagnetism
thermodynamics
Kinetics
E = mc2
etc, etc, etc, all act according to very precise laws. All laws known to humankind were created by something intelligent. Intelligence is a requirement for ordered systems to be created and perpetuate.


LMFAO! None of that shows any evidence of being designed. You just state presuppositions as fact. Pretty weak, but this is expected.



For you to keep saying there is no evidence for intelligence is extremely unintelligent.


For you to keep saying there is evidence for intelligent design, but not evolution is some of the most dishonest nonsense I've ever heard. Just another uneducated creationist pretending to know more about science than actual scientists and pretending you can just selectively disregard any research that counters your presuppositions.


edit on 11 20 19 by Barcs because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 09:48 AM
link   
LOL @ creative artwork being called evidence of dinosaurs living with humans. So I guess The X-men are real since we have art depicting them. There's no way they could have just thought of that without an influence LOL.

This is now the official short bus thread. This is like little kids that just learned basic addition and subtraction arguing against calculus.
edit on 11 20 19 by Barcs because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Barcs




LOL @ creative artwork being called evidence

So you do believe the artwork was created right?

No reason to look for an explanation other than design? Am I right?

edit on 20-11-2019 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Barcs

And that makes the fossil specimens wrong? This is an idiotic argument that has already been debunked many times. Where is your refutation of the fossil they DID find? Funny how you ignore all those, but nitpick nonsense.

That crap has been debunked for years bro and all that has already been explained to you but you don't care.

False. Another blatant lie.

Not how evolution works. More dishonesty.

Bahahahaha! You #ing liar!


You know zilch about epigenetics LOL.

It's funny how you selectively deny ANY science supporting evolution, yet champion any type of BS you can to argue God. It's pathetically dishonest, as always. LMFAO @ intelligent meticulous patterns perpetuating since the beginning of written history. What kind of pretentious buffoonery is that!?




Notice how he just barks? Barc, barc, barc, no real substance. What a waste of time.


originally posted by: carsforkids

So you do believe the artwork was created right?

No reason to look for an explanation other than design? Am I right?


Don't even give him attention, he is an automaton
edit on 20-11-2019 by cooperton because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: cooperton


Notice how he just barks? Barc, barc, barc, no real substance. What a waste of time.


And yet, you did not answer his question
You deem to cherry pick a lot in this thread!



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: cooperton

Of course, like always, you don't have a single rebuttal to anything just denial of hard science while embracing delusion as absolute truth. Pathetically dishonest, but that's par for the course with creationists.




top topics



 
14
<< 24  25  26   >>

log in

join