It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Transcript of Zelensky phone call and evidence of cover-up

page: 9
17
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: mtnshredder

There’s some well rehearsed disinformation currently being posted on this site as gospel, buyer beware.


Why didn't socialists/democrats demand the impeachment of Obama/Biden when they used our 3 letter agencies to spy on e EVERYONE,, including journalists, Senators, representatives, etc...

Obama Political Spying Scandal: Trump Associates Were Not the First Targets

You have got to wonder why socialists/democrats didn't call for Obama/Biden's impeachment when they went after journalists whom would not give up their sources...

[url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-obama-administration-wants-journalist-131441875.html]Why The Obama Administration Wants This Journalist In Jail


You have got to wonder why is it that socialists/democrats didn't demand for Obama's impeachment when he FIRED the actual whistleblower of Fast and Furious... Obama even refused to allow the ATF head to appear before Congress...

[url=https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/obama-fires-project-gunrunner-whistleblower-refuses-to-allow-atf-head-to-appear-before-congre ss/]Obama Fires Project Gunrunner Whistleblower, Refuses To Allow ATF Head To Appear Before Congress

Why didn't socialists/democrats demand for the impeachment of Obama when he fought subpoenas, or blocked officials from testifying before Congress 9 times?...

9 Times The Obama Administration Fought Subpoenas or Blocked Officials from Testifying Before Congress

Top Obama aide defies House Oversight subpoena

Why didn't socialists/democrats demand the impeachment of Obama when he bypassed Congress and wrote and passed his own environmental laws without Congress approval?...

Does President Obama Really Think He Can Keep Making ‘Laws’ Without Congress’s Approval?

Why didn't socialists/democrats demand Obama's and Biden's impeachment when they went after journalists and whistleblowers and FORCED THEM to give up their sources...

CNN's Tapper: Obama has used Espionage Act more than all previous administrations

Obama’s Legacy: A Historic War On Whistleblowers

Trump rages about leakers. Obama quietly prosecuted them.

Obama's DOJ obstructed justice, including in Fast and Furious...

7 Times The Obama Administration Obstructed Justice

Obama and Biden, among others, actually did break laws, and NOT ONCE did socialists/democrats call for his impeachment...



edit on 3-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add links and comment.




posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015



It seems it's not just a violation of election laws and quid pro quo.


QPQ is not illegal. This would never be considered a violation of election law.



Vindman's testimony that some specific details were left out of the rough transcript adds further insight about how the White House handled the call and Democrats' concerns that the Trump administration engaged in a coverup


The transcription is verified by no less than three translators. Sometimes up to ten. If we have to trust the transcript or vindman, tie goes to the transcript every time.



Republicans need to stop blaming Democrats for what Trump did to himself or continues to do to himself.


Here's the thing: trump has done nothing to himself. This is simply a smear job. Just like "russian collusion." If you are suggesting that trump forced the interpreters to all lie on the transcript, then why haven't they come forward? We only have obviously biased people coming out and disapproving (not incriminating, but insinuating). It's a dog and pony show.

You fell for russia collusion. Now you're falling for this. Good luck.



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Simple, he was on board with the deep state plans for our decline so they could all get rich and seize power..
edit on 3-11-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2019 @ 07:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: UKTruth

A President has every right to make demands of foreign countries in exchange for aid. You're reading too much into biased media BS trying to criminalise the Presidents job.
...


He didn't demand anything though, and even the Ukrainian president has said so. He asked for a favor when it was the Ukrainians whom were the first whom wanted to give us evidence of the corruption since 2018.


The transcript would suggest he didn't demand anything - correct. But even if he did, he is well within his constitutional remit to do so.

Cut through all the partisan BS and the question for those determining whether to impeach or convict should be whether the President abused his powers. He did if there was no reason to investigate Ukraine's involvement in the 2016 election or no reason to investigate Biden. That should be an easy question. Show us the reasons why you want this investigation. Given the low bar set since 2016, that is going to be extremely easy.



posted on Nov, 4 2019 @ 12:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: bloodymarvelous

Isn't ironic how the Obama administration, including Biden, Hillary and the DNC used RUSSIAN and UKRAINIAN LIES to spy on not only candidate Trump, but everyone linked to him, ,and it was completely legal and okay. But if POTUS Trump, for running as a Republican and [B] not being a globalist [/B], asks Ukraine to investigate ONE PERSON's apparent corruption with Ukraine and all of a sudden that's enough to impeach the POTUS?...

Hypocrites, liars, and criminals, those seem to be the skills you need these days to be a socialist/democrat...





That is the problem.

There are enough people that want to be globalists (and don't realize what that entails.....)

They will let it slide. Some believe globalism is the future of the world, and don't see it as history repeating itself (like when the Soviet Union sought to unite all of Eastern Europe under one socialist flag, where the leaders didn't have to obey any rules, or allow free exchange of ideas, and could jail people for opposing them politically.)

It failed the first time. But it was such a beautiful faerie tale.

Leaders who needed no checks, nor balances. And people just do what they're told and shut up.

No investigating corruption. How can leaders who tell you not to be racist, and to share, ever do anything wrong anyway?



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 08:49 AM
link   
My point is, Globalism, especially its socialist form, is just another manifestation of Marxist theory of human history.

en.wikipedia.org...

He believed humanity would inevitably become communist, because that was the trend. The theory is used as a joke by actual scientists, sometimes, because it had the ability to find itself to be true no matter what the actual evidence said.


It makes it possible for political leaders to follow the very definition of madness: trying the same thing again and again, but expecting a different result.



What would really happen with globalism uniting all of earth into one culture, is the same thing that happens with inbreeding. With no inputs from any outside force, the system would rapidly succumb to its own entropy.



new topics

top topics
 
17
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join