It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Schiff Directing Witnesses Not To Answer GOP Questions

page: 2
48
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock
This is all going to play out just fine.

My prediction?

Trump is impeached, removed from office, pence folds and lets the dems control him for 1 year until the election.

A Biden/Warren or Clinton/Warren ticket is a landslide winning all states. Landslide dem wins in all elections. Trump is in prison and we can get back to business as usual.

America gets back on track as it relinquishes power and the dems gently cradle the country into it's downfall as a third world nation.


Trump will not be removed by the Senate. Ever. Will.Not.Happen. So the rest of your silly speculation is null and void.




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock
This is all going to play out just fine.

My prediction?

Trump is impeached, removed from office, pence folds and lets the dems control him for 1 year until the election.

A Biden/Warren or Clinton/Warren ticket is a landslide winning all states. Landslide dem wins in all elections. Trump is in prison and we can get back to business as usual.

America gets back on track as it relinquishes power and the dems gently cradle the country into it's downfall as a third world nation.


Sounds like utopia to me



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:37 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock
This is all going to play out just fine.

My prediction?

Trump is impeached, removed from office, pence folds and lets the dems control him for 1 year until the election.

A Biden/Warren or Clinton/Warren ticket is a landslide winning all states. Landslide dem wins in all elections. Trump is in prison and we can get back to business as usual.

America gets back on track as it relinquishes power and the dems gently cradle the country into it's downfall as a third world nation.


I need you to buy me a lottery ticket!




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:37 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:38 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

And an audio book recording can run for 10+ hours and I can read it in 2, what's your point?



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut


I don't think


You could have just stopped right there and it would have been ok.




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:41 PM
link   
a reply to: HalWesten

I am going with Ed Buck evil but, You may be right. It could be the eyes of someone so accustom to lawlessness.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:43 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




Also came out the witness wanted to change the transcript to something it wasn't


No it wasn't. When there are more than one person creating a transcript, due to language, etc., editing takes place. Vinman edited the transcript and he said not all his edits were accepted, but the very damning ones for Trump were. He said that the actual transcript and the memo that the White House release were different. According to Vinman, Trump mentions Biden and Burisma a bunch more times during the call.

That's what the whistle blower said too.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


They are asking questions to get the identity of the whistleblower.


Um, maybe read the OP?


Jim Jordan who attempted to asked the initial anonymous “whistleblower” who they spoke with following the infamous July phone call


Who was Jim Jordan asking questions of?


...the initial anonymous “whistleblower”...


Or are you thinking that Jim Jordan did not know the identify of whom he was asking questions?



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

I don't know who's post's I miss less.





posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Isn't this just the preliminary investigation portion of the proceedings?

I don't think that due process requiring discovery being shared to both legal teams takes place until just before the court case, which will be before Congress.


False. First of all, because Schiff decided to use a SCIF, the majority of U.S. representatives, nor a majority of Senators will not have access to the actual transcripts of what was said by the witnesses in the SCIF, and neither will they have access to any evidence used in the SCIF.


...
ACCESS
...
Access to SCIFs is normally limited to those individuals with appropriate security clearances.[3] Non-cleared personnel in SCIFs must be under the constant oversight of cleared personnel and all classified information and material removed from view in order to prevent unauthorized access.[4] As part of this process, non-cleared personnel are also typically required to surrender all recording, photographic and other electronic media devices.All of the activity and conversation inside is presumed restricted from public disclosure.
...

Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility(SCIF)

SCIFs are supposed to only be used in investigations or briefings in counter-terrorism ops, or other ops in which all evidence provided must remain a secret and cannot be released to the public. Schiff is the chairman, and since it is an impeachment they won't allow the POTUS, the VP, etc whom would back POTUS Trump from being in the SCIF, hence no one will be able to release what actually occurred in the SCIF. This means that Schiff is the only one which can claim whatever he wants was said/occurred in the SCIF, and no one will be able to deny or corroborate whatever Schiff claims. That is unless someone decides to leak, but Schiff has already threatened Republicans with prosecution if they do leak anything.

Second of all, POTUS Trump's own counsel is not allowed in a SCIF, so he cannot cross examine the witnesses the democrats are bringing, and as you can see Schiff doesn't want the witnesses from answering the questions from those Republicans.

During the close door proceedings by the House during the Clinton impeachment his counsel was allowed to cross-examine the witnesses, and to bring pro-Clinton witnesses for testimony.

These socialist dictators wannabe with the lying sack of Schiff at the helm are not allowing the POTUS to have due process.

This claim that "they will be able to cross examine the witnesses and bring their own witnesses later" is a lie, as anything said, or any evidence presented in a SCIF will ALWAYS be restricted information which won't see the light of day.






edit on 29-10-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add, and correct comment and add excerpt.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:45 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

But again, with all these "insiders" close to the phone call especially this one today, why didn't he or anybody else bring his version with him and submit it ? 🐇😃🐇😃



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: MisterSpock
This is all going to play out just fine.

My prediction?

Trump is impeached, removed from office, pence folds and lets the dems control him for 1 year until the election.

A Biden/Warren or Clinton/Warren ticket is a landslide winning all states. Landslide dem wins in all elections. Trump is in prison and we can get back to business as usual.

America gets back on track as it relinquishes power and the dems gently cradle the country into it's downfall as a third world nation.


Never mind
edit on 29-10-2019 by Veryolduser because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen




Also came out the witness wanted to change the transcript to something it wasn't


No it wasn't. When there are more than one person creating a transcript, due to language, etc., editing takes place. Vinman edited the transcript and he said not all his edits were accepted, but the very damning ones for Trump were. He said that the actual transcript and the memo that the White House release were different. According to Vinman, Trump mentions Biden and Burisma a bunch more times during the call.

That's what the whistle blower said too.



The whistle blower had no first hand information.

In the really real world on these calls, 4-6 transcribers write down the call while listening to it, they all get together after, go through their notes and agree on what was said and it is then the official transcription.

But let's get real.

You don't agree with the official transcription because it does not fit your conformation bias.

If we had a recording of it and it was the same, you would not agree with it because it might be edited by Darth Vader or someone and it would not fit your conformation bias.

If it was video recorded and it was the same as the transcript, then it would be a deep fake video because it does not fit your conformation bias.

The problem isn't the transcript.

The problem is that you are not able to accept a transcript that is admissible as evidence in a court of law because...

it does not fit your conformation bias.

Perhaps some introspection on the matter may help you.

I doubt it.




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 09:58 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 10:00 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join