Two Southwest pilots live streamed video from a plane's bathroom to the cockpit

How else could they know that they were arriving over the 'Eur-a-pean' continent ?

originally posted by: roadgravel

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: butcherguy

I suppose it is those long boring hours in the air.

So where is the talk about firing the pilots? Oh right, the whistle blowers are the bad ones.

These two pilots get the 737 max - that will keep them busy.

Firing the pilots? Ever heard of due process?

I said talk. Ever hear of reading.

Yeah, I read that part. Perhaps I need to reword my question for your comprehension level?

Why would we be talking about firing the pilots without due process?

a reply to: roadgravel

From the OP source...

"Southwest will vigorously defend the lawsuit. When the incident happened two years ago, we investigated the allegations and addressed the situation with the crew involved. We can confirm from our investigation that there was never a camera in the lavatory."

Maybe SW in some sort of test phase put in several hidden cameras, not just the lavatories, but in the galleys and isles on this particular aircraft for study, for the pilots to access via iPad/pad. A test platform for not just security but for seeing how the employees do their job and that the flight attendant In this case happened to accidentally see the iPad when the pilot forgot to hit the stand by button. Maybe the flight attendant and husband are looking for Some sort of a free hand out?

Or it could all be a completely made up story by the FA.

Who buys an expensive hidden camera and has time to install it when they (the pilots) change aircraft and flight crew almost every flight?

a reply to: Fowlerstoad

This is quite the enigma for me also.

What satisfaction can one possibly get from watching video from a toilet cam?

We just recently had a similar incident at several hospitals in my area. I just don't get it.

wjno.iheart.com...

a reply to: Alien Abduct

That's obviously CYA for the company.

The person took a pic of the screen showing the lavatory. That should be in the civil case, I would think.

As if this person made the whole thing up for some lawsuit that would have no merit and fail.

Someday you might understand there is much corruption in business. Of course there was "no camera".

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: Alien Abduct

That's obviously CYA for the company.

The person took a pic of the screen showing the lavatory. That should be in the civil case, I would think.

As if this person made the whole thing up for some lawsuit that would have no merit and fail.

Someday you might understand there is much corruption in business. Of course there was "no camera".

Yeah people never make up crazy scenarios for frivolous lawsuits... how about...

-Animal Rights Group Sues on Behalf of Monkey for Ownership of “Selfies”

-8-year-old New York Boy is Sued by His Aunt for a “Careless” Hug

-Pennsylvania Nursing Student Fails a Course Twice and Sues the School for Not Helping With Anxiety

-Colorado Inmate is Suing the NFL for $88 Billion Over the 2015 Cowboy’s Playoff Loss

-Florida Woman is Suing FedEx for Tripping Over a Package Left at Her Doorstep

-An Officer in North Carolina is Suing Starbucks for $750,000 Over Hot Coffee

-California Woman Allegedly Fakes Coffee Burns and Then Sues McDonald’s

source

Or how about...

-The $67 Million Pants

-You Infringed On My Patent (Even Though I Didn't Have One)!

-It's Your Fault I Look Like You!

-You Mean Iced Drinks Actually Contain Ice?

source


Yeah never happens...