It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: UKTruth
Live your life through assumptions and you will assume too much.
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
So, can you explain how not buying a newspaper is an attack on free speech?
If I were to trump you, I would ignore your reply, call it an attack then proceed to remove you from my reply list.
So, you are unable to clarify how not buying a newspaper is an attack on free speech?
That's what I thought. Because it isn't.
Sure let's set a precedent as we speak , remove all media that is critical to the current administration that way we are guaranteed only positive press.
Why should the tax payer be forced to subsidize the purchase of these papers for government employees? Why cant those people in government just buy them, you know, like the rest of us? I know, radical idea.
These offices have coffee to, I bet they provide paper and pencils unlike the schools. Maybe they don't need those.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: The2Billies
First is trump talking about all subscriptions, or just those he dont like?
Second, not everyone owns cellphones. Some of us just dont like the idea that we should be available 24/7 and feel that people wont die if they have to wait till we get home to talk to us. I only got mine when I wanted to take advantage of wal mart's pick up grocery service.
And it's a cheap prepaid phone with limited data usage... so, I'm selfish with my data usage. Unless there is wifi available, I ain't using the internet on it. Contrary to what some want to believe not everyone of limited means is walking around with top of the line cellphones with unlimited service. Dont have any games on it either.. they seem to cause problems with the phone.
Three.. of course you have to bring in the "responsibilty" lecture.. the all purpose go to for conservatives.
Four, I was just trying to explain how those subscriptions might be considered beneficial and therefore not really subsidies.
Personally, my first thoughts went to the kids who end up sitting in waiting rooms with their parents. Have you ever been in a pediatricians waiting room? They have boring, out of date magazines because they spend a small fortune on interesting and fun toys to occupy the kids because being stuck in an office with a bunch of bored, fussy, unhappy kids is gonna drive everyone nuts and cause the parents to start complaining more often about wait times. If a few subscriptions of some children's magazine will occupy some of a kids time while waiting, it's worth it!
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: The2Billies
Today it is a total waste of government money to pay for any print subscription. Period.
So they pay for non print instead? if there are no paid news who pays the journalists?
This is why there is any news someone does a job someone gets paid.
originally posted by: 727Sky
My only regret is I did not think of this and send my thoughts to the White House but in all fairness I had no idea the government was subsidizing these papers !! What a great idea ! Wonder how bad this will affect their bottom line; layoffs to follow ?
originally posted by: The2Billies
It is a shame that the government pays for ANY subscriptions and I think they should cancel them ALL. But if you don't agree, that's ok, but you won't change my mind.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: The2Billies
It is a shame that the government pays for ANY subscriptions and I think they should cancel them ALL. But if you don't agree, that's ok, but you won't change my mind.
As another professor, I will disagree here.
Remember the cost of professional journals and subscriptions. While I would love to be able to pay for all the access articles I need (and this includes things I get through JSTOR), there's some things that aren't available through these channels and where access is very costly.
And yeah, we can get into the changing economics of that... but, still, to branches like NASA and to the military (military tech journals), these things are important and departmental subscriptions mean access for everyone in the department and not just access for those who can afford it and think to buy it. Departmental access also allows for a broader spectrum of information rather than a narrow cherry-picked access by a single individual.
Speaking from experience... your mileage may vary.
originally posted by: The2Billies
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: The2Billies
It is a shame that the government pays for ANY subscriptions and I think they should cancel them ALL. But if you don't agree, that's ok, but you won't change my mind.
As another professor, I will disagree here.
Remember the cost of professional journals and subscriptions.
(snip)
Speaking from experience... your mileage may vary.
Professional journals are in a different category from newspapers and magazines.
I would not count professional journals as that sort of subscription.
However, most if no all are also available online for the department to subscribe to, just as Universities do for professional journals. These are not the types of subscriptions that the government should not be paying for, they should not pay for newspapers or magazines (professional journals are not magazines as you are well aware).
How one could think I would confuse a professional journal with newspaper rags used under bird cages or magazines found on the rack at stores is beyond me.
White House plans to direct government staffers to not renew orders with the newspapers, whose coverage he has disparaged as ‘fake’
By Andrew Restuccia
Updated Oct. 24, 2019 4:07 pm ET
WASHINGTON—The White House is planning to instruct federal agencies to not renew their subscriptions to the New York Times and the Washington Post, administration officials said, escalating President Trump’s attacks on the media outlets.
source: www.wsj.com...
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: UKTruth
Live your life through assumptions and you will assume too much.
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
So, can you explain how not buying a newspaper is an attack on free speech?
If I were to trump you, I would ignore your reply, call it an attack then proceed to remove you from my reply list.
So, you are unable to clarify how not buying a newspaper is an attack on free speech?
That's what I thought. Because it isn't.
Sure let's set a precedent as we speak , remove all media that is critical to the current administration that way we are guaranteed only positive press.