It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: DOJ Launches Criminal Investigation Seeks Charges In Russia Probe

page: 17
71
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Reading from OANN that it is James Baker who has
flipped and is cooperating with John Durham.

Waiting for a link.

He was a subject of the investigation according
to the news here:

www.foxnews.com...

edit on 25-10-2019 by burntheships because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
And where is John Brennan?

He hasn't been around for many days, its like
all of the sudden he went into hiding?

Been seven days since he tweeted.
And he hasn't been on CNN either.



Good guess might be an exclusive Black Sea resort in Crimea 😎



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 03:44 PM
link   
There are, have been and is, a "domestic enemies" in the U.S. government for, at least the last 80 years. The, "The plan", propaganda/"public education" didn't pan out for them with the D. Trump election.
Notice how the DEM/LIB (communist) have been using the word "Republic" instead of "Democracy" more recently in their MSM interviews?
It used to be, "an attack on our democracy"! But now? For some reason, for the last month or two it is, and has been, "This is a (Trump) threat to our/the Republic"!

May God bless Pres. Trump! Long live the C.O.T.U.S.!

Unlike the dems that take "the oath". Then turn around and call it an "old rag". Or, (this is the best yet,) "we have to pass this law in order to know what's in it".. I could go on.

Personally, I'm sick of traitors.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

He is certainly capable of it.

What was the name he used on his passport when
he secretly went to Ukraine during the set up?

Google makes it hard these days....



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Theyy
a reply to: UKTruth

the only reason you have impeachment is because the president admitted to a crime on tv
a distraction of his own making LOL


Except he didn't. This is made up. There is no crime in that phone call. The transcript is out and you guys are still lying about what's in it. I got news for you, most Americans can read. They see there's nothing in there. They see you're blatantly lying and just assuming they're too dumb to realize it.

That's not gonna play well for you on election day. Keep it up.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

lol its on video he said it live on TV can't fake that sorry
Unless you are calling Trump a liar?

are you calling trump a liar?!?! reee!!



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Theyy
a reply to: UKTruth

the only reason you have impeachment is because the president admitted to a crime on tv
a distraction of his own making LOL


Except he didn't. This is made up. There is no crime in that phone call. The transcript is out and you guys are still lying about what's in it. I got news for you, most Americans can read. They see there's nothing in there. They see you're blatantly lying and just assuming they're too dumb to realize it.

That's not gonna play well for you on election day. Keep it up.


One problem: Mick Mulvaney.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

oh yeah i forgot, not only did trump admit the crime lil micky admited it LOL and rudy and trumps ambassador lol


ooops



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Theyy

If the transcript was accurate, then I agree ... nothing there to impeach Trump on. However, since that release there have been multiple Trump Administration witnesses who have testified, Mick Mulvaney, White House Chief of Staff who might be in a position to know about quid pro quo, etc. etc.

And today, a judge decided that DOJ has to turn over the unredacted Mueller Report to the House.

Interesting times, eh?



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Again, the peach mints story is irrelevant to
Durham's investigation.

It is years too late for the Democrats to do anything
about it at this point.

All that is left is the the crying, which has started.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:14 PM
link   

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!


All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
No Political Trolling.....either in words or images. Please read new thread.

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Theyy
a reply to: face23785

lol its on video he said it live on TV can't fake that sorry
Unless you are calling Trump a liar?

are you calling trump a liar?!?! reee!!


Seriously, this is a troll attempt, right? I can not be sure anymore. There is no way someone can think like this and try to spin everything the way you do. This is comedy, correct? Am I missing some italics somewhere? Maybe a sarcasm font?

The ENTIRE transcript is available to everyone. Asking a government to look into corruption is not illegal, no matter who or what you are investigating. Also, Biden is not a candidate for President so how could Trump be asking for help in an election, when there is not an election going on? Do you know what year it is?

You should really look into the powers of a sitting President before you spout this stuff. This was in our basics civics courses back in my college days.

edit on 25-10-2019 by KnoxMSP because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-10-2019 by KnoxMSP because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Gryphon66

Again, the peach mints story is irrelevant to
Durham's investigation.

It is years too late for the Democrats to do anything
about it at this point.

All that is left is the the crying, which has started.



I hope you're not disappointed again with nothing more than process complaints.

2nd line.
edit on 25-10-2019 by Gryphon66 because: DOH



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: KnoxMSP

lol the crime was already admitted on tv by trump and multiple members of his administration



we dont need no stinkin fake transcript



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Theyy
a reply to: KnoxMSP

lol the crime was already admitted on tv by trump and multiple members of his administration



we dont need no stinkin fake transcript


So, yes this is a troll?

Cool. Next time just make it more obvious.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: KnoxMSP

can't debate facts calls troll lolol

“To be clear, what you described is a quid pro quo,” Karl pointed out. But Mulvaney was unbothered: “we do that all the time with foreign policy,” he said, confirming Karl’s characterization.



Ooops



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: KnoxMSP

You know that the released "transcript" was heavily edited, right?

I wonder if some of the stuff that was "cut" made it into the Intelligence Committee's investigation?



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: KnoxMSP

originally posted by: Theyy
a reply to: KnoxMSP

lol the crime was already admitted on tv by trump and multiple members of his administration



we dont need no stinkin fake transcript


So, yes this is a troll?

Cool. Next time just make it more obvious.


Keep in mind, these are the same people that thought Trump really was a Russian agent. They'll believe ANYTHING as long as it fits their preferred political narrative. Critical thinking is not exactly encouraged over there. It's toe the line or else.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Theyy
a reply to: KnoxMSP

can't debate facts calls troll lolol

“To be clear, what you described is a quid pro quo,” Karl pointed out. But Mulvaney was unbothered: “we do that all the time with foreign policy,” he said, confirming Karl’s characterization.



Ooops


If that's a crime, every single past president will have to be indicted. And you know that, you're just so desperate you have to ignore that.

It's not a crime and no charges will come from it. You're getting lied to, again. You got lied to nonstop for 3 years about Russia and now you're getting lied to about Ukraine, and you LOVE IT. You absolutely love being told what to think because Orange Man Bad.

Please grow up and start thinking for yourself. This # is getting embarrassing.



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

I hope you're not disappointed again with nothing more than process complaints.

2nd line.


I think you meant process crimes

Too early for you to get your hopes up on that obviously,
as the actions in question far supersede that possibility.

Just by the texts of Peter Strzok alone, we know that
there is more coming down the pike. Also recall
that Andrew McCabe and James Comey have both
been recommended for prosecution.



edit on 25-10-2019 by burntheships because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
71
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join