It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

They've Got Trump Now! William Taylor Delivers The Smoking Gun!

page: 6
38
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati

His testimony is valid...Yes or No.

It's a binary question.




posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:18 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


(post by thedigirati removed for a manners violation)

posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I don't know

I have no way of knowing from misleading NEWS reports

Do you have any NEWS reports that are not misleading I can read and judge from??

yes or no?


(post by Mach2 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Mach2

I've often wondered if Hillary has a sister, or maybe a cousin.

it is atleast possible....



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Mach2

I've often wondered if Hillary has a sister, or maybe a cousin.

it is atleast possible....


Well, we know she has a "double", for those times she craps herself, or is too drunk to make an appearance.




posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:58 AM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati




Do you have any NEWS reports that are not misleading I can read and judge from??


You can read his own opening statement, right here: www.cbsnews.com...



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 11:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
Quid pro quo is not really relevant, though it is fuel for the fire.

What the hell is the POTUS doing when bypassing the state department and the DOJ and using his personal lawyer (with his shady connections)........


The simple reason is that Guiliani and Trump are cut from the same cloth...AKA shady.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 11:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

wow sookie you FINALLY found an HONEST news source

Notice how they did not call him an ambassador??

and so what he is only a chargé d'affaires

so he is not the "doctor" so his opinion is moot.

can you find someone of Authority that says this??

(everyone but you will understand this)



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
Quid pro quo is not really relevant, though it is fuel for the fire.

It was all they talked about until they realized there was none.


What the hell is the POTUS doing when bypassing the state department and the DOJ and using his personal lawyer (with his shady connections) to seek foreign assistance for his reelection campaign?

Bypassing the deep state TDS suffering pos' that are fighting his policies tooth and nail and trying to make sure the investigations into the real crimes committed by the dems go unrevealed/unpunished.

That's what he is doing. Get over it.


Maybe we'll find out.

I sure to God hope so. At least it is looking more and more likely, now that Barr has greenlighted the expansion of Durhams criminal investigation to include Brennan and Clapper after getting Steele's testimony (he must be rolling over on them... this is gonna be good...
edit on 23-10-2019 by tanstaafl because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati




Notice how they did not call him an ambassador??


So? Should I ignore web sites that call Rudy Giulian "Mayor"? Should we ignore Fox News because they call Jeanine Pirro "Judge"?

Is the "Ambassador's" testimony valid? Yes or no?



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

it holds no weight, he is not an Ambassador.

like my opinion and yours.

no weight.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: thedigirati




Notice how they did not call him an ambassador??


So? Should I ignore web sites that call Rudy Giulian "Mayor"? Should we ignore Fox News because they call Jeanine Pirro "Judge"?

Is the "Ambassador's" testimony valid? Yes or no?



That depends. If it's just the facts, and nothing but the facts, then yes.

If it's opinion, and has a bias slant, then no.

It is my opinion, that the latter is the case, as opposed to the former.

That's the problem with these dim investigations/accusations. The are not following facts. They are throwing crap against the wall, in the hope that something eventually sticks.

The problem with that is "the boy who cried wolf" syndrome. They, like the MSM, have lost credibility with the average American.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati




it holds no weight, he is not an Ambassador.


LOL Oh Okay. So all the panic and head spinning because of William Taylor's testimony yesterday is all a non-starter, because he's not an "Ambassador".

You should join Trump's prestigious legal team!

edit on 23-10-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
Quid pro quo is not really relevant, though it is fuel for the fire.

What the hell is the POTUS doing when bypassing the state department and the DOJ and using his personal lawyer (with his shady connections) to seek foreign assistance for his reelection campaign?

Maybe we'll find out.


Giuliani is the President’s defense attorney.

The Ukraine corruption is intertwined with the Russia collusion hoax.

It is every lawyer’s legal duty to vigorously defend their client.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Phage,

Did you read the transcript?
It doesn't corroborate some of the assertions you reference, so I am wondering what your "us guys" "heard" source is.
Is that from the mouth of a second hand testimony holder?

Because as far as I've read, it's not on paper, buddy.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Just a reminder that personal attacks in the Mudpit are off limits.

It Is Time To Get The Mud Back Into The Political Mudpit

Carry on.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Dfairlite

"Us guys" think so because he specifically said "Biden."

And "us guys" have heard that certain benefits were contingent upon a public announcement that such an investigation was being undertaken.


You sure seem to wish that was treason when clearly it was his LEGAL , duly elected job to seek justice in this crime against the office of the POTUS. Sad, to see the hate runs deep with people on your team.

Biden is burnt toast with his own press conference where he was bragging about the EXTORTION, my word. Biden said he demanded they fire the prosecutor investigating his son's gravy train, my words, and added "what do you know, that somebitch got fired" and you have the nerve to lie about DJT.


Mark my words.

The corrupt will not volunteer to give up their power. The Citizens have had enough. We are going to have to act or die slaves. Drama is not my forte'. Facts are important to me.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 09:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Phage

They do not retain titles.


Retired General Flynn, not a general anymore. General Mattis, not a general anymore. General Kelly, not a general anymore.


Makes sense he be seeing retired in front of it. Problem solved and the facts are acurate. I hear them say Former Pres Shrub and Former Pres Carter so I think you too miss the point. Is this on purpose?




top topics



 
38
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join