It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump eyeing Mulvaney replacement

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:12 PM
link   
Just saw this bit of news drop:

Mulvaney Replacements?

There was also a tweet from Trump that was taken down almost immediatley confirming that he's mulling these candidates over.




Personally I'd prefer to see Conway get the job.




posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer
don't you get entered into that job pool when you buy 2 maga hats?
I swore thats what the sign said....



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Wayfarer
don't you get entered into that job pool when you buy 2 maga hats?
I swore thats what the sign said....



That seems reasonable to me.

For what its worth I think you'd make an excellent chief of staff (compared to some of the others he's had).



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer
missed my chance
I didn't buy any hats....



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Wayfarer
missed my chance
I didn't buy any hats....


Well at the rate he's going to Chiefs of staff I'd say there's still time!



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Just saw this bit of news drop:

Mulvaney Replacements?

There was also a tweet from Trump that was taken down almost immediatley confirming that he's mulling these candidates over.




Personally I'd prefer to see Conway get the job.


Bloomberg is a biased source !!!!!!!

from the link above:

according to people familiar with the matter
😃!!!!!!!

But sure, Mulvaney was probably placed in the sunburn for a reason.

And Conway would be better of course 😎



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:50 PM
link   
Wouldn't you?

Mulvaney is a dumbass.



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
Wouldn't you?

Mulvaney is a dumbass.


Yeah he's seemingly quite thick.


As I said, I think Conway is the best pick, if only because there isn't anyone in the administration as loyal to Trump (not to mention she's clearly more clever/savvy than Mulvaney).



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

Conway should probably stay where she is.

It will likely be someone we haven't heard of yet.

I hope the President now fully understands how difficult it is to hire someone to be the voice of an entire administration. There won't be another like Sarah Sanders.



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 03:07 PM
link   
Conway doesn't want it. Kushner doesn't want it. They've both been top picks in the past.

And it's not a surprise that after admitting the quid pro quo and then being brazen about the emoluments clause violations a week later would make his position shaky. At the very least.

My guess: Trump does not actually fill the role with the 5th person immediately, and things just go on with him being his own chief-of-staff for a little while.



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 03:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Oraculi

Was Mulvaney actually ever officially instated as Chief of Staff or was he just 'acting' CoS?
edit on 43pm19fpmTue, 22 Oct 2019 15:27:46 -0500America/ChicagoTue, 22 Oct 2019 15:27:46 -0500 by Wayfarer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

Just "acting".


 


He surrounds himself with "only the best people". Sessions, Mattis, Flynn, Manafort, Cohen, Giuliani, Pruitt, and the list goes on and on.

Oh, wait, those have all been indicted, plead guilty, or been on the receiving end of Trump twitter tantrums. Why does anyone trust his judgement about choosing "the best people" when they're all criminals, or people he's later insulted and/or pretended he never really knew?



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Just saw this bit of news drop:

Mulvaney Replacements?

There was also a tweet from Trump that was taken down almost immediatley confirming that he's mulling these candidates over.




Personally I'd prefer to see Conway get the job.


Bloomberg is a biased source !!!!!!!

from the link above:

according to people familiar with the matter
😃!!!!!!!

But sure, Mulvaney was probably placed in the sunburn for a reason.

And Conway would be better of course 😎



so when you present ' bombshells' from people familiar with matters, should your threads be dismissed too?



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


according to people familiar with the matter

"Only the hairstylist knows for sure."




posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 08:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Just saw this bit of news drop:

Mulvaney Replacements?

There was also a tweet from Trump that was taken down almost immediatley confirming that he's mulling these candidates over.




Personally I'd prefer to see Conway get the job.


Bloomberg is a biased source !!!!!!!

from the link above:

according to people familiar with the matter
😃!!!!!!!

But sure, Mulvaney was probably placed in the sunburn for a reason.

And Conway would be better of course 😎



so when you present ' bombshells' from people familiar with matters, should your threads be dismissed too?

Says the one who almost never sources



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Wayfarer
Just saw this bit of news drop:

Mulvaney Replacements?

There was also a tweet from Trump that was taken down almost immediatley confirming that he's mulling these candidates over.




Personally I'd prefer to see Conway get the job.


Bloomberg is a biased source !!!!!!!

from the link above:

according to people familiar with the matter
😃!!!!!!!

But sure, Mulvaney was probably placed in the sunburn for a reason.

And Conway would be better of course 😎



so when you present ' bombshells' from people familiar with matters, should your threads be dismissed too?


Sure. Why not !! 😃 🐸




top topics



 
2

log in

join