It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Four Companies Control the World

page: 3
25
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: one4all
We all KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON NOW....


Actually, you have no clue whatsoever which is why you have contributed zero evidence to the discussion.





edit on 23-10-2019 by AugustusMasonicus because: 👁❤🍕




posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
You really thought John D. Quintonaire was going to be listed in the proxy statements?


I'm pretty sure when you made that Orignal Post you thought a bunch of super-wealthy people owned all those companies.


No, I understand now.

Nothing to see here.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: LookingAtMars

So you say.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 10:02 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




posted on Oct, 24 2019 @ 06:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: LookingAtMars

BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. Not shocked to see these four listed, particularly BlackRock, both my wife and myself have worked at companies that have been purchased by BlackRock at one point in time. I see their name routinely when I work just about anywhere. I would say that they're probably the largest out of the group based on my anecdotal experience.


I just think its weird, because the wrecked ship in lost was called the "black rock"

conspiracy , they control everything , even fictitious islands in tv shows



posted on Oct, 24 2019 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




And they would appear on the proxy statements if they had any actual serious holdings in those companies.


I wonder where we might find some of those names? Certainly they must be
involved with something somewhere to be on a proxy? But I would never disagree
with that. You are absolutely correct in your findings. Not even arguable. It just
seems there has to more to it.



And now that OP has a bit more experience on fact checking before writing
a thread on ATS. (not a bad thing) I would suggest he might comeback with
another thread on the same article. Only that it points out the articles
inaccuracies. And then sets the topic to finding out what companies these
families are involved with seriously. Because I'm not sure that would be on
topic here?





posted on Oct, 24 2019 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
I wonder where we might find some of those names?


You can get a full shareholder list from each publicly traded company, it's public knowledge as each transaction is registered with the SEC.



posted on Oct, 24 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: carsforkids
I wonder where we might find some of those names?


You can get a full shareholder list from each publicly traded company, it's public knowledge as each transaction is registered with the SEC.



Nice to see you rectified Augy….lol...lol. by the way you haven't proved a single thing you have said....I would not recommend anyone trust your word....maybe you should start backing up your BS WITH SOME LINKS AND FACTS.



posted on Oct, 24 2019 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: one4all

Try looking things up instead of running your mouth, the information is there for the non-lazy.



posted on Oct, 24 2019 @ 08:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: one4all

Try looking things up instead of running your mouth, the information is there for the non-lazy.


LOL...isn't that the pot calling the Kettle black....lol....Augie YOU are the lazy one who refuses to do legwork research or provide reasonable proof.Why no links.
edit on 24-10-2019 by one4all because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2019 @ 06:12 AM
link   
a reply to: one4all

One of us didn't post evidence in this thread and that would be you.

I'd tell you that was a nice try on your part but I'd be lying.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join