It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Despite the caustic nature of what was once heated debate, and is now turning into disputes, scientists all agree on one thing: It is impossible to categorically prove either theory.
...scientists all agree on one thing: It is impossible to categorically prove either theory. "Amid growing animosity, both sides agree that proving intelligent design in traditional scientific terms is next to impossible. "Can science show you whether God exists? No," said Wells."
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
They still haven't found the missing link.
Originally posted by TheWrAiTH
I don't believe the premise that PROVING EVOLUTION disproves INTELLIGENT DESIGN!!!
Originally posted by RANT
Metaphysicians are trying to force their way into science classes, when they should be proposing seperate philosophy classes. Philosophy classes where, I might add, all metaphysical theories are taught on equal footing for the benefit of learning perspective and critical thinking skills. That means teaching everything from Plato to Zen Bhuddism to Christianity to Existentialism.
Originally posted by mwm1331
So then freedm for sm, if you think God should be kept out of schools, Do you disagree with teaching compartive relgion as a way of fostering religous tolerance as well?
Originally posted by RANT
Metaphysicians are trying to force their way into science classes, when they should be proposing seperate philosophy classes. Philosophy classes where, I might add, all metaphysical theories are taught on equal footing for the benefit of learning perspective and critical thinking skills. That means teaching everything from Plato to Zen Bhuddism to Christianity to Existentialism.
Originally posted by soficrow
We are in BIG trouble but no one talks about the problem: mutation and evolution. Instead, they focus on 'theory' and creationism.
The crises are denied by denying the evolutionary process.
wecomeinpeace
In light of this, and considering that science is ultimately about exploring the unknown, it would seem to make sense to teach all theorie
After all, that is why they are called theories
Preposterous. Galileo was well wrecked by bookish biblical literalists and fundamentalists who put religion over science, much like IDers do now. They'd be rolling in their graves at your comments.
And I dare say Copernicus and Galileo would be turning in their graves if they knew that science had become the very one-eyed monster that it fought against for so long.
but I thought that natural selection has been pretty much proven to be valid, whereas evolution, particularly in regards to humans, has not.
They still haven't found the missing link.
Do they teach philosophy in high-schools these days?
Freedom_for_sum
That doesn't mean that scientitsts won't be able to prove God exists at some point in the future.
Originally posted by fledgling666
and call them all theories, since, of course, they are,
that just scares people to death doens't it?
Freedom_for_sum
That doesn't mean that scientitsts won't be able to prove God exists at some point in the future.
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
If we could tell peope from 1000 years ago that in the 20th century we would be flying through the air, traveling through space, be able to communicate with someone on the other side of the world (no the Earth is NOT flat! ) their response would likely be "impossible is impossible"
johannmon
In fact to properly address the teaching of the theory of evolution it is necessary to evaluate its weaknesses as well as its strengths
These strong points however are tempered by evolutions weakness in that the probability studies that have been done suggest it is mathematically impossible for the structures of even simple organisms to happen by random chance
Originally posted by soficrow
1. Microbes are evolving rapidly to create new strains against which we have NO immunity - some inside of 9 minutes - most of the mutations are spurred by chemical and other contaminations in our world;
2. People are suffering more and more mutations caused by environmental contaminations - some are visible, like two heads or fused digits, others are invisible and cause diseases that might take years to manifest;
3. Animals are mutating too, also caused by contaminations of our planet.
We are in BIG trouble but no one talks about the problem: mutation and evolution. Instead, they focus on 'theory' and creationism.
The crises are denied by denying the evolutionary process.
Looks like a communications strategy to me.
Originally posted by soficrow
The crises are denied by denying the evolutionary process.
Looks like a communications strategy to me.
.