It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WHY? Democrats Debate Who Is Best to Take On Trump and Isnt he going to be Impeached?

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 04:51 AM
link   
So why is this a front page story on MSN via The New York Times this fine Wednesday 16Oct2019 @ 5:31AM EST? I mean the fix is in for impeachment; isn't it? It's really just like what we did to Bernie and that 2016 election thingy for Hillary until James Comey showed up. I mean it was all in the bag. Then there is that pesky Electoral College. Ah that's right as the USA was founded by criminals for criminals so we need to destroy all text books and rewrite history along with those monuments, take the paintings down also. So what's so important about a text book as we also took out the queen of cooking back in the day, as in good ole Martha Stewart. She wrote books and then she got James Comey[ed] when he was in SDNY. Seems to me that James has an affinity for smack-down's on females doesn't he. I heard a rumor that Martha's issues was her Russian recipes being equated to Crimes Against Humanity and not some stock insider information.

So the above is ha ha funny? Look at what is being played out here by those who own, run and grind the MSM of America. An OBVIOUS 24 /7 Psyop on the Donald?

Democrats Debate

Whats worse is the 24 / 7 pysop being played on all of us by those privileged one percenters. That includes Billionaire Tom Stein. Hes a real piece of work. As many Anon's used to write; follow the money!!!

Tom Steyer’s Impeachment Campaign Is Building Him a Political Death Star




posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 05:04 AM
link   
Can't impeach without proof or support.
Both these are unsustainable or we would have seen a vote by now.

And then we'd be LOFAO at the shame. Which would be the only thing in the bag.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 05:30 AM
link   
Just read Pelosi said no impeachment on AOL



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 06:29 AM
link   
a reply to: musicismagic

Really I was just and their front web page and found nothing. You do mean AOL as America On Line?

AOL



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

The better question is why trump forced the Republicans to not have any challengers for trump.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 08:28 AM
link   
a reply to: odzeandennz

Same reason Obama did. Next easy question please.
edit on 16-10-2019 by Middleoftheroad because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 08:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: Waterglass

The better question is why trump forced the Republicans to not have any challengers for trump.



it's still his turn. or do you not understand how this works?



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 08:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: Waterglass

The better question is why trump forced the Republicans to not have any challengers for trump.


did he actually?
if he did how did he do so exactly?



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 09:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: Waterglass

The better question is why trump forced the Republicans to not have any challengers for trump.

Objection: assumes facts not in evidence.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 09:20 AM
link   
The House impeaches; the Senate acquits or finds guilty and removes.

All you Constitutionalists should read the Constitution sometime.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
The House impeaches; the Senate acquits or finds guilty and removes.

All you Constitutionalists should read the Constitution sometime.

Judging by your first line , others are not the ones that need to read the Constitution with comprehension.
Denying ignorance,
Why ?
ATS , baby



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Gryphon66
The House impeaches; the Senate acquits or finds guilty and removes.

All you Constitutionalists should read the Constitution sometime.

Judging by your first line , others are not the ones that need to read the Constitution with comprehension.
Denying ignorance,
Why ?
ATS , baby


LOL ... I'll be glad to address anything specific you care to bring up. What part of the Constitution do you find confusing?



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 10:59 AM
link   
a reply to: odzeandennz





The better question is why


The better question is why you don't write your own thread on that issue. As you seem unbalanced today. I heard that you lost your prairie oysters?


But the Republicans seem to want to hide the fact that two former governors and a former congressman are challenging President Donald Trump’s re-nomination. The GOP has held no official debates — and none is planned — though Business Insider, a financial news website, held what it billed as the first GOP debate last month. Two Trump foes, former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld and former Illinois Rep. Joe Walsh, took turns arguing why he should be impeached. On Sunday, the third GOP hopeful, former South Carolina governor and congressman Mark Sanford, disputed Walsh on CNN’s State of the Union, declaring it was important to “go through the process” before reaching a verdict. Meanwhile, several state Republican parties are doing their best to snuff out any sign of disunity, even though it’s obvious, if Trump stays in office, he’ll be renominated, given his nearly 90% job approval among Republicans.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

Bernie Sanders has the best anti-establishment public policies.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Waterglass

Bernie Sanders has the best anti-establishment public policies.



For example ... ?



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

The best anti-establishment policies coming directly from someone who makes policy for the establishment.

2nd




top topics



 
5

log in

join