It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Giuliani was paid $500K by indicted associate's

page: 7
14
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2019 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris



You think AG Barr is a dimwit?

nope
he made the correct determination on the muller report when muller did not
AG Barr is a straight shooter, right?



I think the fact that he signed off on the SDNY AG arresting these guys speaks to overwhelmingly damning evidence gathered by the Grand Jury that is investigating Rudy.

AG Barr's default is to defend the POTUS. The case laid out by the Grand Jury evidence must have been very, very strong.




posted on Oct, 17 2019 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Gordon Sondland breaks with Trump in impeachment testimony
www.politico.com...



posted on Oct, 17 2019 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Extorris
sounds like a lot of infighting
none of which would be crimes

having a different opinion on foreign policy direction is not a crime

remind me again who in our nation sets foreign policy please?



posted on Oct, 17 2019 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
sounds like a lot of infighting
none of which would be crimes

having a different opinion on foreign policy direction is not a crime

remind me again who in our nation sets foreign policy please?



Rudy Giuliani?



posted on Oct, 17 2019 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
sounds like a lot of infighting
none of which would be crimes

having a different opinion on foreign policy direction is not a crime

remind me again who in our nation sets foreign policy please?



Rudy Giuliani?

really
that is an interesting answer



posted on Oct, 18 2019 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Extorris

that isn't necessairly the case. Grand Juries have indicted plenty of times on what seemed like flimsy evidece because of how a procesuter presents that evideice and how good of a story they tell.

I'm not saying this is flimsy, I'm just saying that a GJ indicnement isn't all it's cracked up to be and doesn't make a case cut and dry.



posted on Oct, 18 2019 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Thanatos0042

I am not suggesting the evidence is strong because it originated with a Grand Jury.

I am suggesting the evidence is strong because AG Bill Barr was in NYC and talked through the evidence with the NY AG and personally gave him the sign off to arrest these guys. Considering AG Barr knew there would be fall-out given this involved several Pols and the President's personal Attorney, the evidence would have had to be indisputable to warrant a "go-ahead" by AG Barr.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join