It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A New-To-Me Theory on 9/11

page: 5
25
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 06:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Salander

Kwahakev tried this game and posted this picture.

originally posted by: kwakakev


So far, you haven’t even provide any evidence concerning cut steel columns.






If you are not going to be serious about this i am not going to help you with your silly games.


One. If explosives hurled this massive piece of building, the explosion wound have been massive. The resultant pressure wave would have been obvious, and ruptured eardrums throughout manhattan. There is still intact windows in the building part of the WTC fell into. The pressure waves from explosions hurling ton pieces of building would have completely knocked out windows.

Two. The piece contains broken welds, with no indication of being worked by cutting charges.

Three, why would cutting charges hurl large pieces of building?

Four, the pieces are explained by the tumbling action of the structural steel.

edit on 20-10-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

edit on 20-10-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed




posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

If explosives did not hurl those pieces NF, then what did?



posted on Oct, 22 2019 @ 07:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux

If explosives did not hurl those pieces NF, then what did?


What proof do you have that explosives hurled pieces vs being pushed out by collapsing floors? And the toppling of large vertical columns?

This is what happens when there is actual shrapnel from actual explosives with no care in properly trapping demolitions shrapnel.



Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion

www.canberratimes.com.au...

Seconds after the explosion on that Sunday afternoon, Katie was was killed instantly by a steel fragment sent flying from 430 metres across the lake. It was thought to be travelling at 140km/h.




Canberra Hospital Implosion 1997
m.youtube.com...


The sound of explosions is clearly heard above the collapse of the building and echos about.

The steel fragment that instantly killed Katie was ejected 430 meters from what looks like an eight story building. How many meters was the steel fragment ejected out vs how tall the building was?



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Oh My Goodness! Out of all the silly posts you have offered here, this one takes the cake.

Those pieces were pushed out by collapsing floors? ROFLMAO

Desperate is as desperate does.



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 03:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux

Oh My Goodness! Out of all the silly posts you have offered here, this one takes the cake.

Those pieces were pushed out by collapsing floors? ROFLMAO

Desperate is as desperate does.


You going to talk about actual Evidence? Or just have a conniption fit?

Again... the actual whole argument.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Salander

Kwahakev tried this game and posted this picture.

originally posted by: kwakakev


So far, you haven’t even provide any evidence concerning cut steel columns.






If you are not going to be serious about this i am not going to help you with your silly games.


One. If explosives hurled this massive piece of building, the explosion wound have been massive. The resultant pressure wave would have been obvious, and ruptured eardrums throughout manhattan. There is still intact windows in the building part of the WTC fell into. The pressure waves from explosions hurling ton pieces of building would have completely knocked out windows.

Two. The piece contains broken welds, with no indication of being worked by cutting charges.

Three, why would cutting charges hurl large pieces of building?

Four, the pieces are explained by the tumbling action of the structural steel.


originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux

If explosives did not hurl those pieces NF, then what did?


What proof do you have that explosives hurled pieces vs being pushed out by collapsing floors? And the toppling of large vertical columns?

This is what happens when there is actual shrapnel from actual explosives with no care in properly trapping demolitions shrapnel.



Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion

www.canberratimes.com.au...

Seconds after the explosion on that Sunday afternoon, Katie was was killed instantly by a steel fragment sent flying from 430 metres across the lake. It was thought to be travelling at 140km/h.




Canberra Hospital Implosion 1997
m.youtube.com...


The sound of explosions is clearly heard above the collapse of the building and echos about.

The steel fragment that instantly killed Katie was ejected 430 meters from what looks like an eight story building. How many meters was the steel fragment ejected out vs how tall the building was?


edit on 23-10-2019 by neutronflux because: Fixed quotes



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 03:58 PM
link   
Whoever posted the pictures, those pictures show the official story to be pure bovine excrement, and your claim that those massive pieces were "pushed out" by collapsing floors is absurd to the point of being comical.
edit on 23-10-2019 by Salander because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2019 @ 04:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
Whoever posted the pictures, those pictures show the official story to be pure bovine excrement, and your claim that those massive pieces were "pushed out" by collapsing floors is absurd to the point of being comical.


And yet, there is no indication those pieces were worked on by explosives.

There is no evidence in the audio/video evidence of explosions period.

But pieces of vertical columns tumbling outward is right there in the video evidence.



posted on Oct, 31 2019 @ 10:13 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

You trust the government sheesh lol. You’re their greatest propagandist.



posted on Nov, 1 2019 @ 06:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: neutronflux

You trust the government sheesh lol. You’re their greatest propagandist.


Quote where I ever said trust the government. I don’t trust a bunch of truth movement charlatans too.

Example. I came to believe thermal stress caused structural failures resulting in the collapse initiation for the WTC 1 and 2.

Which should I find more credible:

Fizzle no flash bombs as pushed by Richard Gauge?

Thermite paint and ceiling tiles as pushed by Dr. Jones?

Jet holograms with missiles and lasers?

WTC nukes?

WTC fire extinguisher bombs?

Dr Wood’s dustification?

Plasma attack?


Which one are you going to champion and argue?


edit on 1-11-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

edit on 1-11-2019 by neutronflux because: Fixed more



posted on Nov, 1 2019 @ 06:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Lazarus Short

Funny the slide of the presentation you linked to didn’t list potential energy?



Potential energy

en.m.wikipedia.org...

In physics, potential energy is the energy held by an object because of its position relative to other objects, stresses within itself, its electric charge, or other factors.[1][2]



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:41 PM
link   
Strange theory!



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join