It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ex-National Security Council official testifying to Congress

page: 2
5
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Oraculi




These are good news for ALL Americans.


i completely disagree. they should follow normal protocols for impeachment...step 1 of which is to hold a vote.

they are making it up as they go along, pretending they are following the rules, then complaining about people not cooperating.




posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:00 PM
link   


your reference is confusing
a reply to: shooterbrody

You are right... when getting crowds to chant "lock her up" it is his right to free speech... It does kind of go against the constitution right? She has not been tried nor convicted of any crime.. right? do you agree?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:01 PM
link   


they are making it up as they go along, pretending they are following the rules, then complaining about people not cooperating.
a reply to: smkymcnugget420
What rules are they not following? since you know so much?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



they are making it up as they go along, pretending they are following the rules, then complaining about people not cooperating.
a reply to: smkymcnugget420
What rules are they not following? since you know so much?



What rules ARE they following anyway ? 👁️‍🗨️👃👁️‍🗨️



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07



It does kind of go against the constitution right?

howso?
free speech is free speech?
or is some more free than others?
or again, has he instructed the ag to do such?

is there some anti crowd chant in the constitution I missed?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:06 PM
link   


they should follow normal protocols
a reply to: smkymcnugget420

Normal protocol is for the President to release his taxes.... you all say he does not have to follow protocol... why change of heart now? why?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



your reference is confusing
a reply to: shooterbrody

You are right... when getting crowds to chant "lock her up" it is his right to free speech... It does kind of go against the constitution right? She has not been tried nor convicted of any crime.. right? do you agree?



No... I can say OJ simpson should have gone to prison for accessory to the murder of his wife... and so could the president but until he orders someone to do it nothing has been done except an exercise of the 1st amendment.



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:16 PM
link   


howso? free speech is free speech? or is some more free than others? or again, has he instructed the ag to do such? is there some anti crowd chant in the constitution I missed?
a reply to: shooterbrody

No you are right... the President of the United States advocating locking up an American citizen without being charged with a crime is perfectly normal.



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07
normal isnt really your unconstitutional tho?
whose definition of your "normal"?
obama was in no way "normal"



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:25 PM
link   


No... I can say OJ simpson should have gone to prison for accessory to the murder of his wife... and so could the president but until he orders someone to do it nothing has been done except an exercise of the 1st amendment.
a reply to: Irishhaf
you guys are right, i am wrong...


The President of the United States is allowed to talk # about anybody, but if I criticize any of you snowflakes the moderators take my comment down.... because this site holds me to a higher standard than you all do the President of the United States... lol...



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



howso? free speech is free speech? or is some more free than others? or again, has he instructed the ag to do such? is there some anti crowd chant in the constitution I missed?
a reply to: shooterbrody

No you are right... the President of the United States advocating locking up an American citizen without being charged with a crime is perfectly normal.


Better to say it and nothing else, than to say oh I dont know drone strike him in another country....



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:29 PM
link   


normal isnt really your unconstitutional tho? whose definition of your "normal"? obama was in no way "normal"

what does that even mean?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:32 PM
link   


Better to say it and nothing else, than to say oh I dont know drone strike him in another country....
a reply to: Irishhaf
should we hope you are in the house getting drone struck?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07

You made it already, who else can we expect ?



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oraculi
Associated Press

Personal note: I'm getting messaged to see if I am "Ante". I am not Ante and I don't know who that is, but thank you for the messages. It is nice to feel welcome.


The member you are referring to made no secret his/her political leanings, but that member didn't lie. They also had a good understanding of government processes. It never felt like emotional propaganda. I don't recall all the psuedo-patriotic and melodramatic appeals to emotion. In all, anyone who is confusing you with that member isn't paying attention and I hope nobody continues to make that mistake.



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07
You moved from unconstitutional to not normal.
Normal is subjective.
People in Arizona think 85 f is normal.
People in maine not so much.



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

Yeah. That guy had class. He did get taken for a ride during the height of the Russia hoax, but he wasn't so....fake about it.



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 05:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



howso? free speech is free speech? or is some more free than others? or again, has he instructed the ag to do such? is there some anti crowd chant in the constitution I missed?
a reply to: shooterbrody

No you are right... the President of the United States advocating locking up an American citizen without being charged with a crime is perfectly normal.



The only worse thing would be actually detaining political opponents as part of a secret fake impeachment inquiry that hasn't been voted on.




Tlaib says Democrats have discussed detaining White House officials who don't testify


Link



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Oraculi

Why closed doors?? He said he would comply in an open and public hearings. So why the closed doors?? So they can just make up more he said she said and not cite a single piece of evidence??

I cannot wait for crow farm 2.0, I suspect much less of you all will be willing to dine on crow on the second pass around.



posted on Oct, 14 2019 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



Better to say it and nothing else, than to say oh I dont know drone strike him in another country....
a reply to: Irishhaf
should we hope you are in the house getting drone struck?


Got it... you are an orange man bad person, no biggie have a nice day wallowing in hate.
*Hint* it wasnt orange man that legalized drone striking a US citizen.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join