It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Damning study about WiFi and health effects

page: 3
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2019 @ 10:11 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

I have been saying for a while now that the human brain/body was not designed to be bombarded by electromagnetic waves, non-stop 24/7.




posted on Oct, 15 2019 @ 11:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: 727Sky

I have been saying for a while now that the human brain/body was not designed to be bombarded by electromagnetic waves, non-stop 24/7.


It is tho.

Your body has been bombarded with EM waves every second of your life.

The entire universe is permeated with radiation including our cozy safe spot called Earth...



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

And that's what causes us to eventually die--an accumulation of harm caused by radiation.

And we know that concentrated radiation makes it happen faster, just as they learned way back when as cops conducting speed traps with radar guns developed testicular cancer quickly. When not using the guns, they rested them in their crotch, a good thing to do ONLY if you wish to get cancer.

Cell phones near the body have the same general effect, as does operating aircraft weather radar on the ground pointing at those in front of the airplane.

Using sunscreen is supposed to ameliorate the effects of excess solar radiation.



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 10:26 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

OK, how about highly focused EM radiation in the giga and mega hertz range?



posted on Oct, 16 2019 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: muzzleflash

OK, how about highly focused EM radiation in the giga and mega hertz range?


Not all EM radiation is the same in terms of danger, the wavelength of radio is on the low energy side of the spectrum.

Visible light is in the middle of the spectrum and is potentially many times more energetic than high frequency radio waves.

Yes a radio wave can interact with matter it passes through but it's minimal, a regular flashlight or ceiling light seems to pose more of a threat in terms of em radiation (non thermal).

It seems to me, very clear, that we'd need a completely new concept/theory of electromagnetism/light in order to justify any cancer/molecular damage model for radio waves specifically.

*IF* wifi radios pose any non thermal danger to our biological flesh - than centuries of science and thinking go all down the toilet and we need a complete new scientific model of explanation.

The govt organizations were covering their rears by saying "it might pose danger", even tho we're talking .00000001% or something where a typical x-ray machine would be a full 1%, way way more dangerous.

Radio is the lowest energy EM wave.



posted on Oct, 18 2019 @ 02:45 PM
link   
I am 50 pages into an 800 page book that are the recorded discussions and interviews that took place recently, called the 5G Crisis Summit Transcripts.

Those being interviewed are all scientists of one sort or the other, extremely knowledgeable in the area of wireless radiation and such.

They have done radiation experiments on rats, years ago. We've always tested rats because in many way they are like humans. And we've tested them for damage from radiation, and we've seen it.

Proceeding with 5G without testing is suicidal for a species. We need to slow down and formulate a rational public policy.




top topics
 
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join