It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former ambassador to Ukraine says Trump pushed to oust her

page: 8
10
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

The entire state department were all in agreement that Lushenko was corrupt.
You know... before he became a great and fair prosecutor who was treated badly ...Please.


I am so tired of these appeals to the state department. They dont set policy, trump does. Its clear they were upset trump had a policy they didnt like.

Why did the state dept only pressure Ukrainian prosecutors to stop looking at people interfering to help hillary, or that were getting money from Obama or soros?

Weird how every time a Ukrainian prosecutor was investigating people connected to Obama, the state dept thinks they are corrupt.

Oh and joe biden thought Lutsenko was "solid"




posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Trumps tweets would not have been intimidating if Schiff did not break in and share it Live to the witness. Just as the ambassador would never have known Trump discussed her with the Ukraine President if Schiff did not ask to see the transcript of the phone call.

Who actually is trying to intimidate?



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:32 AM
link   
gotta throw Putin in there, you know, because Russia



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme



Yet the dems have spread false allegations about the President for 3 years. Strange she doesnt think that is damaging to our diplomacy
a reply to: Grambler

Know whats even more strange....
No one flippin asked her about this because it has nothing to do with this impeachment hearing.




Yovanavicth says she is upset that her ouster meant state dept. was weakened at the time it needed to be string the most.

This is absurd, is she claiming her replacement is imcompetent?

And you are putting words in her mouth. She was referring to a new regime with a new ambassador unfamiliar with Ukraine.
what is even more strange is she has no relations to the July 25th call, AT ALL.

She also has a political bias and was your typical disgruntled employee.

She was rightfully FIRED 😚

Otherwise, her being up there is about as useful as a screen door on a sub.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:34 AM
link   
What we have here is a lack of questioning to establish facts, but more about expressing feelings. It’s like watching group therapy sessions of who do you think made you feel like a loser in life.

External blame laying to ease your feels...sad really.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:34 AM
link   
Now the dems are arguing that investigating Ukrainian interference, that was admitted by Leschenko in the msm, helps russia. This is what this testimony is about, discrediting any investigation into interference that helped dems in 2016 election.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
What we have here is a lack of questioning to establish facts, but more about expressing feelings. It’s like watching group therapy sessions of who do you think made you feel like a loser in life.

External blame laying to ease your feels...sad really.


Someone should play back this part and see how many times she was asked how this "made her feel"........



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
gotta throw Putin in there, you know, because Russia
All according to script, researched phrases that emotionally hit the best for large swaths of your typical low info voter 😌



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:37 AM
link   
And here we have it, it was ok for Biden to use 1 billion dollars to extort Ukraine into firing the prosecutor looking into his sons company cause other countries leaders said it was ok.

And Biden was helping making an investigation into his sons company more thorough.

Hahaha!



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:37 AM
link   
Schiff once again stonewalling



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

No didn't you pay attention: She said that she wasn't aware of Bleeding Eye Joe bragging about forcing the issue. So even though everyone here on ATS has seen the video of him doing that, she didn't. Now she's sad.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:41 AM
link   
As a side note:
I wonder why she looks very worried about certain statements she's making while eyeballing the GOP side of the room? Does she know that those statements are going to get picked apart, or is there something else afoot here?



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:42 AM
link   
This person was one of Hillary's key people when Hillary was Sec. of State.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
This person was one of Hillary's key people when Hillary was Sec. of State.
Oooh??

Would explain why she is a worry wort/nervous nancy....ok boomer, ugh....
edit on 15-11-2019 by Arnie123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   
Well, that was a whole lot of nothingness. Except for Shiff head throwing his weight around.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Many people stationed in Europe while Hillary ran things could tell you of the OPEN bribery and graft being done, especially in and around Eastern Europe.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:48 AM
link   
Another note. I like how Schiff and the Democrats have the entirety of the questioning in the first session, knowing the attention span of the average person is zero, there are a lot of people who will now tune out, or just look at the headlines generated from this first session and be done with it.........good way to make the rebuttal look less imporant


also, when will this clown (Schiff) actually respond to a Point of Order instead of getting bug eyed and dropping the gavel on it??
edit on am1111201919America/Chicago15p09am by annoyedpharmacist because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
Another note. I like how Schiff and the Democrats have the entirety of the questioning in the first session, knowing the attention span of the average person is zero, there are a lot of people who will now tune out, or just look at the headlines generated from this first session and be done with it.........good way to make the rebuttal look less imporant


also, when will this clown (Schiff) actually respond to a Point of Order instead of getting bug eyed and dropping the gavel on it??


The Gentleman is not recognized! Bang!!!!



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:52 AM
link   
found this on the twitters and it gave me a chuckle

twitter.com...



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 09:53 AM
link   
Is it halftime for readjusting the playbook? Because three and out isn’t going to get them into field goal range with their weak-ankled kickers.




top topics



 
10
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join