It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why don’t black holes lead to a hard rock? Thought play

page: 3
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2019 @ 04:41 PM
link   
there is no way to tell what is behind the event horizon of a black hole, because nothing can escape. We only have mathematical models to describe what MIGHT be there. All the math says the matter collapses down to an infinitely small point. Physicists don’t like that answer, but that’s what the math says.




posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 07:17 PM
link   
a reply to: YouSir




Ummm...so what bumhole would be representative of a...galaxy center super massive black hole...?


hmmm it's seems you have the orifices confused, yet then you state;





I don't think...(meaning I don't know...but will comment anyways)... there are stars that would be massive enough to qualify as the big butt...



Yes, AFAWK there Are "Super Massive stars" in Our Reality, BUT at this moment it 'time', UNTIL
we earthlings have a 'comprehensive' explanation of "dark matter" (to name just One "interstellar anomaly" we 'know of' BUT know Nothing about, including 'black holes") our assertions as to the 'hows and whys' of Most celestial activity in as much a mystery now as it was when first 'discovered'

Until the 'sciences' are taught sincerely students will continue to believe the Bullshoot UNTIL they are in a "need to know" position, and even then . . . what they are told is only Part of The Truth

I'll listen to the person who CAN link "sub atomic reality" with Real World Macro Reality", which at the moment "they" can't.

FFS the Human body is ~40% Bacteria! So far very few people have even asked the question; "what is all this bacteria DOing?"

I refuse to accept another's "opinion" even if they are a "specialist" in a field like astronomy

Do YOU believe that NASA has 'forgotten' how to get to the moon AND "lost" ALL the related data . . . or did they never go?



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 07:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Archivalist

this person gets it;




This implies the possibility for a catalyst from outside of space-time, or that space-time can infinitely reset itself from within it's own confines. Our concept of infinity is dwarfed by the possibility of ANYTHING existing outside of space-time. That allows for an infinite number of our "Universe" to exist beyond our perception.


I concur



new topics
 
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join