It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Rockets Into 3rd Place On PredictIt

page: 3
16
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Wow, what a heartless, lying snob. She'll say anything, including lying, if she thinks it will garner votes. Pathetic.




posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
I really wish people would stop being so cocky and take this crap seriously. If she does run, then there's a chance no matter how remotely they might figure out a way to rig it so she wins.

That should terrify the hell out of everyone. It certainly does me.


Don't EVER say that. Not even in jest.

You'll jinx us all...



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

It wasn't in jest. I'm honestly terrified.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

The thing you all have to remember is, Hillary doesn't plan on winning by the rules. They know they can't. They need to make up stuff about Trump and also push the electoral college unfair stories.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:40 PM
link   
I'm a winner winner chicken dinner


thank you thank you


I called it!! 🎇🎇🎇🎇🥇🥇🥇🥇



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
Seems like the odds of Hillary Clinton entering the 2020 presidential race are increasing...at least on PredictIt, a New Zealand-based prediction market, where users can make or lose money based on US political events.




When you consider Sander's recent health scare, Biden's Ukraine scandal and now Warren's "pregnancy lie," maybe the political gamblers are on to something.

I know someone who thinks this would be a great idea:



This must coincide with the Doomsday clock.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Riffrafter
a reply to: carewemust

For those that are twitter deprived - here's her quote:




So Elizabeth Warren was asked about Mollie Tibbetts being murdered by an illegal...

Her reply was:

“I know this is hard for her family, but they have to remember that we need to focus on real problems like illegal immigrants not being able to see their kids”

Let that sink in.


Unbelievable.

She's not only mindless - she's completely out of touch with how the average person would feel about an asinine comment like that.

I'm glad this is coming out early in the game. If I was her opponent, I would save this and publish it every time she attacked me.


Ho. Lee. Crap. That is quite possibly the most tone-deaf comment I've ever heard. It's like telling a woman who's been raped that she should think about how hard being arrested will be on her rapist.

I think we just found Warren's "basket of deplorables" comment right there.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Riffrafter

It wasn't in jest. I'm honestly terrified.


I know.

Me too...

I *hate* that woman. I can't believe she's not in jail for all of the criminal things she's done.

I'm sure the family of the Benghazi ambassador along with the families of the other 3 that were killed when she left them to get hacked up with no help from our Secretary of State, wish her a fate that probably can't even be described.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny




posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Riffrafter

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats are begging either Hillary or Michelle Obama to run. There was a special on TV last night to that effect.


Are you serious?!?

Was that special on MSNBC?



No MSNBC is special,

yellow short bus,

special

Keep the chinstrap tight



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 03:53 PM
link   
That's one smart bookie who runs the site, putting her up taking the bets and then fleecing them for their absolute stupidity for placing such a bet when the odds in reality should be about 50000 to 1.

Some people should never gamble. Idiots.
edit on 8-10-2019 by CthruU because: 1



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 04:14 PM
link   
If she's running, it means they think they can steal the election.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: jjkenobi
a reply to: shawmanfromny

The thing you all have to remember is, Hillary doesn't plan on winning by the rules. They know they can't. They need to make up stuff about Trump and also push the electoral college unfair stories.


I sure hope it takes more than a few months to enact a constitutional amendment.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 05:33 PM
link   
If she did run, it would be because the money people behind Trump were paying her to do it.

Sure would be nice if the U.S. had a strong, well-funded third party that wasn't dominated by single-issue crackpots.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 06:14 PM
link   
the only way the DNC runs clinton is if they really really really want an actual landslide win for trump.

her entering would immediately anger bernies voters again after how the last election went down

it would probably take away one of the dem front runners as she would probally pick either warren or biden of all people for VP as other then perhaps harris i cant see her offering any of them a vp slot

trump would be so pleased the trolling would be hilarious

what would clinton be able to offer or campaign on that the others haven't covered in their policies?

we allready have the socialist duo of sanders and warren offering all the free stuff and health care for illegals and open borders

then there is beto who says hes gonna take our guns and smiled while he said it ,yang who is literally tossing out money in hopes of buying votes

i mean i guess Clinton could offer to continue over seas wars and be the face of the dems running un electable career politicians but i guess those that want bill prowling for more interns may like her running again keep in mind running hillary is about 40% of why we got trump some people voted for trump not because they thought he was the best option but because of how terrible hillary was



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

eh its fashionable to keep throwing third parties under the buss still or did you miss all the blame the third parties got for "helping elect trump" hell the republicans made it eaiser for 3rd parties to run in texas and the dems flipped out about it calling it voter suppression and meddling you know letting a viable third party run is some how bad to them

www.nbcnews.com...

But under a rule that went into effect this month, the threshold for third parties to get on the ballot in Texas was lowered in a way that watchdog groups, nonpartisan experts and progressive activists all say is designed to siphon votes from Democratic candidates and boost the prospects of the GOP in contests where the margin of victory in 2020 is expected to be razor-thin. “This is part of a very clear strategy by the Texas GOP to keep the demographic changes we’re seeing in Texas from being reflected at the ballot box,” said Anthony Gutierrez, the executive director of the Texas branch of the government watchdog group Common Cause. “This is one of the ways they could use a third-party candidacy to knock off a percentage point or two from a Democrat, allowing Republicans to retain power for a bit longer than maybe they otherwise would have.”
so right in the dems own words 3rd parties running must only be running to sabotage the dems?

en.wikipedia.org... oddly enough not to many independents are running in 2020 with 10 libertarian candidates (one vermin supreme and another john macaffe lol)
7 green party members so it looks like the libertarians that ran during trumps elections last time aren't running so no siphoning of republican votes as i had never heard of any of the lower 3rd party candidates running before in my life but the green party may take a few from what ever dem wins the nomination out of the circus



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 06:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Blue Shift
[...] the green party may take a few from what ever dem wins the nomination out of the circus

The Green Party will always be equated in my mind (and because I have few original thoughts, probably many others) as a party of privileged hippie ecofascists. But see, that's not my problem, it's theirs. Maybe they should change their color to something more appealing and less charged. Blue, maybe. Like the Shift.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Puppylove

Can the woman even walk these days?

Every photo is of her sitting down, pillows
behind her back. Seriously, how could
she even get up on the stage?

A stretcher?



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jefferton
Awesome. If she enters the race it's a done deal for Trump.

Not that it wasn't already..


Jefferton, did you walkaway and hop on the train?




posted on Oct, 9 2019 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Blue Shift
If she did run, it would be because the money people behind Trump were paying her to do it.

Sure would be nice if the U.S. had a strong, well-funded third party that wasn't dominated by single-issue crackpots.


The last time a 3rd party candidate made a serious run at the WHite House was Ross Perot in 1992. He formed the reform party and won 19% of the popular vote. Many people say it was because of him that Bush lost to Clinton.

Judging by my wife and I they're probably right. We both voted for Perot in that election.

But in hindsight, Monica Lewinsky aside, I think Clinton was good for this country. He was a Dem but in my opinion he was more Center-left than full on left Dem. And the economy boomed under his leadership, my personal economy included - so I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't say I thought he was a good President.

Of course, your mileage may vary...void where prohibited...etc.




top topics



 
16
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join