-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -21-

a reply to: LanceCorvette

FBI officials threatened Flynn with malicious prosecution of his son, for FARA violations.

originally posted by: butcherguy
As far as the son goes, the people Flynn is dealing with (black hats) will not have any qualms about planting child porn on a loved ones computer in order to secure a guilty plea by blackmail. That is a difficult charge to fight when you are dealing with an alphabet agency that can pull it off easily and cover its tracks.

The "planting evidence" trick doesn't work anymore, since Federal court decisions have considered the fact govt agencies have the ability to this, as evidenced by the Vault 7 hacker tools.

a reply to: MetalThunder

That's an interesting connection. In that #7 Q post, there is one ampersand (Obama & his cabinet). I wonder if that means that seven members of his cabinet are implicated along with Obama.

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: butcherguy
As far as the son goes, the people Flynn is dealing with (black hats) will not have any qualms about planting child porn on a loved ones computer in order to secure a guilty plea by blackmail. That is a difficult charge to fight when you are dealing with an alphabet agency that can pull it off easily and cover its tracks.

The "planting evidence" trick doesn't work anymore, since Federal court decisions have considered the fact govt agencies have the ability to this, as evidenced by the Vault 7 hacker tools.

VAULT 7 in the news AGAIN ......

Former CIA employee Josh Schulte, who is accused of leaking the “Vault 7” files to WikiLeaks, urged a federal court to rule the Espionage Act is unconstitutional. He also asked the court to dismiss the Espionage Act charges against him.

The files Schulte allegedly released brought scrutiny to the CIA’s hacking arsenal, which targeted smartphones and computers. A program called “Weeping Angel,” that allowed the CIA to attack Samsung F8000 TVs and convert them into spying devices was exposed. They also showed how the CIA targeted Microsoft Windows, as well as Signal and WhatsApp users, with malware.....

The Trump administration has charged WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange with violating the Espionage Act, which makes him the first journalist to be charged under the law. This fact is conspicuously missing from the motion from Schulte’s attorneys.

Schulte’s attorneys may not want to appear to confirm details in Schulte’s case by expressing alarm over the case against Assange..........

FORME R CIA EMPLOYEE WHO ALLEGEDLY DISCLOSED ‘VAULT 7’ FILES TO WIKILEAKS CHALLENGES ESPIONAGE ACT CHARGES - November 5, 2019

BOOOM
Just in case you miss it

www.grassley.senate.gov...

Monsters don't always look like we think they do.

defensemaven.io... wAR2zI02kG40yftK6kJ4KpYua5JvmNLxKJSuGqLZJg-v9BtygdS3Y-5mCQUw

a reply to: MetalThunder

Good catch MT.

Worth pointing out that #7 is also the FIRST Q post to include an AMPERSAND.

I have been considering the effects of arrests and indictments on the general public and have come to the conclusion that it is unlikely that unsettling events will happen before the first of the year.
1. The public anxiety would be high if such happened before Christmas/Hanukah holidays and give the impression that the Administration is uncaring of the public. Military governance right before holidays would certainly be unpopular.
2. January and February events would happen in more uncomfortable weather, especially in the northern states. It is tougher to riot in the cold than in hot summer.
From drop #34 "On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted. Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out."

What if 11.3 and 11.6 were really 1.13 and 1.16, or 3.11 and 6.11. The 6.11 date would refute the bad weather argument against rioting but what's good for rioters is also good for suppression.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: MetalThunder

That's an interesting connection. In that #7 Q post, there is one ampersand (Obama & his cabinet). I wonder if that means that seven members of his cabinet are implicated along with Obama.

How about this for further thinking ???


Obama's Inner Circle – June 2008

The innermost circle that the Post assembled (which can easily be viewed in the accompanying graphic) is comprised of 7 people, all of whom are minorities.

Four of the seven—John W. Rogers Jr., Valerie B. Jarrett, Eric Whitaker and Martin Nesbitt—are African American. The other three—David Axelrod, James Crown and Penny S. Pritzker—are Jewish. ………..

On the "11.3" and "11.4" notation. For memory:

we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4)

(From Drop # 34).

Odd in the sense that such notation is not USA government standard. Government documents would be typically be in the format 11/3 and 11/4 (and normally with year noted as well). The notation used is common to continental Europe and denotes 11 March and 11 April, respectively. Other US government notation could be fully spelled out ("11 March" or "11 Mar") ... but that dot notation is peculiar for any kind of government communications in the USA.

Scanning other Q drops, I don't see that notation, but I did not do a comprehensive look.

I also wonder if it is a date at all. Yes, the date of Drop 34 is 1 November 2017, so it is tempting to assume the notation refers to 3 and 4 November. But what if it refers to an actions list or paragraphs in some document?

Cheers

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

I also wonder if it is a date at all. Yes, the date of Drop 34 is 1 November 2017, so it is tempting to assume the notation refers to 3 and 4 November. But what if it refers to an actions list or paragraphs in some document?

I have wondered this many times. It sounds more like something you would find in a reference to a Title in a Code of Laws and a subtitle or part....like, Title 11 Part 3.

AllBullChannel

I’ve had this story for three years. I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts.

“It was unbelievable what we had, Clinton, we had everything.”

It is fun reconciling after the facts have been revealed. This is why only a fool sees the fourth estate as anything but a enabler.

***I'd like to point out the use of the terms "no one" or "nobody" or "everyone" or this all inclusive terms used as mind control points. Those terms are used ALL the time with Q folks to debase.

This is a HUGE RED flag that the engagement is disingenuous at best. Someone once said to me "there are no studies showing microwave ovens are bad for your health" and my response was "you've read everything ever written, in all languages - even not published, on the topic?"

"I haven't seen" does not equal "none exist".

a reply to: Trillium

From your linked article:

Sheriff Ard said he had always considered Dennis to be a family member and a friend.

Really? So, Sheriff Ard had absolutely NO IDEA what Dennis, his "family member" and "friend" (including his wife/accomplice Cynthia), was up to? No clue?

I suppose it's possible that Dennis and Cynthia were really good at keeping their 'little secret' hidden from discovery; but, my skeptical side says to investigate further.

What if it's a 'ring'?

Is this David Rothschild tweet unusual to draw attention to the Tarmac meeting? Is he throwing Bill Clinton under a bus?

AG Barr (along with SoS Pompeo, SoE Perry) flies around world extorting foreign countries to help Trump's 2020 election campaign. But, I want to hear more about the time AG Lynch chatted about grandkids, for 15 minutes, with President Clinton.
11:10 AM · Nov 6, 2019

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

I also wonder if it is a date at all. Yes, the date of Drop 34 is 1 November 2017, so it is tempting to assume the notation refers to 3 and 4 November. But what if it refers to an actions list or paragraphs in some document?

I have wondered this many times. It sounds more like something you would find in a reference to a Title in a Code of Laws and a subtitle or part....like, Title 11 Part 3.

It is all three and more, depending on what coordinates are set by the map. Some are legal codes IIRC, as well as dates but we don't know the exact reference until the coordinates are pointed to by Q+ or "news unlocks..." Map isn't linear - that is Q confirmed.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Similar to something like this:

Contents
1 Titles of Rules
1.1 Title I – Scope of the FRCP
1.2 Title II – Commencement of Suits
1.3 Title III – Pleadings and Motions
1.4 Title IV – Parties
1.5 Title V – Discovery
1.6 Title VI – Trial
1.7 Title VII – Judgment
1.8 Title VIII – Provisional and Final Remedies
1.9 Title IX – Special Proceedings
1.10 Title X. District Courts and Clerks: Conducting Business; Issuing Orders
1.11 Title XI. General Provisions
1.12 Title XIII – Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
On the "11.3" and "11.4" notation. For memory:

we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4)

(From Drop # 34).

Odd in the sense that such notation is not USA government standard. Government documents would be typically be in the format 11/3 and 11/4 (and normally with year noted as well). The notation used is common to continental Europe and denotes 11 March and 11 April, respectively. Other US government notation could be fully spelled out ("11 March" or "11 Mar") ... but that dot notation is peculiar for any kind of government communications in the USA.

Scanning other Q drops, I don't see that notation, but I did not do a comprehensive look.

I also wonder if it is a date at all. Yes, the date of Drop 34 is 1 November 2017, so it is tempting to assume the notation refers to 3 and 4 November. But what if it refers to an actions list or paragraphs in some document?

Cheers

Reconsidering 11.3/11.4 [I had wondered about it like QOS and probably many others but since it said "on," I thought date also.] Maybe 11.3 and 11.4 are referring to the safeguards. If we remove both numbers from the sentence it reads:
"we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta"

QOS has a good thought about laws, protocols, SOP's, EO's, etc. Do they refer to Presidential authorities? Note that operations are to occur when POTUS is on AF1 and "out of the country" so I have been watching that, as likely the guilty have, too. Given the recent "troop withdrawal" that relaxed the austere scholar before he took off in all directions at once, this may be that also. Why would Q provide such information as date and specific conditions?

a reply to: crankyoldman

Also note in regards to the "11.3" etc. notation, that although anons mention it again (as quoted in Q drops), I never saw Q directly confirm the notation as meaning a date. Q hints at it, but as far as I can see, does not confirm the "11" meant the month of November.

So much for my data skills -- back to your regularly scheduled IT Sufi!

Cheers

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

ty

I do realize that ego plays a role. I have demons to tame but so does everyone else so I'm not beating myself up over it lol

So this is some WILD stuff right here. Hot off the presses from George M Nasif's Twitter:

twitter.com...

Benenson Strategy Group internal documents for the Hilary campaign in at the very end of October 2016