It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -21-

page: 216
170
<< 213  214  215    217  218  219 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
These Congressional Democrats are making me very angry.

Now they're walking back their "impeachment inquiry" vote that they said they were going to hold on Thursday.

One of the things Pelosi said her vote would do is grant due process rights to the President and his Counsel. Looks like they've realized that's not a very good idea.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...


House Democratic leaders are walking back a planned vote Thursday that would officially endorse impeachment proceedings and say that the resolution would merely address the process of holding public hearings on the matter.

“This is not an impeachment resolution,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told reporters Tuesday morning. “I don’t know what an impeachment resolution is.”


I think they don't have enough votes to pass the resolution. Hoyer is the majority whip, and he would be the first guy to know this.




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex






posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 01:49 PM
link   
triggeralib.com...

Help Don Jr. Trigger a Lib!




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 01:55 PM
link   

“I don’t know what an impeachment resolution is.”

What kind of BS is this?
A senior Congressman making a statement like this has no business taking part in an impeachment.

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

Pelosi is trying to say that some DC federal judge already confirmed their "impeachment inquiry", so they do not need to actually hold a formal vote. Apparently some decision came down late last week that says something to that effect, so Nancy thinks that is sufficient. An entire House vote on actual impeachment be damned....we are now letting random judges decide what is and what isnt impeachment.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:07 PM
link   
D5/Huber Qdrop decode instructions

Q2549


D5 drops 1st – last. Content & dates. Huber drops 1st – last. Content & dates.


D5 drops = 16 / Huber drops = 70
Arranged side x side – 5x5 = 14 rows of 5x5 with a D5 remainder of 1.

5 x 5
x
5 x 5
x
5 x 5

Note Keystone: Key = 41 (4 + 1 = 5) – Stone = 73 (7 + 3 = 10 = 5x5) = 5 x 5 x 5

Due to the remainder, the D5 drops have a 1x shift in each row. Continue placing drops in order as shown. At end there is a surplus of D5 drops that have not been used in the last round.

Remainder of D5 = 10 / 5x5. Use these 10 in order as a Keystone and place at the top of the sort.

First drops in this set = Q2096 Stay the course and trust the plan
2 + 9 + 6 = 17 = Q
and Q1332 Stay the course and trust the plan

Record time stamps and remove “:”. Example: 11:14:10 = 111410

Verification: Q2096 Time Stamp: 5 Sept 2018 = 5 + 9 + 2 + 1 + 8 = 25

Q25 We Don't Say His Name “Proof to begin 11.3.”

Last set: …...25016. 43345. 41704. 32113.

This does not match though: “11.3” - “...113”.

Look to the 9th column, 4th and 5th rows:

65713.
20511.
30738.

Ordering the Time Stamps with 20511 and 30738 in succession we get 20511.30738.

Beginning with 20511, order time stamps in succession moving down – right – up

Example: 20511.30738.62758.102224.22257.75404.
13633.41704.32113.50515.95926....

Continue to top of last row and begin at first row-top moving down. Continue until all time stamps have been added finishing at 65713.

The theory here is that we are looking for an IP address. Is there a Qdrop that points to further decoding with this in mind?

Look back at the first two: Q2096 and Q1332



United We Stand (WW) WWG1WGA


As Q has stated many times over “You have more than you know”

WWG1WGA has been in front of us the whole time!

WWG1WGA = WWW G1GA WWW = World Wide Web – WW World Wide - “As the world turns”.

WWW G1GA = 23 23 23 7 1 7 1 – 23 23 23 17 17 Pain - Q

Take WWG1WGA and convert to numeral =

23 – 23 – 7 – 1 – 23 - 7 – 1 = 5 – 5 – 7 – 1 – 5 – 7 – 1

Convert spacing of time stamps to

5 – 5 – 7 – 1 – 5 – 7 – 1

Result:

20511.30738.6275810.2.22422.2577540.4.
13633.41704.3211350.5.15959.2623356.8.
42556.29501.0503975.6.21840.1911531.5.
11112.81142.4510360.2.93641.3431533.3.
59743.20121.7513431.5.11001.5111410.9.
01071.05845.9122994.2.42404.4982937.8.
46591.11848.4044994.2.42912.2910584.5.
90107.10243.3110015.3.43151.2175193.6.
08743.20642.3333359.1.11848.8293791.2.
29404.49829.3784659.1.11848.3335964.2.
33743.20936.0812175.1.34315.1100151.1.
14109.01071.0584511.0.01534.3151217.5.
19360.87432.0642333.3.35911.1848846.5.
98293.74044.9942429.1.22910.5845111.4.
10121.75111.0015111.4.10901.0710584.5.
91229.94242.4044982.9.37846.5911184.8.
33359.64233.7432093.6.08814.1910073.2.
25223.90107.6461112.2.71610.3626100.3.
26851.38845.2744912.1.23041.9594971.8.
08642.33846.5984509.1.05421.1050565.1.
93310.28111.1530510.2.95962.7591116.3.
86470.71158.4685154.1.12722.2501643.3.
45123.12812.4812356.2.01016.1933217.5.
47051.11857.6275694.4.26959.1811313.9.
92811.10482.4942429.0.10743.9079385.9.
11371.61129.3212540.6.65713.

Add each set: 20511. = 9. 30738. = 21. 6275810. = 29.

Result:

9.21.29.2.12.30.4
16.16.15.5.29.27.8
22.16.15.5.29.27.8
6.16.19.2.23.22.3
28.6.24.5.3.13.9
9.22.36.2.14.42.8
25.22.34.2.18.29.5
17.10.11.3.14.28.6
22.14.29.1.22.39.2
19.32.42.1.22.33.2
20.20.24.1.16.9.1
15.9.24.0.13.20.5
19.24.21.3.19.39.5
31.19.39.1.14.25.4
5.15.9.4.11.25.5
23.21.31.9.28.29.8
23.18.28.6.21.21.2
14.17.21.2.15.18.3
22.28.29.1.10.44.8
20.24.40.1.12.22.1
16.13.15.2.31.30.3
25.22.33.1.14.21.3
15.14.29.2.8.26.5
21.22.39.4.31.18.9
21.15.34.0.15.41.9
13.19.17.6.22

This gives 26 rows = 8

Note: the first three numbers in the first row – 9 16 22 = I P V = IPv internet protocol!

Continuing in this manner, as demonstrated in previous decoding methods, order sets of numbers starting at the top of row 1 and moving down then back up at bottom of row 2.

Example: 9.16.22.6. - Divide by sets of four to maintain an IPv series.

Revert each new series by one shift, just like the order

Example: 9.16.22.6 - 16.22.6.28 - 22.6.28.9 …..

This produces an extremely large bank of IP addresses!

I have included the first few examples as to include all would push this tutorial back by another week or so and would take up valuable space in the forum.

Note: It seems to work no matter which way you run the numbers. Starting first row-top moving down then back up from second row-bottom, or starting back at second-row top moving down, or starting at the last row-bottom and moving up, or moving from left to right or right to left. Just play around and have fun.

9.16.22.6. IBM-1
16.22.6.28. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
22.6.28.9. DoD Network Information Center
6.28.9.25. Headquarters, USAISC (HEADQU-3) – US Army Intelligence and Security Command
28.9.25.17. DoD Network Information Center (DNIC)
9.25.17.22. IBM-1
25.17.22.19. ISS Design Directorate, Joint Forces Command, UK Ministry of Defence
17.22.19.20. APPLEC-1-Z
22.19.20.15. DoD Network Information Center (DNIC)
19.20.15.19. Ford Motor Company
20.15.19.31. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
15.19.31.5. Hewlett-Packard Company

And many, many, many more!


edit on 29-10-2019 by SilentWindofDoom because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Yesterday we talked about the most obvious thing in the Ukraine impeachment fraud. The transcript can be seen by anyone and anywhere: Here



DJT Tweets Agrees.



Maybe Trump is implying the "wiretapping" never stopped. "I knew people were listening in" can mean the obvious, but double meanings, right?



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
These Congressional Democrats are making me very angry.

Now they're walking back their "impeachment inquiry" vote that they said they were going to hold on Thursday.

One of the things Pelosi said her vote would do is grant due process rights to the President and his Counsel. Looks like they've realized that's not a very good idea.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...


House Democratic leaders are walking back a planned vote Thursday that would officially endorse impeachment proceedings and say that the resolution would merely address the process of holding public hearings on the matter.

“This is not an impeachment resolution,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told reporters Tuesday morning. “I don’t know what an impeachment resolution is.”


I think they don't have enough votes to pass the resolution. Hoyer is the majority whip, and he would be the first guy to know this.


I was under the impression that it wasn't a vote on the impeachment inquiry, but rather a vote on Pelosi going ahead with it or something?



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: imthegoat

The way it read to me was that they were holding a vote to make clear what the impeachment proceedings were. But then there was that part about the vote establish due process to the president and his counsel. That's the part I think they want no part of.

They cannot allow the Republicans a chance to call witnesses. Or defend themselves at all really. Because it's game over if they do. Surely they know that.

They are playing some game here and I'm not sure what it is. I guess they're just trying to continue as they have been. The illusion of impeachment while being able to question in secret and leak selectively.

Ultimately I think they're hoping they can frame Trump up on something that will gain wide support from Republicans and the public alike. They'd need some sort of disaster they can pin on Trump, IMO.

Eh, either way, they are COWARDS. Just do it, Nancy! Hold a vote. Coward.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: imthegoat

The way it read to me was that they were holding a vote to make clear what the impeachment proceedings were. But then there was that part about the vote establish due process to the president and his counsel. That's the part I think they want no part of.

They cannot allow the Republicans a chance to call witnesses. Or defend themselves at all really. Because it's game over if they do. Surely they know that.

They are playing some game here and I'm not sure what it is. I guess they're just trying to continue as they have been. The illusion of impeachment while being able to question in secret and leak selectively.

Ultimately I think they're hoping they can frame Trump up on something that will gain wide support from Republicans and the public alike. They'd need some sort of disaster they can pin on Trump, IMO.

Eh, either way, they are COWARDS. Just do it, Nancy! Hold a vote. Coward.


They might be trying to use scare tactics in hopes someone close to Trump will come forward pre-impeachment so they can have a real whistleblower.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:22 PM
link   
LOL!



gab.com...



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:24 PM
link   
Am I behind?

I'm just now finding out that the guy who listened in on the phone conversation is named Vindman. He emigrated to the U.S. from Ukraine/Soviet Union as a child, went to Harvard (who doesn't...right?), then went into our military, got a Purple Heart for serving in Iraq, then goes to work for intelligence and lands as a staffer in the White House.

Have I got that right?



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:26 PM
link   
a reply to: CanadianMason

help!
my sides!




posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
Am I behind?

I'm just now finding out that the guy who listened in on the phone conversation is named Vindman. He emigrated to the U.S. from Ukraine/Soviet Union as a child, went to Harvard (who doesn't...right?), then went into our military, got a Purple Heart for serving in Iraq, then goes to work for intelligence and lands as a staffer in the White House.

Have I got that right?

While he denies being THE whistleblower.... he is obviously the one that told the whistleblower what he heard in the call.



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: imthegoat

Does anyone else find it slightly odd that the Star witness in todays inquiry, Alexander Vindeman is a Ukranian immigrant who came to the US as a refuge at the age of three.

I know hes a decorated Iraqi War veteran, but dang, does everyone on the left looking into this matter have to have a directt link to Ukraine?

The smell keeps getting stronger...

Vindemins older brother, Leonid Simon Vindeman is a founder and managing partner of Tungsten Capital Advisors.


Prior to founding Tungsten he was a Managing Director responsible for investment banking origination and client coverage activities for Russia and CIS region at UniCredit Group – the largest international bank in Central and Eastern Europe at that time. Previously he worked as a Vice President Investment Banking at JPMorgan Chase, Principal Banker at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the EBRD), Senior Associate at Bankers Trust and Manager at Central Europe Trust.


UniCredit S.p.A.


UniCredit S.p.A. is an Italian global banking and financial services company. Its network spans 50 markets in 17 countries, with more than 8,500 branches and over 147,000 employees.[4] Its strategic position in Western and Eastern Europe gives the group one of the region's highest market shares


And there's Italy again...

Where else was Barr visiting/investigating?

And Just for fun...



I guess Leonid's wife is an art dealer. Yea, art dealer.

Stinky. Anyone care to dig further?



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:37 PM
link   
You think it’s strange that someone w/a Ukrainian background is a National Security Expert on Ukraine? Really? I guess this is news to you.
Vindman is a patriot who swore an oath to our Constitution and meant it, unlike tRump. a reply to: CoramDeo


edit on 29-10-2019 by cfnyaami because: punctuation

edit on 29-10-2019 by cfnyaami because: .



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe


replyCan anyone tell me what has happened to "Innocent until proven guilty" in this country?


It has shifted to " Guilty unless proven Democrat".



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: SilentWindofDoom

Can't say that I understand what the hell you and Rel are doing with your decodes but, freakin' stellar work from the both of you.

Knock.Knock.Knock.

Justice is on the horizon folks!



Acts 26:18



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Right?

Comment was something like, "Expect to get candy on your head if you show up at the Whitehouse in a balloon costume!"

Posted it at 3:22.

Just sayin'......😋




edit on 29-10-2019 by CanadianMason because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2019 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

And with the addition of Unicredit (who's senior leaders are all members of P-2) I think we should really think about that Synarchist/Trotskyist movement I've been bringing up.

This truly is a "One World Dictatorship" that has been revealed. All the little mice involved are trying to eat around their dead friends trying like hell to get what's left of the poisoned cheese. Even now has the mice are chewing their way around the dead, "We the People" are only now becoming aware of what carnage is taking place within our own walls. The smell of these rodents have come to a head.




top topics



 
170
<< 213  214  215    217  218  219 >>

log in

join