It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -21-

page: 142
171
<< 139  140  141    143  144  145 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 08:53 PM
link   






"few in Media" missing "the"



"Even Dems in area are happy!" missing the

2X [the]




posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 08:54 PM
link   
a reply to: cherokeetroy




You're joking, right?



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 08:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

OK... Thank-you. The natives are getting restless, waiting for 8kun.net to come online. What's the real reason why Watkins took 8chan down? Congress didn't demand it. There's something "fishy" with this whole thing...including Q's fixation with Watkins being the only person he/she trusts.


Very strange, indeed. The porn/anti-Sem/white power connection is troubling for me. Always has been.

What is key, I think, is that Trump seems to have distanced himself from the Q movement. Why would he do that?

Just something to think about. I don't have the answer to my own question.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

youtu.be...







posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: CanadianMason

...nope...



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

OK... Thank-you. The natives are getting restless, waiting for 8kun.net to come online. What's the real reason why Watkins took 8chan down? Congress didn't demand it. There's something "fishy" with this whole thing...including Q's fixation with Watkins being the only person he/she trusts.


Very strange, indeed. The porn/anti-Sem/white power connection is troubling for me. Always has been.

What is key, I think, is that Trump seems to have distanced himself from the Q movement. Why would he do that?

Just something to think about. I don't have the answer to my own question.


CT, lemme help here a bit as with distance comes some clarity. It might help to figure out what ACTUALLY came first - the chans or Q? I would contend Q. Then the porn and hate makes sense, no? Discredit what you knew was coming, early and with the worst.

Let's assume everything came in the order presented. A Qscan was taken of all platforms. Which one would likely generate attention, energy and the reQuisite digging and work to verify in only a way deranged autists can/do? Not here, not a round table of educated thinkers, or a youtube channel. They also needed something not owned by a DARPA creation.

So the chans were selected, protocols in place AND, here is the key - seeders. Folks were encouraged, if not directed, to make sure the Q drops got some momentum (whose who claimed they were Q but aren't). My sense is some of Q team also fueled things to start. Meganon was a seeder extraordinaire.

Then the movement made its way out of the chans. The chans started the only local area fire, then Reddit (for a time), Dash/ATS, youtubers, gab, quad even twit regulars lit their torches and took it out of the chans. So we took the chan fire and used it away from the chans, making it palatable, readable, even less scary.

They scanned all this with all forms of information reading. They knew what would create the most energy, the most buzz, the most need to find out. The chan folks are vicious in digging, vetting and concluding. Then we refined, added more esoteric aspects, more conventional connections etc.

The Controllers new this was coming, hate, porn, shilling, chaos, shaming, discouraging is the method to stop. The Chan folks are impervious to it.

As for DJT - he has not distanced, as he posts Q drops every twit. He has obliged the effort to force folks to dig and connect on their own and not hang on a leader.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I'm not sure on any details but yea something smells fishy.




posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: cherokeetroy

Tulsi you say - check this post > www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: liveandlearn

Maybe Pelosi's brother was "taken out" because of her threat to President Trump this week?

It would be interesting if Hillary Clinton's brother died back in early June, after she threatened President Trump.


tried to post earlier but electricity went out.

I would hope that our side doesn't resort to such nefariousness. We would be no better than them.

Not talking about most of us ordinaries. Want our people to keep to the higher ground.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

OK... Thank-you. The natives are getting restless, waiting for 8kun.net to come online. What's the real reason why Watkins took 8chan down? Congress didn't demand it. There's something "fishy" with this whole thing...including Q's fixation with Watkins being the only person he/she trusts.

What is key, I think, is that Trump seems to have distanced himself from the Q movement. Why would he do that?
Just something to think about. I don't have the answer to my own question.


Yep. Not allowing Q tee-shirts, banners, etc, into Trump rallies is definitely real-time "distancing". I still think it's because Q shares sensitive, if not classified, information.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

I don't personally think this to be the case. Note the woman due to take over for Cummings. Hospitalized day before Cummings' death. Pelosi's brother being a former mayor in Baltimore.

I think something is about to break about Baltimore being neck deep in corruption. It's like someone is trying to tie off loose ends there. JMO mind you. But Pelosi's brother was discussed in this thread at length way back. It was always a matter of time for some of these people -- or all of them I guess.

I highly doubt they're offing people to scare politicians. They seem to be doing everything by the book.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

I agree in principal. But those envelopes/notes that were delivered to certain politicians at George Bush Sr.'s funeral were notifications of something serious, IMO. Perhaps the FBI/Intel community are now squarely in President Trump's corner, and are conducting their domestic covert operations on his behalf?



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 09:53 PM
link   
RE: www.redstate.com...

Has it occurred to anyone that even though the DOJ I.G. completed the FISA-abuse report a month ago, it's being held because Barr/Durham's investigation into the origins of the Russia-Trump witch-hunt overlap to some degree?



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:06 PM
link   
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Hmmmm. Pierre Delecto?

Pierre-the french version of Peter

Delecto-To delight in...

What are you saying, Mitt?

I wonder if he ever followed Carlos Danger.

🤔



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:08 PM
link   
Tonight, liberal media is all giddy over this. Saying the Trump Administration is "throwing Rudy under the bus".


The Department of Justice said in a statement that its officials would not have met with Rudy Giuliani about a fraud case had they known his associates were under federal investigation.

The New York Times reported Brian Benczkowski and other DOJ officials met with President Donald Trump’s lawyer several weeks ago to discuss a fraud case. The meeting took place before federal prosecutors arrested and charged Giuliani associates Igor Fruman and Lev Parnas with campaign finance violations.

“When Mr. Benczkowski and fraud section lawyers met with Mr. Giuliani, they were not aware of any investigation of Mr. Giuliani’s associates in the Southern District of New York and would not have met with him had they known,” said DOJ spokesman Peter Carr.

“This is an incredibly unusual statement from the Justice Department, which does not comment on ongoing investigations or even acknowledge them, and it’s the kind of statement that would give clients pause about who is representing them,” former federal prosecutor and MSNBC contributor Joyce Vance told the New York Times.
www.mediaite.com...

Is this part of "a plan"? Maybe the DOJ will still use any evidence Rudy obtained from the Ukraine, and is combing it with what John Durham, along with Ukraine investigators learn?



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I wonder if he ever followed Carlos Danger.

🤔


LOL. Oh man that is quite a leap. 🤣

But, in all the craziness we've seen the past 3 yrs nothing is too far outside the box.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Tonight, liberal media is all giddy over this. Saying the Trump Administration is "throwing Rudy under the bus".

www.mediaite.com...

Is this part of "a plan"? Maybe the DOJ will still use any evidence Rudy obtained from the Ukraine, and is combing it with what John Durham, along with Ukraine investigators learn?


Ugh. They are not "associates" they were clients. Enemedia. Damage done, NPC's think these two are guys Rudy is opening a bagel shop with and he's meeting with them everyday.

Guilt by association.

Someone represented Ted Bundy, was he an "associate" and should that lawyer be executed also?



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
Enter.....


I do not recommend this search string.



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: liveandlearn

I agree in principal. But those envelopes/notes that were delivered to certain politicians at George Bush Sr.'s funeral were notifications of something serious, IMO. Perhaps the FBI/Intel community are now squarely in President Trump's corner, and are conducting their domestic covert operations on his behalf?


Don't remember the specifics but johnheretohelp lasts interview a few days ago implied each envelope was different related to something they were involved with. As i recall all envelopes were given to SS for each person and all envelopes had to be open when given.

link if you haven't listened

Edit: Dang this post must have gone thru fast because it is the second time I have posted to you and my electricity went out immediately. Forutunatly didn't have to repost

edit on 20-10-2019 by liveandlearn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2019 @ 10:44 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




top topics



 
171
<< 139  140  141    143  144  145 >>

log in

join