It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Glyph_D
i would very much like to here your spin on everything titor has spoken. if only for the entertainment
Originally posted by Where2Hide2006
Cool videos Roth! much appreciated!
So whats going on with the movie??? They should make his story into a TV Show, like Jericho but only better. My only hope would be that CBS doens't get its hands on it.
TimeTravel_0 : Yes...in fact the major breakthrough happens at CERN inabout a year.
(Wrong!)
TimeTravel_0 : Im here because of a promise to my grandfather in 1975.
(Which means what? When he went back to 1975, he had to convince this man he was his grandson. Then he came to here and had to convince his parents he was their son. He must have had some INCREDIBLE evidence. Why didn't he show us this evidence!?)
(in fact, "time" is a human invention)
TimeTravel_0 : By definition, this world line is not the same as mine.
(Exactly!)
G° : you with the infinate worlds with infinate possibilities theory then?
TimeTravel_0 : Yes!!!
(see glyph )
TimeTravel_0 : I enjoy the "paranormal" chat rooms for 2 reasons.
TimeTravel_0 : 1. I find the people here are more open to ideas.
TimeTravel_0 : 2. I find it ironic that when what they are looking forfalls in their lap, they can't believe it.
(These couple of lines are huge)
TimeTravel_0 : In 1967, a physist named Tipler came up with the basic equations for time travel based on massive rotating cylinders...ever heard of him?
(he's talking about Frank Tipler and I guess he's talking about this Tipler_Cylinder)
TimeTravel_0 : If you encounter a black hole that is spinning and has an electrified field, you will not be killed passing through its massive gravitational fiuelds.
(and how exactly did they test this? lol. "You go first" "No you go" "No you go" Anyway, I'd really like to see ANY evidence supporting this or an explanation on how. Definately more on black holes later)
TimeTravel_0 : Which will evaporate very quickly.
(which is good if you want the earth to survive, lol)
TimeTravel_0 : It was later discovered that the machines were ending up
about 15 miles away and 3000 fett in the air.
TimeTravel_0 : feet
(And a fall from that height would certainly destroy the car. Meaning in a world with little resources and trying to rebuild they wasted a TON of money)
TimeTravel_0 : A system had to be invented that would "hold" the machine
to
the Earth.
TimeTravel_0 : Its called VGL.
TimeTravel_0 : Its based on very sensative clocks and gravity sensors.
TimeTravel_0 : It stops the time distortion machine if radical changes in
gravity are detected.
(makes no sense. definitely have to revisit this later)
(using 2000 internet jargon I see. Notice he never answers the question)
(what a load. 30 years is not that far in the future. These people hate themselves?)
(bs - 2015 is not that far in the future.)
TimeTravel_0 : Invest in hydrogen fuel cells
(for what? The economy is gone. And no reliable technology around.)
(*yawn* Trying horrible to be dramatic. He's a time traveler right. He can spend as much time as he wants with her. More bs)
Yareisa : hate me personally?
TimeTravel_0 : Sorry.... I don;t hate you.
TimeTravel_0 : I mean this time.
TimeTravel_0 : Jacksonville Fl took a direct hit.
(see Glyph. He brought this up on his own. This is very specific.)
TimeTravel_0 : The radiation killed her.
we're not on his worldline as he stated earlier so it's too late for what?
Originally posted by Glyph_D
what?? hes not wrong. any great device built was built after the schematic was put through the works. the LHC is just the baby of the major breakthrough.
im most certain the "proof" to his grandfather was the trip to 2000, and that would have been the evidence for his parents. tho thats only speculation.
the measured form of time is fictitious, however the passage of change can be observed; "this" is true time. just FYI
"By Definition" as ive stated many times by default its gonna be at least .000...001, which by definition is a different timeline.
i know you think you proved somthing, but you failed:/ i said their are infinite possibilities but "NOT infinite choices" :/
help me here becuase you obviously dont read it like i do:/
well heres the rub with your angle, youve also have to apply this concept to the mechanics of a dual BH, which to me throws this whole point far to the winds:/ its just a known "unknown"
a pure statement of false understanding:/
firstly- they would NOT use any cars in their preliminary tests
and secondly- when on earth has a govt ever been a penny pincher?
what doesnt make sense? the text here appears straight forward to me? :/
why on earth should he? the question is clearly a question that is coming from a skeptical angle "o yeah.. but what about this?". its a stupid question, the answer is yes, but becuase he has a "timemachine" he dont give a sh*t.
what? i live here "now" and i "hate" these people:/
clearly you havent been reading Vitchilo's or Roth's posts. Russia "is" makeing cleaner nukes they are switching to a more "tactical" form as apposed to the mega ton "crack the earth in 2" nukes.
as a combustible fuel, becuase GAS will be gone(un-retrievable to the masses)
WOW . i now revoke my statement about your admiral side, your bleeding heart is no more:/
a sizable change, and before you point out that he states "its possible to change the future" know there is a difference between possibilities and probabilities.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Originally posted by Glyph_D
... the LHC is just the baby of the major breakthrough.
What are you talking about? He was very specific in saying there would be a major breakthrough in a year (he states this several times). It's not 7 years later and the thing isn't even online yet! lol
That doesn't make sense.
He went to 1975 first for his mission. He had to get help from his "grandfather" then meaning he had to convince him then that he was his grandson.
What are you basing this on?
Going by that, that means that basically the same scenario plays out on that worldline....
Meaning what? Meaning there should be MULTIPLE Titor's arriving at the same point at around the same time
The fact that Titor was here 9 months, based on what he says, means this world should be dramatically different from his since every breath he takes would increase the divergence exponentially.
1. How is that possible? If there are infinite possibilities then by definition there are infinite choices.
2. What are you basing this on? I want to see your real science not Titor science.
... if you were planning a hoax, where would you go?
firstly- they would NOT use any cars in their preliminary tests
Then please tell us what they used.
They destroyed the government remember. And the economy would be in shambles at this point with MASSIVE rebuilding and a war dept that'd make anyone cry.
Do you realize how fast the earth is moving? If you stopped the machine every time "radical changes" in gravity are detected, you'd only have gone back a few seconds. And when the machine stops you'd STILL be in the air and miles away.
what? i live here "now" and i "hate" these people:/
Including yourself?
as a combustible fuel, becuase GAS will be gone(un-retrievable to the masses)
B.S.
Titor never states this and why would it?
Also, do you know what it takes to use hydrogen for transportation? A lot more than it does gas.
How many hydrogen refueling stations are there in the U.S.?
How many hydrogen cars are their in the U.S.?
How many do you think would survived the civil war and nuclear war?
lol
Again, we're NOT on his worldline. The probability and possibility of us changing his worldline is nil. But that is irrelevant as we're not on that one.
He doesn't know our future.
Greetings. I am a time traveler from the year 2036. I am on my way home after getting an IBM 5100 computer system from the year 1975.
My "time" machine is a stationary mass, temporal displacement unit manufactured by General Electric. The unit is powered by two, top-spin, dual-positive singularities that produce a standard, off-set Tipler sinusoid.
I will be happy to post pictures of the unit.
Mike Klinge
Hi,
As you are well aware of, I am sure, people can post anything here, whether or not it is true. What proof do you have that you have traveled through time? Rest assured that I want to believe you, but why should I believe?
Thank you for indulging me
My initial flight was from 2036 to 1975 (61 yrs). I then went from 1975 to 2000 (25 yrs.) Later this year, one of two favorable windows will open and I will return to my 2036 (35 yrs.) I am here now for personal reasons. The web page is not mine. I have been speaking online for about three months and the page is a collection of the various documents and pictures I have sent to other individuals.
Also, I realize there is no way for anyone to believe me with absolute certainty so I hope I'm at least entertaining. You may be interested to know that even in 2036, there are a large number of people who don’t believe in time travel. Are you sure the world is round?
Posted by Kevin Spooner on 01-29-2001 02:45 AM
I visited your web page and it immediately struck me with those "photo's" you claimed to have put there or made available or believe in... mind if I ask something to clear my logical thinking mind...
Why is it, given that laser printers etc can print up to 2,400cpi, (or at least 600cpi) and pictures can be scanned at god only knows what (9,600+cpi) why your text and graphics appear to be 1950's reproduction of a faint typewriter in need of a ribbon replacement (God I havn't used the word 'Ribbon' since.... hmmm.)
And then there's the fact that given the obvious typewriter appearance, the 'text' sure wasn't made in 2036.
Oh... please don't use the "oh - technology went by the board by then." approach cause it won't stick.
Please understand that I have examined time travel and parallel world theories extensively and therefore only seek to clarify these points with you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 01-29-2001 07:47 AM
Please keep in mind the web site is not mine and I apologize for the poor quality of the files. The photo you saw was taken by me with a Polaroid camera manufactured here. The other documents were duplicated by placing a book onto a copy machine at a packaging and shipping store and then scanning and saving them.
As for the printing technology in 2036, you may be surprised at how many people use typewriters however I agree the documents were probably not created that way.
I too am very anxious to hear your thoughts and questions on time travel / gravity displacement and any comments on the Everett Wheeler Graham model.
Posted by John Titor on 01-29-2001 03:48 PM
Although the documents posted were printed from a computer printer, is it really that hard to believe that manual typing is just a bit more common in thirty years? After the war, many things like manual printing machines, bicycles, sailboats and hand tools were valued a great deal. I have noticed more people in California are installing wood burning stoves.
I realize my claims are a bit ridiculous but my intent is not really to be believed. However, if I had an opportunity to talk to a time traveler, I might ask questions like: How exactly does the singularity sensor measure the expansion of the inner event horizon or why does the reality of multiple worlds support the religious dogma that there are no good or bad people just good and bad desicions or what were the political motivations that changed the U.S. Constitution?
Posted by Mike Kolesnik on 01-29-2001 06:38 PM
Ho hum...ANOTHER time travler.
1. What was the final death count in the recent India earthquake?
2. What is the "Ginger" (IT) invention?
3. Who wins the Stanley Cup (Hockey) this year?
*snip*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 01-29-2001 09:10 PM
How do you figure I have easy access? I can appreciate your skepticism but I must admit I’m confused by your choice of questions. I fail to understand why a time traveler would be expected to know the details you ask. Right now, do any of you know the details of the first week in February for 1970? For that matter, could you tell me from memory if it rained in Atlanta last week? Is a sports almanac a required or expected piece of equipment for all “time machines”?
At least you didn’t ask the standard “what stocks should I buy” question. Interesting that no one ever asks which stocks to sell. I’m sure my answers will be quite unsatisfying but you should know I do not want your unshakable faith nor do I think anyone should give it so easily if a “time traveler” were able to answer those questions.
In fact, over this medium, it’s impossible to prove I’m a time traveler, therefore, it’s impossible to believe. Actually, I depend on that a great deal so I don’t have to worry about being picked up by your friendly law enforcement officers. What do you think they would do with two micro-singularities?
So here goes...
(1). I have no idea.
(2). It looks like some sort of motorized scooter. What do you think “IT” is?
(3). I know this one but I think it would be unfair and immoral for anyone to win a bet based on something I’ve told them.
Posted by John Titor on 01-30-2001 06:21 AM
In my experience, when it becomes necessary to convince someone what I do for a living the only way to do that is to be related to them. Everything else is immediately written off as a parlor trick, even if they’re standing in front of a cooling distortion unit and I show them a dollar bill with the year 2029 on it.
In the last few months, I have had numerous extended conversations online and there are quite a few things I’ve said which can easily be checked out but haven’t. I get no pleasure out of being right when it comes to CJD disease, war in the Middle East or suffering people in far away lands. There’s nothing like the look on someone’s face when you tell them 100,000 people will be dead tomorrow.
In my travels, I have discovered that most people really don’t want to know about the future because if its different than what they want it ticks them off. Actually, I don’t blame them.
The means by which I travel in time is very physical. I require a “machine” to do it. It weighs about 500 pounds and gets quite hot. I do not own it and I did not build it. Within limits, I will be happy to discuss how it works and how “future” science thinks time works. No we have not completed string theory yet but (N-10) seems to work pretty well.
As far as the future goes, your worldline is about 2.5% different than mine.
This is a roughly cumulative measurement based on my arrival in 1975. As far as I can tell right now, you are headed toward the same events I would call “my history” in 2036. However, the very nature of time travel states that every worldline is unique and you are very much in control of what you do and how you get there. Heck, the fact that I’m here makes it different from mine.
I have nothing to sell, and there is nothing I want anyone to do. For all other time travelers out there, I have no tests for you and I would enjoy discussing your feelings and experiences after the war. To everyone else, while I’m here, I am very interested in your philosophy, religious outlooks and speculations on technology.
Posted by John Titor on 01-30-2001 02:09 PM
Sometimes I imagine what it would be like to approach the Wright Brothers in 1910, before their first flight, and make the suggestion that in a mere thirty years, man would be on the brink of flying through the air at the speed of sound.
What tools would I be able to show them that would convince them? Would a picture of a jet airplane do it? Would complicated math and physics equations do it? Would it take a ride? Perhaps there will be a way to share the photos again but I don’t expect it would convince anyone. I would only hope they would spark conversation and make the reality of time travel a little more personal.
Although I have no personal experience with non-mechanical time travel, I cannot discount it. Physics has a way of making the impossible a reality.
I’m not here to study anyone. My objective was in 1975 and the reason I’m here now is my family. I find my preconceptions of what I would encounter interesting. Being exposed to a society through its art, music and advertising is one thing and experiencing it is another.
I’m not sure the physics of time travel is really that hard to grasp. Most of the working theory has been around on a large scale since 1970 and the technical breakthroughs are happening on your worldline right now.
Technology is not gone in 2036 nor is it the private domain of “government” leaders. Computer printers just didn’t work very well on 12 volts and many people just got used to doing things the old way. After the war, the main problem was distribution. Can anyone tell me how many companies in the United States still manufacture bicycle tires today? Anyone who still has a bike in 2008 will find out.
Posted by Mike Kolesnik on 01-30-2001 07:58 PM
If I traveled back in time I would absolutely want to know the history of the period and location. Since you have revealed yourself you have obviously been trying to convince people of you credibility. So since you had fore knowledge of your intentions you should have been ABSOLUTELY sure of having easy-to-verify NEAR future history. Showing crappy pictures of dollar bills from the future is child's play.
Anybody with a $500 computer can do that. You sound like one of those religious cult nuts whose story keeps changing.
The "temporal divergence" you mention makes it an easy answer for every probing question. " Well, because of the temporal divergence, the whole world just changed, THAT's why none of my predictions come true.
There is a medical term for people like you.
Look it up!
1. So General Electric makes your TT machine. Well if that's the case then being masters of mass production they should have made millions of them because EVERYONE would want one.
2. If the machine does exist we should be FLOODED with TTer's right now!
3. CJD That story has been know since the late 1940's. No great news there.
4. Middle east problems? That's a no brainer.
You are spitting out the same things Ed Dames did.
None of his predictions came true either...
Yawn...
-----------------
Posted by John Titor on 01-31-2001 06:30 AM
I’m not aware of any predictions I made or perhaps we do not agree on the definition. What anyone chooses to do based on something I might say will not affect me in the least. My goal is not to believed and I submit that your life would not be any better (and perhaps worse) if you did believe me. You placed “tests” before me that I must pass. Why? What do I have to gain by passing them?
The fact is there is nothing I can say or show you or let you drop hydrochloric acid on that will “make” you believe me and I really don’t want that. (BS) It would be nice to discuss your view on religion, politics, physics and the mechanical requirements of time travel but in order to engage in those types of conversations, I must apparently tell you who wins the hockey game next week (here again trying to steer the discussion into more rehearsed areas). I’m just guessing that if were to write out the ten lines for Fermat’s final proof you wouldn’t be very impressed either.
(1) Industrialized mass production does not produce the uncountable tonnage of useless consumer items so gleefully absorbed by your society. I would estimate there are about 10 units like mine (C204) and twenty larger units (C206). The main difference is the sensitivity and number of the main Cesium clocks. I would estimate that some sort of public time travel will be common around 2045.
(2) I’m not aware of any other time traveler’s “here” now. But if they are here, I’m sure they’re pouring over sports history books so they can go back in time another week and start a friendly conversation on the web.
(3) The “Mad Cow” story here is yet to begin but don’t worry, the fruited jellitine deserts are safe.
(4) I’m glad to see it’s so easy for to dismiss the Middle East. Yes, I suppose it is a no brainer but pretty soon it will be a “no arrmer” and a “no legger”.
Ethics is an excellent topic of discussion and I hope we can move past a collective insistence of applying everything to this frame of reference.
Originally posted by Glyph_D
i seriously dont think you get the process for scientific developement. einstien laid down the ground work for the "breakthrough" to develope the atomic bomb before anyone considered useing it as a weapon.
titor never goes into detail(thank god) what takes place with his grandfather. however his mission was to retreive the comp. he wouldnt have to convince anyone about anything to get that.
how on earth you piece it together like that? thats not what that would mean by "going by that".
inaccurate, there are over 6 billion people on this planet all haveing the same degree of influence. there will be a rip becuase of the traveller but its not cataclysmic as you suggest(if titor kept a low profile)
if you have at least one choice for every timeline, yes by numbers youd have infinite choices. however from a perspective of accessibility(options), one person CANNOT exist in multiple timelines. therefore they cannot benefit from the infinite choices, they are restricted to a limited number.
remember dice?if i had infinite dice id have infinite choices, but i dont so i get the shaft.
again you assume hes a hoax, maybe he just wanted to talk on the net, like he claimed:/
*theoretically BH exist right in your front lawn, your bathroom, your food. the stories youve been told about BH are theoretical. i know you dont want titor science, but adding an electrical charge to a field does change its behavior(read: HAARP). does that apply to BH aswell? id assume so(but i dont like to assume)
a cardboard box? sh*t man get a clue. technology starts cheap and basic then they start the upgrades
they "replaced" the govt, the rest is speculation
clearly your definition of radical changes is different than what this device was to detect:/
the war in ME is why petro will be scarce, and/or to expensive for the populace to manage.
fortunately-H cars are not that difficult to develop, and with the knowledge of H extraction from water the possibilities are bright. H is cleaner and easier to use than petroGAS, however its dangerous in foolish hands(which is to me the real reason for its poor backing)
your right he doesnt "know" our future but he does see whats coming becuase its not to different than what was in his timeline.
think of it like this> before titor came we had a 100% chance of getting a civilwar, now that he has came and went that percentage dropped. [according to him the percentage is still to high to advert his future]
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
I understand it perfectly. This doesn't change anything. As I said, Titor was WRONG. 7 years later and it's not even online yet.
There was no breakthrough (and Titor said what they would discover).
If there are multiple worldlines and if the same events happen on those multiple worldlines, then the Titors from those worldlines would all end up back here around the same time.
Titor stated that he visited his younger self. Which would be on this worldline. He's from a different one.
Also we're talking about time travel. Whether going backward or forward there are an infinite number of possibilities of where you will find yourself. Assuming you can control time travel that would mean there are an infinite amount of choices.
Who says you don't? You obviously do because no matter where you go you're on a different worldline.
Yes assuming he's a hoax as by far the most logical conclusion Now if you're going to perpetrate a hoax, where would you go?
We're talking about something that holds two BHs which would weigh TONS.
Nonsense. This was never is timeline. Where do you get we had a 100% chance of a civil war????
This worldline could have had a 0% chance before Titor came. There's no way Titor would have or could have known.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Anyway. Roth, was that some sort of preemptive strike?
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
1. Why would you believe anything Pamela or Darby has to say? You think they're sincere? lol Well, maybe Darby. But Pamela.....well, perhaps we'll get into that a little later
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Nice that you posted that interview. We'll get to Larry and Titor's "mom" later (they got sloppy there - yes "they").
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Alright now for Titor's posts....
This is mainly for show for now. I'll comment on a few stuff. But not alot now....
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Not my house. Im just visiting.
G° : tonight? or longer term than that?
TimeTravel_0 : I've been here for about 3 months.
(3 months eh? This was in October. So he's been there since July. This could be important later on )
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Yes...in fact the major breakthrough happens at CERN inabout a year.
(Wrong!)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Yes. High speed proton acceleration.
G° : that about sums an incredibly complex bit of kit in onesentence... but yes
TimeTravel_0 : Ill be happy to go into detail but most people regret it.
(Good tactic here of trying to lead the discussion away from the topic. Why? Probably because his buddies aren't around to answer those types of questions for him)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : The information has been out for quite a while.
(As I've stated before. Nothing Titor is saying is new or couldn't readily be looked up in a quick internet search)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : its a black hole about the size of an electron.
(lol, we'll get to this later I guess. SHP has already posted info on this however so please feel free to look it up now if you want.)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Being from 2036...Im not as ignorant as my colonial countrymen.
(excuse me!? You're from this time period too buddy!)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Im here because of a promise to my grandfather in 1975.
(Which means what? When he went back to 1975, he had to convince this man he was his grandson. Then he came to here and had to convince his parents he was their son. He must have had some INCREDIBLE evidence. Why didn't he show us this evidence!?)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : I appreciate that but I also know Im more entertaining than anything else.
(Giving us a clue here, lol)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : the truly mad wouldn't realise they were ... excentric?
TimeTravel_0 : You are more right than you know.
(...and here)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : A good car for 1975.
TimeTravel_0 : The distortion machine is in a 4 wheel drive now.
G° : how come from then? was it kept in good condition til 2036?
(I've asked this same thing. He doesn't answer him)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : I was sent back to 1975 to get a computer.
TimeTravel_0 : Its an IBM model 5110.
(5110 you say? Funny because the 5110 wasn't even announced until 1978)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : the 5110 is able to read the old IBM mainframe code.
TimeTravel_0 : Its the first protable computer produced by IBM.
TimeTravel_0 : Actually its about the size of a small table.
TimeTravel_0 : We need on in 2036.
(one "5110" will fix all the computers in the world in 2036. Horray! Also, he never really explains what the computer would do. There are multiple ways of dealing with the Y2K38 problem, which are being implemented now. No one's using old computers to solve this problem as that would make absolutely no sense.)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : so have you tried changing the past yet? or have you found that everything you do..
G° : has already been done?
TimeTravel_0 : Hmmm...physics.
TimeTravel_0 : Actually... world lines are not fixed.
TimeTravel_0 : They are all different.
TimeTravel_0 : There is no one "time".
(in fact, "time" is a human invention)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : In fact..I've noticed samll changes.
G° : I mean you upstairs asleep wouldn't have known if you now was
downstairs
G° : you have? thats what i was getting it
TimeTravel_0 : No...he knows me.
TimeTravel_0 : Yes...small changes.
G° : care to give an example?
TimeTravel_0 : Sure...
TimeTravel_0 : Football....(sorry) games that were lost that should have been won.
TimeTravel_0 : Incidental news stories that havent happened.
TimeTravel_0 : Books not written.
TimeTravel_0 : Small stuff like that.
(I don't know about you but I'm a huge -American- football fan and I don't even remember scores from last year! Yet he remembers scores from when he was 2? I don't think so. And what books are you reading at two beside See Spot Run?)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : wow. surely that can't be anything to do with you?
TimeTravel_0 : No.
TimeTravel_0 : By definition, this world line is not the same as mine.
(Exactly!)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : so how come do you think?
TimeTravel_0 : Physics.
TimeTravel_0 : Have you ever been in a room that has mirrors on all the walls?
G° : you with the infinate worlds with infinate possibilities theory then?
TimeTravel_0 : Yes!!!
(see glyph )
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Multipole world theory is correct.
G° : like sliders
TimeTravel_0 : Sliders?
G° : tv show
(I liked that show!)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : before your time... LOL
TimeTravel_0 : Hmmm...havent seent hat one.
G° : hmmm. I must admit, that theory has always bothered me
TimeTravel_0 : Have you heard of Schrodinger's cat?
(en.wikipedia.org...)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : so. what can we do for you tonight TT? How come your here?
TimeTravel_0 : I enjoy the "paranormal" chat rooms for 2 reasons.
TimeTravel_0 : 1. I find the people here are more open to ideas.
TimeTravel_0 : 2. I find it ironic that when what they are looking forfalls in their lap, they can't believe it.
(These couple of lines are huge)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : The singularities distort gravity.
TimeTravel_0 : Ill be happy to go through the physics. The basics are already known.
wyrmkin_37 : please........proceed
Yareisa : please do
TimeTravel_0 : Ok
TimeTravel_0 : In 1967, a physist named Tipler came up with the basic equations for time travel based on massive rotating cylinders...ever heard of him?
(he's talking about Frank Tipler and I guess he's talking about this [ur]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipler_Cylinder[/url])
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
wyrmkin_37 : gravitation
TimeTravel_0 : The effect is magnified greatly in a black hole.
TimeTravel_0 : As it turns out...
TimeTravel_0 : If you encounter a black hole that is spinning and has an electrified field, you will not be killed passing through its massive gravitational fiuelds.
(and how exactly did they test this? lol. "You go first" "No you go" "No you go" Anyway, I'd really like to see ANY evidence supporting this or an explanation on how. Definately more on black holes later)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : is this the omeg point theory?
G° : omega?
TimeTravel_0 : CERN will discover some very odd things as a result oftheir high energy experiments.
(like what!?)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : They will accidently create microsingularities.
G° : makes things go round and hit each other...
TimeTravel_0 : Which will evaporate very quickly.
(which is good if you want the earth to survive, lol)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : If you bombard a singularity with electrons...
TimeTravel_0 : you can alter the size of its event horizon.
TimeTravel_0 : and thus its gravitational field.
TimeTravel_0 : By overlapping these fileds from two singularities...
TimeTravel_0 : you can travel forward and backward through time.
(HOW)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
G° : didn't tipler say there was no event horizon?
TimeTravel_0 : No..he said it was possible to approach a massive gravitationl field from certain angles and not get squished.
G° : oh, sorry
wyrmkin_37 : lol
TimeTravel_0 : Actually...Im not really a physisit.
G° : but you know all about this stuff... is that why you were picked?
(Titor's statement and the above question - important later)
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
TimeTravel_0 : Hmmm....you drive a car and know how to change the oildon;t you?
TimeTravel_0 : I am based in Tampa Fl.
G° : actually, only just.. LOL
wyrmkin_37 : chas, afb
TimeTravel_0 : McDill
(also may be important)
Posted by Vanessa Bunn on 01-31-2001 03:41 PM
John Titor,
A serious reply please. When you determine the time to which you want to travel do you "dial in" the date to which you want to go, can you "jump" to a new date, say in 1000 year increments. Can you "sample" the time period by stopping only for a few moments before continueing your trip and can you take passengers with you????? please answer honestly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 01-31-2001 07:13 PM
The distortion unit reaches its target destination by using very sensitive gravity sensors and atomic clocks. The basic unit of calculation is the second. So yes, in a sense you do “dial in” in a date and the computer system controls the distortion field. At maximum power, the unit I have is capable of traveling about 10 years an hour.
Unfortunately, time travel is not an exact science. There is inherent error and chaos in the computers ability to make accurate calculations. Based on the current technology of the clocks and sensors, distortion units are only accurate to about 60 years or so. So no, in 2036, we are unable to travel back 1000 years due to the error rate in the system. The divergence between the worldline of origin and the target worldline would be too great. If one were to try and travel back that far, history would look nothing like what you would expect.
The unit has mass limits but the 204 is capable of transporting about three people and equipment. I don’t think you would like 2036 very much.
Posted by Charles Moltrup on 01-31-2001 09:02 PM
Why would you want a IBM 5100 I can find them at auctions for next to nothing, i think they were the first 286 CPU's.
Why didn't you stop in this year first and by one.Well I have a good question for you in 2036 do you still use toliet paper to wipe your ass.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 02-01-2001 08:36 AM
The 5100 had a very simple and unique feature that IBM did not account for and decided it was not in their best interest to advertise (which in hindsight was not very smart). This accidental feature was thus removed from any future desktop computers. In order to take advantage of this feature, the 5100 I have now required a couple of special “tweaks” that had to be done by one of the software engineers in 1975. Anyone who is familiar with this feature and was told to keep their mouth shut about it will be able to tell you what it is.
Yes we still have toilet tissue and some people still suffer from extreme anal fixation.
I have noticed and gotten used to the act of verbal conflict as a cathartic entertainment. I don’t totally understand it but I take no offense by it either. Perhaps we could just arm wrestle some day and still be able to have a pleasant conversation.
Posted by Kevin Spooner on 02-01-2001 04:58 AM
I'm pleased to see certain persons take little offence and in fact upon re-reading my posts recently I have noticed they don't read as intended - I am for the record pleasant but usually quiet company! Sorry if I upset you (I hope not.)Dear God... please hurry up and make these computers write not what is typed... but what is meant.... hmm.
I have a natural inquisitive mind and enjoy and technical challenges. I am also a Spiritualist and to that end enjoy both spirit and mind... which is why I for one am naturally curious about the future, time travel, parallel universes, and spiritual matters. I believe that most people visiting this site do so for a mixture of reasons - including the DESIRE to know.
You mentioned previously the year 2008 - what's significant given your observed 2.5% difference between this time line and your own?
You mentioned a certain model (204) travel unit - what is the source of power and what type of 'engine' is used?
If as you claimed, most of the requisite information has been around since 1970's - and yet time travel is not public until ? 2045... why is it that a time traveller can not divulge design information that would demonstrate its reality. Are there missing common elements/materials yet to be discovered or engineered?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 02-01-2001 08:36 AM
The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over. The civil war in the United States will start in 2004. I would describe it as having a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse. The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and end in 2015 with a very short WWIII.
The source of power for the C204 that allows it to distort and manipulate gravity comes from two microsingularities that were created, captured and cleaned at a much larger and “circular” facility. The dual event horizons of each one and their mass is manipulated by injecting electrons onto the surface of their respective ergospheres. The electricity comes from batteries. The breakthrough that will allow for this technology will occur within a year or so when CERN brings their larger facility online.
Perhaps it would have been clearer to state that the math has been around since 1970. I would urge you to examine the properties of Kerr black holes and Tipler cylinders. An actual working prototype was first tested in 2034. On my worldline, time travel is not a public recreation but we are all aware that it exists. You may be disappointed to know that the ability to manipulate gravity is not the technical challenge that had to be overcome. Miniaturizing the clocks and sensors, creating clever ways to vent x-rays and creating a computer system dependable enough to calculate the changes required to the field were the main challenges. There are no missing pieces…just missing energy levels and a few very interesting subatomic particles.
Posted by Mel Reckling on 02-01-2001 10:42 AM
JOHN,
I always thought a good question to ask a time traveler
would be: When is the next triple crown won in horse racing and what is that horse's name. Those events are few and far between and generally remembered. They should stand out in most people's minds. This could be a good little test. A winner of some obscure 10k race in Utah nobody would remember, but Derby winners and especially Triple Crown winners hold international prominence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 02-01-2001 11:28 AM
Unfortunatly, winners of historical sports betting events are not high on the priority list of people in 2036. As a thought experiemnt, If I did tell you who the winning horse was and you killed it before the final race, would that make me a liar or would it support my statement that our worldlines are about 2% different? Do you know who won that race 30 years ago?
Posted by Matt Hagemeier on 02-01-2001 11:55 AM
John. a fee questions: what is the political climate like in the U.S in your current timeline? I mean, what form of government is there?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Charles Moltrup on 02-01-2001 12:04 PM
Sorry about the flip question you do know your computers but still why didn't you buy a CRAY computer second hand they are much more reliable.Have a nice flight BACK TO THE FUTURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Grant Nelson on 02-01-2001 07:21 PM
John, you are right about the significance of the 5100 so I tend to believe most of what you say about the near future will also come to pass in my personal time line.
I propose a little experiment.
I will come look you up if I happen to be in Florida in 2036 and we can talk computers or go fishing.
PS Next time somebody asks which team won a particular game just tell 'em it was the one that scored the most points.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 02-02-2001 06:34 AM
If you could change one thing about your government right now, what would it be?
The United States is still a representative republic in 2036 but it was touch and go for a while. After the war, the U.S. had divided into 5 general areas based on their economic and defensive strengths. Many people blamed the government organization for the war and the last Constitutional Congress was held in 2020 to officially scrap the Constitution and start over. Fortunately, this exercise in anger pointed out how hard it was to come up with anything better. It was decided the document wasn’t at fault. As a result, there have been a few small changes to the Constitution and the executive branch but you would easily recognize it. The average citizen is more educated about the Constitution and aware of the rights and responsibilities it gives them. Federal power has been decentralized and the focus of daily politics is in the state senates. Federal law has also been streamlined but much harder to change or make additions to.
The people who sign my paycheck told me why we needed a 5100 and sent me off to get one. I was not in a position to make alternate suggestions. As I recall, isn’t the Cray a rather large system? We need something portable. The 5100 isn’t required for its reliability, its needed to translate between APL, UNIX and a few obscure IBM mainframe languages.
The fishing is great and you’re more than welcome to join us but the “me” here is only three. I’ll have to tell him your coming.
Posted by James R.Quayle III on 02-02-2001 06:49 AM
Greetings TT Titor,I have not been on this site in a long while,I am acquantinces with Al Bielek,and I have been in close quarters with beings not human and not from this place or time.The Humans who talk with you on this post have not asked you yet how you feel about your travels?How has it effected you emotionally,Do you age ?Does the hair grow on your face faster,do your nails grow quicker,Does the air taste different in different time periods?How is the food in the future,Have you tried to eat things not found in your time?Do you know me in the future?I plan on living 120 years,so i am sure going to look for you later 35 years from now i will be 66,I was born in 1970.I have met a few other TT people(TimeTravel),I did not ask them about lotteries or sh1t like that(How petty)I like my time,but i see Traveling into Another Time and Space as too much for most humans,to think on different levels,to not lose oneself,to not fall in love or like with peoples from different times.That must be the hardest,to not be able to connect with others that would be traumatized by the info given by a TT person.Wether your from here nor there matters not, thanks for helping the ones from this Time think of what they are and where they may be heading.Agentq3 Blessed Be in your travels!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by John Titor on 02-02-2001 10:09 AM
Yes, I age and my hair and nails grow at normal rates. Please keep in mind that gravity distortion does involve some dilation effects but “jumping” between worldlines are timelike trips, not spacelike trips. The air is about the same although I do smell and taste industrial odors here my parents cannot. The food in the future is grown and raised naturally inside the community structure. This is done primarily for safety reasons. I am amazed at the risks people here are willing to take with processed food. All of the food I eat here is grown and prepared by myself or my family. Unfortunately, I do not know if we are acquainted on my worldline. Yes, love is a challenge. What’s harder is knowing you could go back and correct a mistake but at the cost of the “you” on that worldline you want to live your life over again on.