It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: Guyfriday
I've been to an after math of a Sasquatch hunt that was conducted.
And what was the aftermath? Did the hunters see or shoot anything not recognized by science?
Given that much of the analysis and discussion concerns genetics, and given that I'm not a geneticist, my general feeling is that any decision about the fate of this ms must fall 'into the lap' of geneticist reviewers. Based on more general issues discussed here, I conclude that the work currently suffers from some areas of obfuscation that prevent me from understanding exactly what it is the authors are proposing.
This is clearly important information that I hope the public will have access to soon. However, I was immediately taken by surprise after thoroughly reading the manuscript to see such a high reference to Hominins, including the title. I was surprised because there is no substantial evidence presented by the author that the species identified in the 3 whole genomes is a biped. Eye witness accounts are the only data presented to determine or substantiate a biped of any kind.
originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: PAUL35791
WHy are you even here?? Every OP you start and I mean EVERY OP is a waste of internet space.
You provide NO EVIDENCE to any of the ludicrous statements you make, apart from links to terrible, ill-educated YouTubers who are all nut jobs.
At least document your so called facts with scientific, empirical evidence. Something, *anything* from a reputable science journal. Not horsesh*t YouTube videos, not your opinions. ANything substantial
originally posted by: PAUL35791
This coming from someone with no Science qualifications...