It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Shut up about impeachment and get your heads out of your rear.

page: 7
78
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Good to see that reasonable discussion is not completely drowned out here.






posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:12 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

It's like trying to argue Jesus Christ is not the only path to salvation with a born-again Biblicist.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



not only a liar, he is a bad one. His antics on the house floor are at best deplorable and at worst treasonous.
a reply to: Helious


You are speaking about the President right? Maybe you got something mixed up


I know it’s hard for you but try to keep up.
He is talking about the treasonous liar Schiff, one of the leaders of the Dem cult that has you permanently brainwashed.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:12 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL ... accept the challenge?

There is no challenge. You questioned the validity of impeachment, and I answered you.

Do you need me to cite the Constitution itself to you?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

LOL ... you haven't even made a proposition for debate.

And I've already finished with your buddy.


So you have turned down DB?

Awesome!!!!

I formally challenge you to a debate on the validity of the impeachment of President Donald J Trump.

It'll be tomorrow because I have to sleep and don't know anything about the debate forum at all.

7pm tomorrow Central time be OK with you?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: toysforadults
you would think after 3 years of the same threads you would get bored of this bs and pay attention to the US Navy publicly confirming UFO that they have no idea what they are

and a former US Navy CO coming out on the Joe Rogan podcast stating that hes had several meetings with high level pentagon officials on the topic and they don't know what these things are

seems more important to me than this daily dribble that low IQ people seem to be focused on


I just have to ask...

Who holds you down and makes you respond in these threads then?

Aliens maybe?



these threads are low IQ; I just come here in to remind you of that



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gothmog

Facts?

We're waiting.

Just as good as some folks holding on to the Mueller report



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: toysforadults
you would think after 3 years of the same threads you would get bored of this bs and pay attention to the US Navy publicly confirming UFO that they have no idea what they are

and a former US Navy CO coming out on the Joe Rogan podcast stating that hes had several meetings with high level pentagon officials on the topic and they don't know what these things are

seems more important to me than this daily dribble that low IQ people seem to be focused on


I just have to ask...

Who holds you down and makes you respond in these threads then?

Aliens maybe?



these threads are low IQ; I just come here in to remind you of that


Quoted for irony.




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL ... accept the challenge?

There is no challenge. You questioned the validity of impeachment, and I answered you.

Do you need me to cite the Constitution itself to you?


So you are wussing out now?

Let me know and I won't contact the Mod.

TOPIC

Should Trump be impeached?

Last chance!

I keep trying and you keep avoiding.

One-on-one.

Mano-y-mano.

Winner takes all debate on the impeachment of Trump.

You got the stones to accept the challenge of a little ree-ree like me?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66


He is talking about the treasonous liar Schiff


How is he treasonous?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Gothmog

Yeah. I pull the report out when people try to tell me that Mueller exonerated Trump of wrong doing and declared him innocent of collusion and obstruction.

Don't forget, it didn't.

I already counted you...



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Good grief.

I answered DB above. There's nothing to debate formally. A formal debate has to be framed in terms that can be proven with evidence, and I have proven that the impeachment investigation is valid which was DB and apparently your parroted proposition. Care to attempt to rephrase?

*tap tap* Is this mic working???



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:17 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL ... "wussing out" .... you can't even keep your proposition straight.

First it was "the validity of impeachment"

Now it's "Should he be impeached?"

And I've already answered you. Twice.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL ... "wussing out" .... you can't even keep your proposition straight.

First it was "the validity of impeachment"

Now it's "Should he be impeached?"

And I've already answered you. Twice.


So yes or no?

Do you think the impeachment reaches the level of High Crimes and Misdemeanors?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Good grief.

I answered DB above. There's nothing to debate formally. A formal debate has to be framed in terms that can be proven with evidence, and I have proven that the impeachment investigation is valid which was DB and apparently your parroted proposition. Care to attempt to rephrase?

*tap tap* Is this mic working???


I really don't have to...

You're saying you don't have the balls to debate the topic.

So at least we know where you stand.

Although now I need to read up on the Debate forum... seems right up my alley.

Thanks for chickening out and piquing my interest on that side of ATS!




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:21 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




Do you think the impeachment reaches the level of High Crimes and Misdemeanors?


What do the "impeachments" say?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: Helious

This whole fiasco from start to finish is full of half truths, embellishments and non demonstrable "evidence". This is easily proven and already has been on multiple fronts, multiple times.



It's pretty obvious Trump broke the law even if you refuse to accept it.

Trump broke election laws with the Ukraine and just did it again few days ago saying exactly the same stuff but with China. I am kind of getting tired of people putting their party before the Constitution and rule of law. We have election laws for a reason. Trump is NOT above the law contrary to what the Fox news and OAN propaganda is telling you.

"Today, Common Cause filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging that President Donald Trump, his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, and other political operatives illegally solicited a political contribution from a foreign national—by urging Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other Ukrainian officials to investigate Hunter Biden and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden. The allegations were first published in The Wall Street Journal, and subsequently President Trump admitted that during a July 25th phone call he pressured President Zelensky to pursue the investigation of his political rival and his son.

Federal law prohibits a foreign national from directly or indirectly making a “contribution or donation of money or other thing of value” in connection with a U.S. election. Federal law also prohibits a person from soliciting or providing substantial assistance in the solicitation of such a contribution from a foreign national. Federal law defines “contribution” to include “any gift … of money or anything of value made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal office.” And the FEC by regulation defines “solicit” to mean “to ask, request, or recommend, explicitly or implicitly, that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value.”"

www.commoncause.org... bution-from-ukrainian-president/



Did Obama commite a crime when he gave support to derail the election of BB? Money and people? Or is it just the right who are guilty?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL ... "wussing out" .... you can't even keep your proposition straight.

First it was "the validity of impeachment"

Now it's "Should he be impeached?"

And I've already answered you. Twice.


So yes or no?

Do you think the impeachment reaches the level of High Crimes and Misdemeanors?


And now a third rephrasing ...

DB, at least this latest is a question with an answer, as it is a request for an opinion although a badly phrased one.

So far, Mr. Trump has stated in public, and the White House has provided a transcript, in which it is clear that Trump asked a foreign power to meddle in our elections again. In my opinion, that is not a valid use of Presidential power or the bully pulpit.

Impeachable in my opinion? Clinton was impeached for lying about a blowie. Johnson was impeached for being illiterate.

A President can be impeached if a majority of the House votes in favor of Articles of Impeachment. Period.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: RazorV66


He is talking about the treasonous liar Schiff


How is he treasonous?


Fabricating evidence with the goal of removing a duly elected president.
The entire transcript of the phone call is out, there is no evidence of anything in the transcript.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

LOL ... you don't speak for "we" sweetie.

And as far as chickening out ... have YOU come up with a proposition to debate yet?



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join