It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Shut up about impeachment and get your heads out of your rear.

page: 5
78
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:39 PM
link   
We should put one leftist and one normal thinking person in the Debate Thread and have an honest debate about this issue just using facts, I think it'll be fun!




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
you guys pay way to much attention to this circus

the circus basically controls every thought you have, what a disgrace; you should be embarrassed by how easily mind controlled you are



So why come into the thread then?

You must be the ringleader.
🤡



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:41 PM
link   
LOL @ "normal thinking person"



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

I think you know your comments are riddled with falacious reasoning.

Quid pro quo on the basis of good for the country? That seems reasonable.

Using the power of the Office to entice another foreign power to meddle in our Electoral process?

Unacceptable to any real American.



I think you know that this whole fiasco is another witch hunt put up now to get ahead of various investigations coming to an end which is going to sink some of your political idols and make you look stupid.

But you keep spinning it and I'll keep laughing...

Our Top Cop asking another country to investigate corruption from our own country BAD!!!

Except when your party did it three years ago.

THAT was perfectly acceptable because Orange Man Bad.

Biden bragging about committing obstruction of justice on video... perfectly OK and don't pick on him or we'll investigate you!!!

This is actually clown world now.

Hint... you are one of the ones in the ring sweety.

We're just watching from the front row right now.




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL @ "normal thinking person"




Care to accept the challenge?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL @ "normal thinking person"




Care to accept the challenge?


Be nice... he's obviously already challenged.

Let him live so we can laugh at him!!!!




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Can't oblige you there bud. I'm not "a leftist."

Conversely, I haven't seen a single "normal thinking person" in this thread using facts in support of Trump.

So, what's to debate? You made a political slur and got called on it.

Why don't you break down the proposition? Perhaps an actual leftist would take you up on it, IF you find a normal thinking Trump supporter. All I see here are zealots.
edit on 6-10-2019 by Gryphon66 because: Punctuation



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
We should put one leftist and one normal thinking person in the Debate Thread and have an honest debate about this issue just using facts, I think it'll be fun!




Define " normal ".



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: HalWesten




There was ZERO evidence of collusion!


False. Mueller found numerous instances of collusion, but he also generously opined that the Trump team, Don Jr, Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort, were too inept to properly coordinate with Russia. But they tried. They knew of Russia's interference and welcomed it, used it and coordinated their talking points with WikiLeaks releases.

Also, Mueller cited no less than 10 instances of "obstruction of justice", which Bill Barr said were understandable antics and outbursts, given how Trump was so righteously upset about being unfairly accused.




So , you are one of the 5 people in the world still hanging on to the Mueller report ?
As in the movie Frozen:
"Let it go"



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Har. Har.

So, anyone who doesn't share your particular view of the world is challenged?

There must be an awful lot of challenged folks, in your estimation.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Got any of those "normal thinking person" facts for that absurd claim Goth?



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TomLawless
Here's my two cents worth. They remove Trump and VP, Sanfran Nancy become president, deep state takes her out blames crazy Trump supporter, elections are suspended deep state takes control of country. Is this so far fetched? I dont think so since the deepstate has been removing duly elected officials since the end of WW2.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DBCowboy

Can't oblige you there bud. I'm not "a leftist.:

Conversely, I haven't seen a single "normal thinking person" in this thread using facts in support of Trump.

So, what's to debate? You made a political slur and got called on it.

Why don't you break down the proposition? Perhaps an actual leftist would take you up on it, IF you find a normal thinking Trump supporter. All I see here are zealots.



I officially challenge you to a debate in the Debate Forum on the veracity of the allegations towards the impeachment of President Donald J Trump.


edit on 6-10-2019 by DBCowboy because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: JON666

Can you name the only President that has joked about suspending elections and taking additional terms in recent history?
edit on 6-10-2019 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:51 PM
link   
So in the back of mind I've been trying to discover why the rush, with fabricated inference for tthis impeachment inquiry. My Conjecture is that T man has all along intended to investigate the Fed Reserve, the main power supply of the Deep State and NWO, intended to do so after his second term was assured. If this has been sniffed out by the deep state, T is in personal peril if this impeachment falls flat.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Har. Har.

So, anyone who doesn't share your particular view of the world is challenged?

There must be an awful lot of challenged folks, in your estimation.


You just pussied out of a debate and want to take a hit at me?

I've never even been to the Debate forum before and know nothing about it... care to jump in with me?

ETA... seems DB has formally challenged you.

I'd love to watch to see how it works!


edit on 6-10-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

LOL ... you avoided the question and mistated the facts.

I don't qualify as a leftist, and I haven't seen any normal thinking Trump supporters ... so there's no possible Debate to pussy out of, sweets.

Hmmm. Debate you? Do you have a valid proposition? Make it and we'll see.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: JON666

Can you name the only President that has joked about suspending elections and taking additional terms in recent history?


The optimal word there is joked, he just pulling the lefts chain and they are going full TDS. Can you name a senator that solicited help to derail an duly elected president from Russia??
edit on 6-10-2019 by JON666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zrtst
So in the back of mind I've been trying to discover why the rush, with fabricated inference for tthis impeachment inquiry. My Conjecture is that T man has all along intended to investigate the Fed Reserve, the main power supply of the Deep State and NWO, intended to do so after his second term was assured. If this has been sniffed out by the deep state, T is in personal peril if this impeachment falls flat.


Fabricated evidence? That Trump has used the Presidency to entice foreign nations to interfere in our elections again?

LOL. See above regarding normal thinking.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

LOL ... you avoided the question and mistated the facts.

I don't qualify as a leftist, and I haven't seen any normal thinking Trump supporters ... so there's no possible Debate to pussy out of, sweets.

Hmmm. Debate you? Do you have a valid proposition? Make it and we'll see.


DB just officially called you.

I'd like to watch and see how it works.

He has fighter in his tag so he's been there before.

But if you can't debate with him and still want to take me on, that's fine.



ETA...


So, anyone who doesn't share your particular view of the world is challenged?


Not at all... I'm a fiscal conservative, social liberal so my particular viewpoints are not part of the political "norm".

I think people who just swallow one side of a political argument hook, line and sinker without balancing it with facts are, by definition, challenged.

Hope that helped.


edit on 6-10-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join