It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump is Sending Nancy Pelosi a Demand Letter for a Full Vote

page: 10
51
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: fredrodgers1960
If there is an official impeachment vote, then both parties have the subpoena powers. The Dems simply can't allow that to happen.

Once they do, Pandora's box opens up. Because the republican attorneys already have their subpoena's typed up and ready.

Bringing this up for a vote would be a catastrophic mistake for the dems.

Fred..


Fred, you are so right!


Silly, it would behoove you to think about what Fred posted. There would possibly be hope for you if you're not Ms Rodham Clinton herself.
edit on 5-10-2019 by Justoneman because: grammar




posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Could someone quote for me the part of the Constitution that gives the President power to command the House Speaker to do anything at all?

Hmmm ... I thought not.



When they convict her for her crimes, it will be very Constitutional. So there IS that for one item.

DING!

DING DING!

edit on 5-10-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

WHAT IF ............Believe it or Not , but President Trump , if Not Assassinated by his Own " People " or Foreign Nationals in the Next Four Years IF Reelected , could " Possibly " Change on his Own , the Geopolitical Map of Planet Earth , and Usher in a Global Peace and Prosperity the Likes that has Never been Seen Since Man Conceived of the Idea of Civilization . Can you Imagine > ? ......Hmm....

edit on 5-10-2019 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 07:56 PM
link   
While we’re at why don’t we investigate Pelosi too!


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi may soon be facing similar allegations to Joe Biden. A recent report suggested Pelosi’s son Paul may have used her position to benefit financially. A promotional video from 2013 resurfaced on Thursday, brought to public attention by journalist Patrick Howley.



Pelosi’s son traveled to Ukraine in 2017 on behalf of the Corporate Governance Initiative, where he now serves as executive director. The official reason given for his visit was to discuss a youth soccer partnership program with the Ukrainian government, but clips of that trip have reportedly been removed from online.




The video shows Nancy Pelosi speaking about her efforts in office to push for clean energy. Her message is followed by a promotional statement from her son Paul, who was a board member of Viscoil and an executive at its related company NRGLab.



BOOM: Nancy Pelosi's son Paul Pelosi Jr. (who went to Ukraine in 2017) was a board member of Viscoil and executive at its related company NRGLab, which DID ENERGY Business in UKRAINE! And Nancy Pelosi appeared in a promotional video for the company!

www.oann.com...



posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: chr0naut

I'm sorry you do not know what you speak of.

you can site the legal precedent for "exonerated"

there is NONE. so yeah exonerated doesn't mean what YOU think it's means

find a source to back up your BS, it's not there


The word you are fumbling with, is spelled "cite".

Why did you spell it correctly later on in your post. Do you, perhaps, have a multiple personality disorder?

And there are very many "legal precedents" which use the word "exonerated". Here is a search on the presence of the word "exonerate" in just one database of US federal statutes and case law. There is also significant state case law and statutory law not included in this database.

So, that would make your statement false, thedigirati, indicating either ignorance or a lie on your part.


Meuller did NOT write the report.


Mueller headed the team that compiled the report and the report bears his name and signature.

While it is likely that Mueller did not write absolutely everything in the report, there is no evidence at all that he did not write any part of, or have personal knowledge of the content of the entire report. As I said, it does bear his name and signature and he did lead the team.

Also it may well be possible that Mueller in the months after writing the report has forgotten some specifics of the 400+ page document. That doesn't mean that he didn't write it, it is just a factor of the way human memory works. The document itself sands in it's own evidence and is stronger evidentially, than Mueller's memories of it.

That is the way the law works, they don't tend to trust an entrapment TV interview, over a legal document produced by the DOJ.


I guess you missed his awesome questioning on TV a few weeks back.


No, I missed it but I have seen edited highlights where he was reluctant to discuss things that were sub-judice (that means that there were things he couldn't say because they may affect an ongoing legal case before the courts).

My guess is that you also have only seen highlights that were edited to fit some propagandist spin and that Mueller himself did not comment on the interview but instead, someone else who had not been involved in the investigation at all presented the propagandist view


if there was "proof of guilt" cite it.


See, now you spell it correctly. Wasn't so hard, was it.

I did cite proof of guilt, there are 10 instances of Trump's attempts at obstruction of justice in the Mueller report.

There you are, I have cited the Mueller report.




You really do not know what you are speaking of.


How could you possibly know what I know? Clearly you, personally, are no pinnacle example of rationality and knowledge.


yes you did say exonerated in your post, it just goes to show you don't even read what you type
"In the Mueller report, there are ten instances of things which Trump did which would have had the effect of obstructing justice. Mueller was quite clear that nothing in his report exonerated Trump and also that he would not indict a sitting President. You can't rationally interpret it any other way"

that was Your words correct??
why do you need to lie??


This is a link to your reply. I am unable to edit your replies, so I cannot be lying about it. Please click on my name from the start of your replying post and note from the pop-up of the quoted post that I didn't use the word "exonerated" in it.

If anything, you would be the liar for referencing an out of context post and even when your accident (if such it was) is pointed out, you compound the lie by not simply acknowledging the facts but you instead insist upon it. Which makes you doubly a liar.


I did point out

how shameful, now your credibility is all gone.

It's ok,we are used to it.


"We", really, "we"?..

Do you think that anyone of intellect or integrity would stand with you in your lie and irrationality?

Or, perhaps you are using it in the 'royal' plural?

Either way, Lulz,


edit on 5/10/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

Do they all (his aides and staff) laugh at him too, while they stand around listening to him tell them to do things and they just ignore them because...?

I'm sure you been in his private meetings many times to make this statement.


I was being sarcastic about how stupid your excuse-ism was.


Once again this type of statement is just pure hate for the man because Hillary had a 95% chance to win and you all can't get over it...ever.


I don't hate Donald Trump nor do I like Hillary Clinton.

Can you conceive that someone could approach all this rationally and dispassionately?


Trump is not a professional politician


No, he is a professional landlord and game show host.




and says what he thinks.


He thinks, what a novel idea!




We both no


I think you meant 'know'.


that is not the best way to do it, but its Trump and it is not going to change. Maybe instead of REEeeing on his sometimes silly comments you look at where we are at with his policies and then we can discuss in a reasonable way. These types of discussions I feel the left is doing them from their safe rooms.


While I would guess that you are pro-Reeeeepublican (as opposed to the more rational Republicans). I'm not even American. Not Democrat. Not Republican. Not Independent. Not Socialist. Not Communist. Not Fascist. Not Nazi. Not alt-Right and not alt-Left.

I suppose it must be confusing that I don't fit anything you judge others by. Perhaps you will have to expand your mental capacity to fit some other archetype?




posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 11:44 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Actually you can remove tags or change the text if you edit sometimes.



posted on Oct, 5 2019 @ 11:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: chr0naut

Actually you can remove tags or change the text if you edit sometimes.


I understand how someone may alter a tag within an edited post, but not on someone else's post.

I shouldn't have edit rights to that because it isn't my post.

Even so, the actual unique post ID is not an editable field and I'm fairly sure the database would be totally stuffed if you tried messing with hidden tags.


edit on 6/10/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: chr0naut

Actually you can remove tags or change the text if you edit sometimes.


I understand how someone may alter a tag within an edited post, but not on someone else's post.

I had eggs fot breakfast, they make me gassy.


I shouldn't have edit rights to that because it isn't my post.

Nobody in New Zealand cares if I sm gassy as they all have poor personal hygiene.

Even so, the actual unique post ID is not an editable field and I'm fairly sure the database would be totally stuffed if you tried messing with hidden tags.



Thats terrible.
Poor personal hygiene is a sin.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 12:55 AM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

lol, you don't have to be pro-trump to not want your political party to use a powerful weapon like impeachment for some cheap thrills. It'd be like trump using nukes on isis. You don't have to be pro-isis to think it's a terrible idea.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 12:58 AM
link   
Isnt nancy older than Bernie sanders? She's almost dead! Bernie our guy had a heart attack. He is lucky to be alive.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 01:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: chr0naut


... snip ...


See, you have just changed a post you had edit rights to.

You cannot edit the original post of someone else, just like I said. That was why I linked back to their post, which I cannot edit.

By the way, I could have reported you as I am sure such editing of the comments of others with insults is against T's & C's.


edit on 6/10/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 01:59 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 04:16 AM
link   
Uhhh..ohoh





Peace



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 04:51 AM
link   
a reply to: operation mindcrime



Haley got that BOOM BOOM




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 04:57 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen





Peace



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 05:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Let me guess - on Nov 8th 2020 you're going to the polls with your sharpie and writing in Hillary for the vote aren't you?

Our very own ATS court jester never fails



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 06:21 AM
link   
Pelosi // Schiff old video 1955 uncovered !!




posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 09:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: chr0naut


... snip ...


See, you have just changed a post you had edit rights to.
Exactly as I described.


You cannot edit the original post of someone else, just like I said. That was why I linked back to their post, which I cannot edit.


By the way, I could have reported you as I am sure such editing of the comments of others with insults is against T's & C's.
It is what I always do.



Dont be ashamed, it was no insult.
Funny you took it as one.



posted on Oct, 6 2019 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


I'm confused....are you excited about the letter from the Pentagon that undercuts Trump's "we withheld aid on concerns about corruption" narrative?

This letter was sent in June before Trumps call. The letter list out all the ways they CONFIRMED Ukraine has taken major steps to curve corruption and met the requirements of section 1250 of the NDAA.



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join