It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
Nobody is arguing that the Eiffel Tower doesn't exist.
originally posted by: EnigmaChaser
We also haven’t really addressed the financial aspect of this hoax. What did Judy gain? Money? Street cred on the UFO speaking circuit for a minute?
Given the cost of production relative to the payoff this angle has to be explored further.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
The Eiffel Tower, sorry, not going to believe it until I have some evidence I can hold in my hand.
Some kind of physical artifact directly linked to the object with a verified chain of custody.
Multiple opinions from independent experts saying that the thing is alien
Verification from authorities, including skeptics that the conclusions of the experts are accurate.
The ability for me to actually see / touch the thing in question to verify that it actually exists.
originally posted by: Soulece
If this was real, they would not allow such an astounding video and life changing video to be on youtube.
originally posted by: BelowBottomPublicity
a reply to: Blue Shift
Has any alien story ever lived up to those expectations?
How can I be so absolutely sure? Because it LOOKS real to me!
you could personally go to the Eiffel Tower.
originally posted by: BelowBottomPublicity
These attributes are rare for alien videos for a reason.
originally posted by: EnigmaChaser
Background of the OP of the video
Did they identify any clear signs of manipulation?
Does it match known film projectors?
Does it match known camcorders?
Does the sound match the projection?
Is the aging manufactured?
originally posted by: BelowBottomPublicity
You just want people to believe this is fake.
Well, you think it's real. What are you going to do about it?
originally posted by: Blue Shift
Well, you think it's real. What are you going to do about it?
originally posted by: BelowBottomPublicity
When your goal is to prove it wrong rather than objectively analyze, it clouds your judgement.
facts detailing the signs that are indicative of CGI, I added images to bolster my claims. You refuse to see it.
If there is ANY sign of digital manipulation
meaning if the timecode is fake it stands to reason than the video is fake.
The timecode was added and aged to appear as though it was part of the film not the camcorder.
You want proof so badly your willing to turn a blind eye to reason.