It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Agit8dChop
And the whistleblower had first-hand information. So what's the issue?
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Annee
This thread was debunked on the first page using the OP's source. Epic facepalm.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Agit8dChop
And the whistleblower had first-hand information. So what's the issue?
what? first hand information would be in the room, at the time. Unless you have some new info, what we heard is that the whistle blower heard from several sources. So no, it's second and third hand info.
This falls under the epic fail category.
SCOOP: The whistleblower complaint did not include the full transcript, and referenced several mainstream media articles as ‘evidence’
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Annee
This thread was debunked on the first page using the OP's source. Epic facepalm.
NOT
The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed
both first-hand and other information. The ICIG reviewed the information provided as well as
other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared
credible.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude
The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed
both first-hand and other information. The ICIG reviewed the information provided as well as
other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared
credible.
It should be noted that I'm not even a vocal supporter of impeachment. I may not like Trump but I've never backed impeachment. I'm simply pointing out the fact that the most spouted attempts to smear this whistleblower are false.
Apparently the whistleblower did provide first-hand information that was deemed credible and urgent. Apparently this whistleblower wasn't held to a different standard than those that came before.
So if the whistleblower did everything according to law, why do you want their identity revealed?
So if the whistleblower did everything according to law, why do you want their identity revealed?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: seeker1963
Even if the form changed right before the complaint was made, it's still a complete red herring. The ICIG made it clear that the whistleblower had both first-hand and second-hand information.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Agit8dChop
You ask why the form was changed? Lol
When you can't win within the rules you change the rules.
The complaint does not arise in connection with the operation of any U.S. government intelligence activity, and the alleged misconduct does not involve any member of the intelligence community. Rather, the com-plaint arises out of a confidential diplomatic communication between the President and a foreign leader that the intelligence-community complain-ant received secondhand. The question is whether such a complaint falls within the statutory definition of “urgent concern” that the law requires the DNI to forward to the intelligence committees. We conclude that it does not. The alleged misconduct is not an “urgent concern” within the meaning of the statute because it does not concern “the funding, admin-istration, or operation of an intelligence activity” under the authority of the DNI. Id. § 3033(k)(5)(G)(i).
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Agit8dChop
You ask why the form was changed? Lol
When you can't win within the rules you change the rules.
Maybe Trump wanted to make it easier for his toadies to rat out Obama holdovers?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: seeker1963
Even if the form changed right before the complaint was made, it's still a complete red herring. The ICIG made it clear that the whistleblower had both first-hand and second-hand information.