It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge Allows Cop to Use ‘Castle Doctrine’ Defense in Trial for Mistaken Apartment Killing

page: 3
8
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 2 2019 @ 07:43 PM
link   
10 years?

utter bull****

our just-us "system" is total garbage, we need to have the second amendment and if anything crap like this proves it




posted on Oct, 2 2019 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
10 years?

utter bull****

our just-us "system" is total garbage, we need to have the second amendment and if anything crap like this proves it


What are you talking about?

What does the 2nd amendment have to do with this?



posted on Oct, 2 2019 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

I'm just sick of seeing government get away with crimes or escape the justice they would dole out to others. Cops are the closest form of government authority to the citizens.

People's blind support for cops while they rail against government corruption is hypocritical at best.


edit on 10 2 2019 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2019 @ 06:09 PM
link   
First off? She's not a "cop". She is/was a "cop", now a former cop/"police". She didn't discharge her "weapon" in the "line of duty", or in "defence". She has been dis- "barred" from that "cop" title, title of nobility/authority.
Second? She shot/killed someone, (doesn't matter how, she did it, or how it was done), she killed someone in THEIR own "castle". Not her castle!

"Bearing arms" is a great responsibility, as is all freedom. Something that should not be took lightly. Personally, I believe if you ain't got the guts to die with honor and a smile, or you fear, that "they're",.."faster" than you"? You ain't got the guts or moral fortitude to be "bearing arms"! You're an "accident" waiting to happen.
Fear for yourself, is not a good reason, although a "lawful" reason, for "arms".
Fearing for "them" is the only reason.

She. This "cop" F'd up! There's no, if and, and a but about it!









edit on 28-10-2019 by murphy22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 28 2019 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

I know, right? You would think, the cop/police would turn around and "arrest" (detain) the/their "employers". Wouldn't you?

But "commissions" (titles) don't work that way. Not to mention they have "unions", (people's working party) behind them... "Law", is a f'n mess and a joke.




top topics
 
8
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join