Breaking: Desperate Democrats New Spin FISA Spygate Investigation Is Illegal!

a reply to: Extorris

Refferred, recommend, same thing.

It is not bs.

You do not refer if you do not recommend.

Also, you might be interested in the hearing today.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Nancy Pelosi has gone on record saying it is not an "outright" impeachment.

They have zero subpoena power unless they take a vote and
The House passes impeachment.

originally posted by: xuenchen
The Executive Branch has every legal right to investigate any and all criminal activity 😎

"Check" and "re-Balance" 😎

Especially since Bill Clinton himself signed a pact with Ukraine to do just that when he was President. They can ask for any material for an investigation in ours and we can in theirs lol. Coming back to bite slick Willey right it hurts. Rudy is the master at bringing thugs like this down. This will definitely be the caper on a fine career.

Impeach 44 and VP44 ... suspended from Twitter ... no surprise there! a reply to: xuenchen

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Extorris

Refferred, recommend, same thing.

It is not bs.

You do not refer if you do not recommend.

Also, you might be interested in the hearing today.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Not sure you know what a "hearing" is.

Nancy Pelosi has gone on record saying it is not an "outright" impeachment.

They have zero subpoena power unless they take a vote and
The House passes impeachment.

You are confused here as well. If they had impeached the President, the Senate would be conducting a trial. this is an impeachment inquiry or proceeding and under that status they absolutely do have court supported impeachment power, see the Nixon Proceedings.

a reply to: Extorris

If you would read the thread, you would find out
that there is indeed a hearing today on Ukraine.

Reading comprehension 101

a reply to: Extorris

They do not have Subpoena power until The House
votes and PASSES a majority vote.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Extorris

They do not have Subpoena power until The House
votes and PASSES a majority vote.

Nope. You need to think and research for yourself.

The House of Representatives has sole authority on what constitutes an "Impeachment Proceeding". They don't have to vote on anything.

They do have to vote to "Impeach" which comes after evidence is gathered and weighed.

Once they Impeach it goes to the Senate for trial.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Extorris

If you would read the thread, you would find out
that there is indeed a hearing today on Ukraine.

Reading comprehension 101

FFS the page you directed to AND the OP of the thread for that page and the posts on that page ALL say nothing about a "hearing"

I am not going to read 6 pages of BS to try and figure out what you are gibbering about.

Idiot circus.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Extorris

Refferred, recommend, same thing.

It is not bs.

You do not refer if you do not recommend.

IG's "refer" all the time. It is saying that they don't know if the evidence constitutes something illegal, so they "refer" it to DOJ for examination.

IGs are not qualified nor authorized to "recommend" prosecution.

That is actual, real world, law, policy and fact.

I keep trying to afford you room for honest error and you keep doubling down on belligerent ignorance.

a reply to: burntheships
The hearing is over.
Lets see what leaks.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: burntheships

Nope
The dems are mad because barr is actually investigating the mueller crap.
He will document it is all a lie.
He will prosecute.

They are scared and should be.

Maybe Mueller will finally find out who Mifsud is.......

LOL

a reply to: pavil
That would be something

Isnt he missing

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: burntheships
The hearing is over.
Lets see what leaks.

LOL

a reply to: Extorris
Nice of you to show up
Laughing boy

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Alexander Downer will have to make a decision..

a) stick with the Clintons and the deep state and risk the ire of the US global hierarchy punishing Australia

or

b) give the finger to Clinton and the deep state, reveal all, get in the good books with the US leadership (who still have 5-6years remaining in power) and hopefully rebuild trust with the AUS Taxpayer..

Downers a weasel, he'll take option B

Trump, Durham and Barr need to prove that they have Brennan, Clinton, Comey, Strzok, Mccabe and Ohr practically in cuffs. No one will help unless they're assured those 5 have no ability to inflict revenge or oust them.

Doesn't matter what he chooses, we have the audio he recorded with Papadopolus, supposedly.

He's damnned by his own words...... Just like Biden.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
Nice of you to show up
Laughing boy

Par
......,

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: pavil
That would be something

Isnt he missing

MIFSUD is in Italy, according to Reports.

Barr and Pompeo are in Italy.......

Coincidence?

a reply to: burntheships

www.state.gov... think its currently this guy

Marik String serves as Acting Legal Adviser of the Department of State. In this capacity, he advises the Department and Secretary of State on all legal issues arising in connection with U.S. foreign policy and the work of the Department. Mr. String has 15 years of legal, policy, and military experience at the Department of State, Department of Defense, United States Senate, think tanks in the United States and overseas, and in private legal practice. Previously, Mr. String served in the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, where he performed the duties of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs; Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary; and Deputy Assistant Secretary. He managed more than 400 officers and the U.S. government’s $200 billion annual arms transfer portfolio, including the compliance and enforcement functions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Previously, Mr. String served as Senior Advisor to Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan. Before joining the State Department, Mr. String practiced international and national security law at the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP in Washington, DC. He provided legal counsel to global clients in international dispute resolution proceedings and on complex regulatory matters involving economic sanctions, export controls, classified government contracting, national security investigations, and foreign investments and mergers requiring approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Prior to private law practice, Mr. String served on the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, where he held responsibilities as Deputy Chief Counsel and Senior Professional Staff Member. In addition to providing counsel to the Committee on legislation, treaties, and nominations, he served as the Committee’s lead policy advisor for NATO, European and Russian affairs, as well as regional arms control and non-proliferation issues. He also worked as a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at The Atlantic Council and at the Aspen Institute Berlin. Mr. String is an officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve.

a reply to: burntheships

Trump is going to be impeached. Haha

a reply to: richapau
www.latimes.com...

The Congress that may impeach Trump also is operating in a far different world than that of his besieged predecessors. Congress’ approval rating stood at 35% during the Nixon resignation year and was at 42% during the Clinton impeachment, according to Gallup polling. Those figures are Himalayan compared with congressional approval today. The Congress that may impeach Trump has an approval rating of 18%.

yeah good luck with that article goes on to say

Nixon never was impeached; he resigned in August 1974 as he faced certain impeachment in the House and likely conviction in the Senate. Clinton was impeached but survived a Senate trial in 1999. Even if Trump is impeached, he is unlikely to be forced from office given the difficulty of achieving a two-thirds majority in a Senate controlled by Republicans.

so yeah i expect at worst a repeat of the clinton impeachment attempt and the fall out that comes with it

www.msn.com... M6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8%3d&i10c.dv=15

Senate Democrats representing red states are worried the House impeachment process may spin out of control and destroy any chance their party might have of winning back the majority next year. These Democrats hope the House keeps its impeachment focus on the Ukraine controversy, and that Democrats act relatively quickly. If they do not, the red-state Democrats warn President Trump could turn the tables on them.

and hey wall street isnt too worried about impeachment but a bit worried about the new nafta deal being passed but even pelosi is on board with that one

www.cnbc.com...

When “the Republicans chose to impeach Bill Clinton, they were headed for a 40-seat win in that midterm election and the Democrats ended up winning five seats,” Clifton recalled. “So impeachment actually hurt the Republicans 20 years ago and that’s the risk the Democrats are taking by entering this fight.” Gardner noted Trump’s uncanny ability to leverage political drama and said the recent news likely hurts Biden’s odds of securing the Democratic presidential nomination. “Mr. Trump has a unique ability to manipulate these kinds of situations to his advantage and if the House moves to impeach him we think it could backfire on Democrats and help Mr. Trump’s reelection prospects. Democrats could easily overplay their hand and create a backlash that will unite Republicans,” Gardner wrote.

this plus the new impeachment inquiry into kavanaugh has us unified and pissed throw in not much passing in the halls of congress (18 percent approval remember?) and the base is motivated donating in record numbers and getting the old base fired up for a hopefully a repeat of 2016 election