It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The DIA testified to such under oath in front of Congress brudda.
I said "yet".
If this had happened under
Obama the person would be in jail already.
I'm neither prosecutor nor Congress, but from my POV his actions stink to high hell.
And you can't name a crime that President Trump has
committed can you?
Atkinson also notes that the ICIG "identified some indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate." But, that did not change their opinion that the complaint "appears credible."
He adds that requesting access to the records of the telephone call were "not necessary" to determine that the urgent concern appeared credible. He later notes that those transcripts would, however, be "relevant" to future investigations into the matter.
Let there be light.
Further, although the preliminary review identified some indication of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate, such evidence did not change my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern appears credible, particularly given the other information the ICIG obtained during its preliminary review.
a reply to: Phage He testified that the credible you cited did not mean the info was true.
You attempting to spin it as such AGAIN is vile.
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
Nobody can. I wonder why that is?
Luckily a President can’t be impeached because “in my opinion his actions stink”