It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Whistleblower Fears for Safety --- Schiff says Whistleblower Might Testify at Hearing

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:46 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




The DIA testified to such under oath in front of Congress brudda.

What's a DIA and what exactly did they testify to?
You mean DNI? And same question.

edit on 9/29/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage
DNI
My mistake



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:47 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Same question.
What did the DNI say that the IG's word "credible" means?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
So you can't support your claim.
I thought not.


I said "yet". Impatient much?

And you can't name a crime that President Trump has
committed can you?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage
I have linked the testimony to you previously.
Under questioning the DNI stated credible in this instance did not mean the information in the complaint was not "true".
You can pretend we did not discuss this brudda.
I can link it and PROVE your spin if you like brudda.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:52 PM
link   
The Whistleblower will testify behind a shaded screen and will use a voice altering amplifier system.

The Whistleblower will be led into the room surrounded by guards and will be wearing a disguise. 😹



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:52 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




I said "yet".

No, that's not what you said. This is what you said:

If this had happened under
Obama the person would be in jail already.



And you can't name a crime that President Trump has
committed can you?
I'm neither prosecutor nor Congress, but from my POV his actions stink to high hell.


edit on 9/29/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:53 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




Under questioning the DNI stated credible in this instance did not mean the information in the complaint was not "true".

I agree, the DNI did not say the information was not true.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:54 PM
link   
No crime, at all.
No impeachable offense, at all.

But “his actions stink”

No surprise there.

5 more years is guaranteed
edit on 29 9 2019 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

No crime, at all.
I didn't say that.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:58 PM
link   

Atkinson also notes that the ICIG "identified some indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate." But, that did not change their opinion that the complaint "appears credible."




He adds that requesting access to the records of the telephone call were "not necessary" to determine that the urgent concern appeared credible. He later notes that those transcripts would, however, be "relevant" to future investigations into the matter.
townhall.com...

Let there be light.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

And it is true, if this had happened to Obama the person
spy wannabe whistle blower would be in jail.

You can't name a crime that President Trump has committed.

Which shows that your willing to go along with usurping
the constitution just like the cohorts that are carrying
this coup on past 3 years.

And the only thing that stinks is the rotting corruption
that lies in the hearts of these unlawful people.

Its not over by a long shot, so you better get a
raincoat or you'll melt.


edit on 30-9-2019 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords



Let there be light.

Unfortunately the full context is not provided by your source.

Further, although the preliminary review identified some indication of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate, such evidence did not change my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern appears credible, particularly given the other information the ICIG obtained during its preliminary review.



edit on 9/30/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




And it is true, if this had happened to Obama the person spy wannabe whistle blower would be in jail.

Backtracking?



I said "yet".


Prove your claim.
edit on 9/30/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Phage

You can't name a crime that President Trump has committed.



Nobody can. I wonder why that is?

Luckily a President can’t be impeached because “in my opinion his actions stink”



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage
He testified that the credible you cited did not mean the info was true.

You attempting to spin it as such AGAIN is vile.
Brudda.

Are you vile brudda?



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak




Luckily a President can’t be impeached because “in my opinion his actions stink”

True. If that were the case every president ever would have been impeached.
But impeachment is, after all, a political process.



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:08 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




a reply to: Phage He testified that the credible you cited did not mean the info was true.

You attempting to spin it as such AGAIN is vile.

You attempting to claim that I said that is vile.

I said that the IG found the complaint credible. No more, no less.


edit on 9/30/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:09 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This is absurd. Fifty thousand dollars on their head? Im sure the united states government will gladly execute them free of charge if the whistleblower is indeed a seditious traitor.
edit on 30-9-2019 by drewlander because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 12:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

Nobody can. I wonder why that is?

Luckily a President can’t be impeached because “in my opinion his actions stink”


Yep. They want to impeach first, then find a crime.
They don't like what President Trump is doing policy wise,
they don't like the judges he is appointing!

They don't like it that the economy is booming, that people
have work options, that scares them.

They don't like Trump, he is mean!
So therefore he must be impeached!



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join