It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Whistleblower Fears for Safety --- Schiff says Whistleblower Might Testify at Hearing

page: 1
11
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 10:51 PM
link   
The Stakes just got jacked up in the case of the Whistleblower !!

The Whistleblower's lawyer says (S)He fears for safety !!

A "letter" first obtained by CBS News' "60 Minutes" (oh surprise) says the Whistleblower is scared H(is)er identity could get exposed !!

CBS had a big show about the whole thing.

Adam Schiff say the Whistleblower may be testifying before his Committee !!

The circus is on !! 😎

One guess who gets "The Blame" for "Safety" problems ?


Whistleblower's lawyer raises fears for client's safety

The intelligence whistleblower whose complaint on the Trump administration's dealings with Ukraine triggered an impeachment inquiry into the president fears for their safety, letters released Sunday night show.

Why it matters: One letter from the whistleblower's lawyer first obtained by CBS News' "60 Minutes" outlined concerns that the whistleblower may be identified. The lawyer specifically cites President Trump's demand to know who gave the whistleblower the information and states that a $50,000 bounty has been issued for anyone with information relating to his client's identity.

What's new: "60 Minutes" first reported that the whistleblower was under federal protection because of safety fears. But the whistleblower's lawyer Mark Zaid tweeted that 60 minutes" completely misinterpreted the contents of the letter.




Trump whistleblower will testify before the House Intelligence Committee “very soon”

Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday the whistleblower at the center of a growing scandal surrounding President Donald Trump will testify before the House Intelligence Committee “very soon.”

That whistleblower filed a formal complaint alleging Trump attempted to use “the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.” Reporting identified that country as Ukraine, and the solicitation to be a request to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, who is currently a Democratic candidate for president.

Trump has acknowledged asking Ukrainian leaders to investigate Biden, arguing — without evidence — the former vice president worked to shield his son, Hunter Biden, from corruption investigations in that country. The White House has released a rough transcript of a conversation between Trump and Ukraine’s president that contains the request, but Trump maintains he has not done anything wrong. Nevertheless, the whistleblower’s allegations have spawned an impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives.




edit on Sep-29-2019 by xuenchen because: 🍌 bananrama 🍌




posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 10:53 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
Are they fishing for a perjury charge for the whistleblower?
What other reason for them to testify under oath?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 10:57 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

If the President of The United States wished out loud that I would be dealt with like they used to deal with "traitors" I would be afraid for my safety as well.


+5 more 
posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a merry Christmas.


+13 more 
posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Spying on a United States President is most likely a crime,
Keep in mind this person works for, or worked for the CIA.

Not a newbie, they know the statutes.

Eventually they will have to go public if they want to
accuse President Trump of a crime.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:05 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Well this whistle-blower won't end up stranded in Moscow with a passport revoked Snowden style will he/she?

Likely be rewarded with a all expenses paid stay at Epsteins now renowned Island.

You only need to be worried if your a whistle-blower against the dems not for them.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: CthruU




Well this whistle-blower won't end up stranded in Moscow with a passport revoked Snowden style will he/she?

Since they followed the letter of the law (as opposed to Snowden), one would hope not.

But with this administration and its judges, who knows?

edit on 9/29/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: xuenchen

If the President of The United States wished out loud that I would be dealt with like they used to deal with "traitors" I would be afraid for my safety as well.


Assuming this Whistleblower isn't a disposable shadow identity created for political smear purposes using created "issues" with pre-determined intended "solutions". 😎



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: CthruU




Well this whistle-blower won't end up stranded in Moscow with a passport revoked Snowden style will he/she?

Since they followed the letter of the law (as opposed to Snowden), one would hope not.



That remains to be seen.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:14 PM
link   
a reply to: CthruU


That remains to be seen.
What does?
Do you think the DOJ has grounds to prosecute? What law do you think was violated?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:15 PM
link   
so he is going to a closed session?

well, whoever is missing during this meeting, is the "person of interest"


so the person of interest will be known within 24 hours.

Groovy!!


(24 hours after the closed session)

it will be closed (hacked) circuit TV from a remote location with a voice changer in a shadow...



w00t

oh that is already undercopyright to an insurance company, will they have to pay for comercial rights?

oh right loop hole, "Official US Government use"
edit on 29-9-2019 by thedigirati because: proper credit.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: underwerks

Spying on a United States President is most likely a crime,
Keep in mind this person works for, or worked for the CIA.

Not a newbie, they know the statutes.

Eventually they will have to go public if they want to
accuse President Trump of a crime.







The whole "spy" narrative isn't going to hold up. It's something Donald Trump said and then everyone rushed around trying to validate it any way they can. The whistleblower went through the proper channels and followed the law the correct way.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati




so the person of interest will be known within 24 hours.

If that's the case it would be a violation of the law. Those such as the whistleblower are supposed to be protected.


edit on 9/29/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)


+3 more 
posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:23 PM
link   


The Whistleblower Fears for Safety --- Schiff says Whistleblower Might Testify at Hearing

They are having trouble finding a stooge (ermmm..."whistle blower")
All they have found so far is a bad clarinet player.


+7 more 
posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yes Phage, an unimpechable witness

what a wet dream😊😊😊👍👍

You will never know your accuser😲😲

that used second hand knowledge😲😲

does that scare you too?

or not.X_XX_X✌✌

ETA why is there no "shakka" emoticon? 👋👋👋
edit on 29-9-2019 by thedigirati because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: underwerks

Spying on a United States President is most likely a crime,
Keep in mind this person works for, or worked for the CIA.

Not a newbie, they know the statutes.

Eventually they will have to go public if they want to
accuse President Trump of a crime.







I never even thought of the fact that someone spying on the president without proper authorization would be a crime. Why is this person still not charged with accessing classified information and giving it to the press?

I do not know any other president that would have put up with this crap. Good ol Willy would have stopped this when it started, his secret service men would have taken care of the person who was stealing classified information.
edit on 29-9-2019 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:25 PM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati




Yes Phage, an unimpechable witness

Do you even know what the word means?


You will never know your accuser
In court, you will. As yet, this is an investigation. Perhaps it will lead to where you think the Muellar investigation did. Perhaps not.


does that scare you too?
No. Does it you?
edit on 9/29/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:26 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks
Those who gave him the classified info aren't,as the whistleblower has documented ALL evidence is 2nd or 3rd hand.
Those who gave away secret info should face the full force of the law.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:29 PM
link   
The Committee hearing will be deluxe because the Whistleblower claims no first hand knowledge of anything 😃

So about 2 dozen more witnesses will be subpoenaed to "certify" and "authenticate" all the "allegations" 😃

Then the "Articles of Impeachment" will be voted on 😃



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

in this context yes, and if they can do this to a president, who needs a plaza in Texas anymore.

it's a perfect "magic" bullet.

the kickback will be amazing.

ETA: hypothetically speaking sorry, as though someone would use this as a political weapon.
edit on 29-9-2019 by thedigirati because: that would be low blow to actually whistleblowers



new topics

top topics



 
11
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join