It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Las Vegas Shooting: The Foundation Room Footage

page: 1
17
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:02 AM
link   
This is a new video compilation of the Vegas mass shooting that includes the apparent facts that many of the victims were killed with head shots from directly overhead and the coroners evidence and the videos of the incidents line up with the idea that these people were not running away because the shots were coming from overhead and they did not hear from their angle where the shots came from. The audio makes it clear that this was full automatic fire not just bump stock fire from Mandalay Bay as was reported at the time. Helicopters flying over the venue spraying targeted fire down below to create the mass causalities witnessed in Vegas that day is the conclusion of this video.




edit on 0110110101 by machineintelligence because: entry error




posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

Regardless, I think the militia needs to be regulated in limiting rates of fire and size of clips available for purchase.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:22 AM
link   
I liked the gun twirling at the beginning.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:22 AM
link   
snipers ,

lone gunman storyline is so played out.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:27 AM
link   
People laying down and pointing their melon in the direction of incoming fire at a very small angle of incidence (ie from above at some distance) would also result in holes in the tops of craniums.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Having bump fired weapons and also having been trained and operated full automatic weapons it is my assessment that what I heard on this and other video of the incident was in fact full automatic fire. Bump stock fire from drum mags is far more irregular. This was consistent with fire from a belt fed machine gun fired from the door of a helicopter from directly overhead of the venue.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:41 AM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

Sure but how to explain "automatic fire" sounds coming from close proximity vs "automatic fire" sounds coming in muffled just seconds before. At about the 4:00 mark. Start around 3:45?
edit on 29-9-2019 by Zelun because: muffled


eta: is it audio from the overlay?
edit on 29-9-2019 by Zelun because: the overlay?


yep, it's from the overlay, here's the original footage:


edit on 29-9-2019 by Zelun because: original footage



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 02:59 AM
link   
Lot of weird stuff that night. Shootings in a nightclub nearby, sounds like the airport had some things go down as well. First I heard about choppers in the air, would explain some of the airport stuff.

Saudi Arabia got some of the blame with some diplomatic falling outs afterwards. They apparently owned the floor from where the alleged shooter was. Not sure what their motive would of been.

Lot of things not adding up with all the reports around. Have any connections been made between the victims?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:07 AM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

I've never fired a weapon equipped with a bump-fire stock, but what I hear sounds exactly like full-auto weapons I fired in the service. Then again, I'm missing that crucial piece of information, being what a bump-fire sounds like. It can't cycle faster than it would as a semi, which would be about as fast as a full-auto or three round burst. I have fired on three-round-burst. It sounds like a "blaaap" in my experience. The M-60 sounds like ba-ba-ba-ba-ba, same as the SAW, while the .50-cal sounds like khu-khu-khu-khu-khu. Mark-19 is like "thwup-thwup-thwup-thwup," just for reference.

I think this video is disingenuous in that in includes the audio from separate perspectives overlayed as if it were from one perspective. I did like the pistol-twirling though.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Zelun


Sure but how to explain "automatic fire" sounds coming from close proximity vs "automatic fire" sounds coming in muffled just seconds before. At about the 4:00 mark. Start around 3:45?


You are hearing the bullets go supersonic. There is a saying that goes "you never hear the one that gets you" that is because the bullet is faster than the speed of sound.

2 videos below. One shows the mechanics of bullets both supersonic and subsonic. The second is a guy firing a .22 with a suppressor/silencer and he has some mixed rounds. Some are supersonic some are not.






posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

You are wrong! The effect I described is actually the mixing of audio tracks from multiple perspectives of that event. I suspect this mix was done purposely. And why not, after all? Youtube views equals money after all.

Ernst Mach revolutionized shockwave footage. Mach's laws are named after him, and even the speed of sound is memorialized as "Mach 1" and Mach's ideas about physics in general inform my own theories.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

Wait, are you saying I am wrong because the video is faked/doctored or are you claiming I am wrong because the shockwaves from bullets do not give off ghost firings?

As a veteran that has been under fire I assure you the second happens.


edit on 29-9-2019 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

And also, as a veteran, I don't appreciate being pandered to. The video in the OP is intentionally crafted to give the impression of multiple shooters. This assertion is not supported by the evidence presented, in fact the evidence presented has been presented in a disingenuous way to give the impression of multiple shooters, specifically shooters firing from helicopters. Totally offsides.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

The helicopter thing is BS IMO but the sounds from the gunshots are easy to understand. I still don't know if you are claiming the video was doctored, but if it isn't and there is a question as to the difference in sound of the rifles report that is explainable by the position of the shooter as well as the supersonic rounds.

The shooter position in the room at the beginning sounds like he has receded back some. Later it sounds like he is much closer to where he broke the window.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 03:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Listen to the rifle reports in the OP, then listen to the rifle reports in the original footage. I embedded it above. The sounds from the original are completely consistent with a single firing position, perhaps switching between multiple weapons.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 04:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

I am not American. I've read your earlier posts and I'm curious as to what you, Zelun thought happened that night?

It's clear we are Not being 'told the truth' as The Truth Is True, it doesn't change" and all will agree on it

Yet the 'investigation into the Truth of this event was, a bunch of conflicting bull# was said by various parties and it was Shut Down pretty quick, and god help those who had footage on their ph's . . . that conflicted with the 'official story'

whatever went down, it's not what we think

me? I thought it had something to do with DT and attempted assasinations of who knows?

But it's clear that 'the public' wasn't in a 'need to know' basis when it ALL simply 'went quiiet', Worldwide, why?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 04:57 AM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

If they were shooting from a helicopter overhead, where did all the casings go?



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 05:05 AM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyJetson

I'm glad you asked, JohnnyJetson. I think Paddock was an aging intelligence asset, probably more a liability than asset. Then an opportunity presented itself: a foreign asset of much more value(as assessed by the CIA) expressed a desire to "do a deal" in Vegas. The US intelligence community was then tasked with securing the life of this #bag, with the expectation of the further candid sharing of facts. Other national interests disagreed, and in an attempt to distract attention from an assassination attempt, local law enforcement was "directed" to a mass casualty situation... Meanwhile, the target escaped, because we don't # around, and the US was left with "just another crazy person" shooting up the place. I think Paddock was a patsy, an asset for the IC, who's mission was to entrap buyers of weapons. Things popped off, and they killed him, then used the props of his fake sale to enact a distraction in order to escape. I think it was a huge #up.



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 08:07 AM
link   
As a veteran, I always find it hilarious when people on more or less anonymous websites say “as a veteran...” when presenting their argument, as if it actually lends weight to their argument.

Multiple helicopters flying over the venue. Dozens or hundreds of people with cell phone videos. Nobody caught any of the multiple helicopters flying directly overhead and shooting straight down. Okay



posted on Sep, 29 2019 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: machineintelligence

Regardless, I think the militia needs to be regulated in limiting rates of fire and size of clips available for purchase.


I agree. The hughes admendment needs repealed, and every select fire should come with a hundred round drum.




top topics



 
17
<<   2 >>

log in

join