It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

John Brennan Calls For "Unlimited Number" Of Resistors To Activate

page: 8
72
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

I am confused how Mike Pompeo's awareness of a conversation makes it legal?

I suspect Pompeo will be resigning in the next 30 days.


Because Pompeo is authorized to cooperate with the DOJ
by President Trump.

Barr came out with a statement through the DOJ
that he had asked President Trump to introduce
the investigation though his diplomatic phone calls.

Cant fall for the fake news and go over a cliff.
You would be looking back with great regret.




posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 07:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Extorris

I am confused how Mike Pompeo's awareness of a conversation makes it legal?

I suspect Pompeo will be resigning in the next 30 days.


Because Pompeo is authorized to cooperate with the DOJ
by President Trump.

Barr came out with a statement through the DOJ
that he had asked President Trump to introduce
the investigation though his diplomatic phone calls.

Cant fall for the fake news and go over a cliff.
You would be looking back with great regret.


Still doesn't make it legal.

Especially if DOJ/Barr are just as corrupt, or the president using the DOJ for corrupt purposes. .



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 08:22 PM
link   
If everything is on the up and up with the FISA warrant used to surveil a rival political campaign and the Russia Gate investigation, why such an up roar that it is being looked in to? Why is the immediate take away that Barr must be corrupt? Isn't it possible he just thinks something stinks about it and is interested in following up on the IG report?
edit on 30-9-2019 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

Still doesn't make it legal.


Sure it does. It is perfectly legal, and there isn't anything
corrupt about it at all.

Oh the irony ...those who supported the FISA abuse
are about to get a big shock.



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

That communist Brennan is calling for every deranged lefty left in the IC to come up with more FALSE/FAKE claims. Whom would have "thunk" it?



posted on Sep, 30 2019 @ 11:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

Still doesn't make it legal.

Especially if DOJ/Barr are just as corrupt, or the president using the DOJ for corrupt purposes. .


Care to post the laws that Barr, or the POTUS have been abusing/breaking?...

Put your money where your mouth is or stfua.




edit on 30-9-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 06:41 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

I read the statement as
Dear whistleblowers. We are running out of agendas to overthrow Trump. If you have anything at all we can use to inflate and damage him. Give us a call.


Pathetic



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 08:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Extorris

I am confused how Mike Pompeo's awareness of a conversation makes it legal?

I suspect Pompeo will be resigning in the next 30 days.


Barr came out with a statement through the DOJ
that he had asked President Trump to introduce
the investigation though his diplomatic phone calls.



?

"the investigation" ?

Which one? Into Trump's political opponent Biden? Or into Crowdstrike, the firm that uncovered the Russian hacking?

"DOJ" first released a Statement saying AG Barr knew nothing about it.

Now they are releasing a statement saying Barr was working with Trump on this?

Please explain.

On a Sidenote, I find Bill Barr to be consistently dishonest.

This from his past is Deja Vu


He wrote legal justifications for the practice of rendition, so that the FBI could enter onto foreign soil without the consent of the host government to apprehend fugitives wanted by the United States government for terrorism or drug-trafficking.

Barr declined a congressional request for the full opinion, but instead provided a document that "summarizes the principal conclusions."

Congress subpoenaed the opinion, and its public release after Barr's departure from the Justice Department showed he had omitted significant findings in the opinion from his summary document.


Also this nugget


In 1992, Barr launched a surveillance program to gather records of innocent Americans' international phone calls.

The DOJ Inspector General concluded that this program was launched without a review of the legality of the program.

According to USA Today, the program "provided a blueprint for far broader phone-data surveillance the government launched after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001."

en.wikipedia.org...

www.usatoday.com...

Barr also coordinated the cover-up of the Iran-Contra affair


Iran-Contra
In late 1992, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh, who had been chosen to investigate the Iran–Contra affair, found documents in the possession of Reagan's former defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which Walsh said was "evidence of a conspiracy among the highest-ranking Reagan Administration officials to lie to Congress and the American public." Weinberger was set to stand trial on felony charges on January 5, 1993.[[48] His "indictment said Mr. Weinberger's notes contradicted Mr. Bush's assertions that he had only a fragmentary knowledge of the arms secretly sold to Iran in 1985 and 1986 in exchange for American hostages in Lebanon." According to Walsh, then-president Bush might have been called as a witness.

On December 24, 1992, during his final month in office, Bush, on the advice of Barr, pardoned Weinberger, along with five other administration officials who had been found guilty on charges relating to the Iran–Contra affair. Barr was consulted extensively regarding the pardons, and especially advocated for pardoning Weinberger.

Walsh complained about the move insinuating that Bush on Barr's advice had used the pardons to avoid testifying and stating that: "The Iran-contra cover-up, which has continued for more than six years, has now been completed." In 2003, he wrote an account of the investigation in his book, Firewall: The Iran-Contra Conspiracy and Cover-Up.

Because of this and Barr's unwillingness to appoint an independent counsel to look into a second scandal known as Iraqgate, New York Times writer William Safire began to refer to Barr as "Coverup-General Barr." Barr, however, responded that he believed Bush had made the right decision regarding that and he felt people in the case had been treated unfairly. Barr said that Walsh was a "head-hunter" who "had completely lost perspective."

en.wikipedia.org...-:14-45


Trump picked the right guy. "Coverup-General Barr"


edit on 1-10-2019 by Extorris because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 09:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Liquesence

Still doesn't make it legal.

Especially if DOJ/Barr are just as corrupt, or the president using the DOJ for corrupt purposes. .


Care to post the laws that Barr, or the POTUS have been abusing/breaking?...

Put your money where your mouth is or stfua.





Just off the top of my head

Bribery, Extortion, Campaign Finance Violations, Soliciting Campaign Contributions and Donations by Foreign Nationals, Misuse of Public Funds, Obstruction of Justice, Honest Services Fraud, Witness Intimidation, Conspiracy, Misuse of a classified system


edit on 1-10-2019 by Extorris because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

The delusion is quite scary. I do agree that the impeachment will fail in the Senate and Trump will win another term and it'll be much worse than this one. But, the willful ignorance here is laughable at best, and deeply concerning at worse.



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 11:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Extorris

Nope. You can charge him with that bs all day long just like the idiotic Demwit politicians do, but they never give specifics, much less legal evidential proof that it is so. Lyin' hate-filled CNN pundits don't count when they say someone with direct knowledge told another someone who told the NYT who then told that certain someone with direct knowledge....you know the tricks they play.

I can say you are a thief, a drug-dealing scumbag, a liar, and a seditious conspirator all day long, but unless I lay down actual proof with documentation, it is all hyperbolic bs.



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Extorris

Which investigation you ask?

Barr announced immediately following the Special Counsel
report that he had opened an official investigation into the
matters pertaining to the 2016 election, and the events
and people that led up to the FISA warrants, and the
Special Counsel appointment.

You know, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe etc.

It was all over the news months and months ago.
Now some people want to pretend they didn't know that?



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships



Now some people want to pretend they didn't know that?

or pretend such is an abuse of power......

ongoing investigations are a bear....



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 01:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: burntheships



Now some people want to pretend they didn't know that?

or pretend such is an abuse of power......

ongoing investigations are a bear....



They sure are, and will likely prevent any disclosure of documents.
Barr and Durham traveling all over the world tracking down
the criminal activities, and the msm was yammering about
the wall and detention centers. Ha!

Guess they thought no leaks equaled nothing was happening.



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   
Heard yesterday that John Brennan traveled to the Ukraine
using a fake passport, and an assumed name.

While he was director of the CIA!

At first the Obama administration lied and said it
didn't happen, but they finally have admitted it.

What in the world???

Why would Brennan need to hide his travels to Ukraine???



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
Dear Mr Brennan,

I believe that I witnessed a major felony being committed the other night on the television, namely Conspiracy to Commit Treason against the people of the United States. I do not feel comfortable at this time naming all the names as co-conspirators are still coming forward at this time.

The specific questions I did want to ask is to as if the powers of citizen’s arrest still allows for nationwide jurisdiction for those that witness a felony and that any force including lethal force can still be used to make an arrest? You can understand my hesitation as the laws seemingly change without notice lately on various aspects of the law. Changed almost on a whim anymore it seems.

Thank you for your years of service. As a student of history, I can tell you that General Benedict Arnold did some wonderful things for this fledgling country before turning traitor. Unfortunately history will not look as kindly of today’s crop as they contributed no benefit at all.

Wish you luck with the future, you will need it.


C'mon dude, imagining yourself as Benedict Arnold is a little harsh, don't you think?



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 04:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

oddly fun historical fact,there is a monument to his leg (he was wounded 3 times in the same leg in the revolution before turning trator due to shippens manipulations and his lack of pay) so while we hate him we did dedicate a memorial to his heroic leg even though its regarded as a damnatio memoriae en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

Just off the top of my head

Bribery, Extortion, Campaign Finance Violations, Soliciting Campaign Contributions and Donations by Foreign Nationals, Misuse of Public Funds, Obstruction of Justice, Honest Services Fraud, Witness Intimidation, Conspiracy, Misuse of a classified system



How about you post FACTS instead of your delusional BS. Post EVIDENCE that POTUS Trump bribed and extorted the Ukranians... Campaign finace violations have been shown to be yet another FARCE,, alongside with every imagined crime you mention.

Post EVIDENCE not CLAIMS, not DELUSIONS, but EVIDENCE.

For example, the real crime was committed by Biden when he admitted on video that he withheld over $1 billion dollars unless the Ukranians got rid of the prosecutor whom was about to investigate his son, and his involvement with Burisma Holdings.

That's a FACT. It isn't imagined, and it isn't made up. Biden had a conflict of interest since his son was going to be investigated by the Ukranian prosecutor. Then the previous Ukranian administration put someone who was pro-Clinton/pro-Biden, and dropped the investigation.

How about this, excerpt DIRECTLY from the phone call POTUS Trump had with Ukraine showing evidence that he bribed them... HE DIDN'T, but Biden did.

Why would Trump need to bribe the Ukranians in the phone call on July 2019 when the Ukranians were trying to FREELY give that info to the Trump administration since 2018? It makes no sense, and you know it. But like demonrats, there is not one inkling of honesty in you to admit the facts.

We have the entire transcript of the phone call and NOWHERE does POTUS Trump bribes the Ukranians, nor does he threatens them like Biden did and ADMITTED.

There were 5 investigations into the POTUS from the days he was a candidate and even as POTUS, and NONE OF THEM SHOWED EVIDENCE OF THE CRIMES YOU LEFTIES ATE UP.

The Obama/Biden administration did abuse their power by investigating EVERYTHING about Trump without any evidence of wrongdoing. They only used FAKE CLAIMS from a foreign agent, whom used Russian official's claims. That was the real "election tampering by the Russians." Not to mention the fact that the present Ukranian administration has stated they have proof that the Obama/Biden administration rigged the 2016 elections in the U.S. with the previous Ukranian administration in favor of Hillary Clinton.

Even the latest "whistleblower claim" has been shown to be yet the latest SCAM from leftists and "never Trump camp," Two days before the release of the complaint someone changed the whistleblower form to allow hearsay as evidence. But in reality this will not hold, but demonsocialists know this and they are only trying to bog down Trump's administration as much as you all can to try to dissuade people to vote for someone else. But it won't work.

Democrats Wrote to Ukraine in May 2018, Demanding It Investigate Trump

Ukrainian to US prosecutors: Why don't you want our evidence on Democrats?

The Hill: U.S. Embassy Pressured Ukraine Not To Investigate Liberal “Mega-Donor”

The “Whistleblower Complaint” isn’t a whistleblower complaint, it’s a closing argument

Democrats’ double standard on Ukraine

Intel Community Uploaded Altered Whistleblower Form 2 Days Before Complaint Released to Public



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

If the socialists had an open an shut case Pelosi wouldn't be worried about the democrats loosing the House in 2020.
If their case was as strong as Brennan and Pelosi are trying to convince America it is they should win all 435 seats in the house!!
But they know better!!!



posted on Oct, 1 2019 @ 09:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Boadicea
Trump also asked for help in the Crowdstrike server issue and to look at the corruption of the Bidens.
He is allowed to do this by Treaty with Ukraine.
For reference for anyone curious-

dcwhispers.com...

edit on 1-10-2019 by Bob350 because: clarity



new topics

top topics



 
72
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join