Traitors will attempt to bring down UK government next week

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.

www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

D

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: UKTruth

Those are children.

We have around 320,000 homeless people nationwide.

Its not Labour nor Coburn that's been known to burn £50 notes around poor tramps.

That's your side.

And thats not the half of it.

For goodness sakes will you not give it up with all your constant stream of "Tories are evil" stuff?
Please, get a sense of balance.
Both sides are far from blameless.
All this one sided partisan politics does nothing to help.

originally posted by: UKTruth
Lot's of REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Eurgh just like American debates, buzzwords and pretty useless childish memes and the like, gotta make out the other side are delusional and beneath you though, forget we are all human.

think its fair to say neither BJ, NF or JC are any use to the vast majority of the public.

a reply to: oldcarpy

Naw. X

And only some of them are evil there support are just misguided and a little delusional.

a reply to: andy06shake

There are always two sides to every story but for your part you only ever promote the one side.
Anyway its friday and off to watch the Andrew Neil dodger and Steptoe on Bbc now.

Up yer clunge!

🍻🍺

a reply to: oldcarpy

Well for the life of me i just canny seem to swallow all that Tory twaddle.

As it kind of somewhat sticks in my craw nevermind results in the death of poor people all over the shop.

Perspective is what it is i suppose.

Happy Friday to you also McBlane.

originally posted by: UpIsNowDown

originally posted by: UKTruth
Lot's of REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Eurgh just like American debates, buzzwords and pretty useless childish memes and the like, gotta make out the other side are delusional and beneath you though, forget we are all human.

think its fair to say neither BJ, NF or JC are any use to the vast majority of the public.

Did you watch the video? The childish prat is completely unstable.
Just screeching at the sky because he's buthurt that he lost the brexit debate.

What a bloody whirl wind of month...the wife refused to take me back, my own grandson Barry evicted me from his home because he said he couldn't bare to hear my hateful rhetoric any longer. Never thought I'd find myself homeless and typing messages from an Internet cafe on a freezing night in December but here I am. Humbling? Yes. For over 50 years I've voted Tory or more recently the Brexit party, I believed I was doing the right thing and that all this jibe about people starving was bunkem. It's not until you find yourself on the receiving end of fate that you realise perhaps you were wrong. I still have my polling card and for the first time in my life I will not be voting for Conservative or the Brexit Party. It sticks in my throat to say this, but I will vote Labour. I have a mediation meeting with the wife on Friday, hoping I can show her I've changed and that she'll take me back.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

UKTruth, it pains be to say that I once looked up to you, idolised you even. But I'm afraid to say that I now see you are nothing more than a buffoon. Good luck to you.

a reply to: UKTruth

If you're not on the streets how do you ken where they are?

One in 107 children in Great Britain are currently living in temporary accommodation.

That's approximately five homeless children for every school in the country.

Maybe that should be the headline?

originally posted by: DougHole64
What a bloody whirl wind of month...the wife refused to take me back, my own grandson Barry evicted me from his home because he said he couldn't bare to hear my hateful rhetoric any longer. Never thought I'd find myself homeless and typing messages from an Internet cafe on a freezing night in December but here I am. Humbling? Yes. For over 50 years I've voted Tory or more recently the Brexit party, I believed I was doing the right thing and that all this jibe about people starving was bunkem. It's not until you find yourself on the receiving end of fate that you realise perhaps you were wrong. I still have my polling card and for the first time in my life I will not be voting for Conservative or the Brexit Party. It sticks in my throat to say this, but I will vote Labour. I have a mediation meeting with the wife on Friday, hoping I can show her I've changed and that she'll take me back.

So, your wife refuses to take you back, your grandson evicted you from his home and you are in an internet cafe posting here....hmmmmmm....may be you should pause and consider why your wife wont take you back....your children aren't even mentioned....and your grandson has thrown you out..... this has nothing to do with your political views....but clearly to my mind you as a person. Please pause and think about why your family wish to have nothing to do with you ....I wish you no ill will....
Rainbows
Jane

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.
I understand completely that you can't admit that, so it's all good.
Don;t think it's really going to matter that much anyway... left wing talking points seem to be having little effect.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.

Clearly not as you seem to not understand the difference between homelessness and sleeping rough.

If you want news papers to dumb down their headlines for you perhaps I could recommend the Sun or the Daily Star.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.

Clearly not as you seem to not understand the difference between homelessness and sleeping rough.

If you want news papers to dumb down their headlines for you perhaps I could recommend the Sun or the Daily Star.

The Guardian is a left wing rag - not news.
It's for those that lose elections and like to cry about it.
I am sure it's your favourite newspaper.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.

Clearly not as you seem to not understand the difference between homelessness and sleeping rough.

If you want news papers to dumb down their headlines for you perhaps I could recommend the Sun or the Daily Star.

The Guardian is a left wing rag - not news.
It's for those that lose elections and like to cry about it.
I am sure it's your favourite newspaper.

Left wing - yes
Rag - matter of opinion

It's headline was still accurate.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.

Clearly not as you seem to not understand the difference between homelessness and sleeping rough.

If you want news papers to dumb down their headlines for you perhaps I could recommend the Sun or the Daily Star.

The Guardian is a left wing rag - not news.
It's for those that lose elections and like to cry about it.
I am sure it's your favourite newspaper.

Left wing - yes
Rag - matter of opinion

It's headline was still accurate.

Rag. So much so they rehashed an old story, dressed it up for election week and tried to push it as news.
As we can see it's already been lapped up by those in a panic about the polls - hoping to push it as a conservative issue, when it's actually more of a Labour issue.
Still, I do understand why you're in a panic about next Thursday.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.

Clearly not as you seem to not understand the difference between homelessness and sleeping rough.

If you want news papers to dumb down their headlines for you perhaps I could recommend the Sun or the Daily Star.

The Guardian is a left wing rag - not news.
It's for those that lose elections and like to cry about it.
I am sure it's your favourite newspaper.

Left wing - yes
Rag - matter of opinion

It's headline was still accurate.

Rag. So much so they rehashed an old story, dressed it up for election week and tried to push it as news.
As we can see it's already been lapped up by those in a panic about the polls - hoping to push it as a conservative issue, when it's actually more of a Labour issue.
Still, I do understand why you're in a panic about next Thursday.

Pretty sure we have had a Tory government for last few years, not a labour one.

No panic at all. Party I am going to vote for looks like it will do very well.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: gortex

"At least 135,000 children in Britain to be homeless at Christmas"

Headlines like this should make anyone but hardcore heartless bastards think twice about supporting another 5 years of Tory rule.


www.theguardian.com... MPPBHmRdr00QXzQq5BO6GF6QWOp1i7LM

At least 135,000 children will be homeless and living in temporary accommodation across Britain on Christmas day

Ah, election week. The shills are are out in force.
So, accordig to the left wing rag you linked, not homeless then. Living in temporary accomodation.
Most of the problem - over 50% of it - and the rise is coming fro London.
Perhaps Londoners need to start kicking out Labour in their constituencies and elect a Tory mayor.

Living in temporary accommodation is homeless.

Living in temporary accomodation means just that.
Homeless, as the left wing rag knows, envokes images of kids on streets huddled in the cold.
Pathetic electioneering headlines.
Besides looks to be mainly a Labour area issue.

That may be your view but it's not how its used in government statistics.

Possibly consider that wealthier areas with less homelessness are more likely to vote Tory.

I doubt the Guardian article was intended to provoke a serious debate on Govt statistics or definitions.
It's a left wing rag with a headline leading up to an election.

So you think kids staying overnight in a hostel have a home?

No, I know they are not on the streets. Safe, warm and fed over Christmas.
Not really what the left wing rag was aiming for though with their headline.

I noticed you failed to answer the question.

The 'left wing rag' is reporting figures from a major charity and using official government definitions.

If you find that misleading it seems more to do with your lack of understanding than anything the Guardian is doing.

No, I understand exactly what the left wing rag was doing - as do you.

Clearly not as you seem to not understand the difference between homelessness and sleeping rough.

If you want news papers to dumb down their headlines for you perhaps I could recommend the Sun or the Daily Star.

The Guardian is a left wing rag - not news.
It's for those that lose elections and like to cry about it.
I am sure it's your favourite newspaper.

Left wing - yes
Rag - matter of opinion

It's headline was still accurate.

Rag. So much so they rehashed an old story, dressed it up for election week and tried to push it as news.
As we can see it's already been lapped up by those in a panic about the polls - hoping to push it as a conservative issue, when it's actually more of a Labour issue.
Still, I do understand why you're in a panic about next Thursday.

Pretty sure we have had a Tory government for last few years, not a labour one.

No panic at all. Party I am going to vote for looks like it will do very well.

Lol, you think the govt is responsible for how many kids come from broken homes and have to hit the streets?
Spoken like a true leftist - society is going to hell in a handbasket and it's the Gubmnts fault.
You're truly clueless.
Oh and btw the SNP are meaningless. Scotland will remain governed by England, you just get to play at it with an impotent Scottish Parliament.