It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Nothin
When it comes to science it's best to trust the majority consensus.
Hi STS.
All hail ! The Majority Consensus™ !!
originally posted by: EvilAxis
originally posted by: Nothin
Hi EA.
Thanks for the vid, but it didn't convince me.
Is that what is deemed a 'call to authority' ?
It is.
But the way to differentiate between a legitimate and a fallacious appeal to authority is by evaluating the nature and strength of the authority. On complex matters requiring specialist training and knowledge it's rational to consult experts.
Despite a very high degree of consensus and certainty (see video), they could be wrong. Or they could be deliberately misleading us.
What motive do diverse groups of climatologists from different countries working under no single controlling authority have for engaging in a joint global conspiracy to deceive?
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Nothin
When it comes to science it's best to trust the majority consensus.
Hi STS.
All hail ! The Majority Consensus™ !!
Yes, science is awesome.
originally posted by: Fowlerstoad
a reply to: Nothin
Whom to trust?
I think a better way to figure out the truth would be to identify first 'who not to trust'.
Don't trust: big oil, politicians who want to tax carbon (or tax anything else!), scientists who have their research grants paid for by others, and speakers who get paid to give certain viewpoints (including the MSM who are paid to advertise).
That doesn't leave behind many trustworthy sources at all, IMHO.
I look for small, ad hoc climate organizations such as Suspicious0bservers ( suspicious0bservers.org... ), as some of the leading trustworthy sources.
originally posted by: InTheLight
Hi Nothin, you pose an interesting question here but all I can say is "plant a tree then hug a tree". How can it hurt?
I look for small, ad hoc climate organizations such as Suspicious0bservers
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: turbonium1
So are you saying there is absolutly no evidence that we are causing climate change? No evidence at all?
There is no evidence of climate change, that's what the records prove.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: turbonium1
So are you saying there is absolutly no evidence that we are causing climate change? No evidence at all?
It is really hard to convince someone of global warming when they think the earth is flat and gravity doesn't exist.
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: turbonium1
So are you saying there is absolutly no evidence that we are causing climate change? No evidence at all?
It is really hard to convince someone of global warming when they think the earth is flat and gravity doesn't exist.
Sorry that evidence matters to me, instead of what 'experts' claim is true!!
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: turbonium1
So are you saying there is absolutly no evidence that we are causing climate change? No evidence at all?
It is really hard to convince someone of global warming when they think the earth is flat and gravity doesn't exist.
Sorry that evidence matters to me, instead of what 'experts' claim is true!!
What evidence? Please post your sources so we can look it over.
originally posted by: Nothin
How is Joe-Public supposed to be able to tell, whom the "right" scientist is, and whom the "wrong" scientist is ?
What city do you live in, or what state, and then, we'll take a look at the historical data of temperatures, around there...
I'll wait for your reply, so please go ahead..
ii) You will not Post, use the chat feature, use videos, or use the private message system to collect or ask for the personal information (data mining) about forum members, including email addresses and "real life" names, in any manner whatsoever, or for any reason whatsoever.