It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The whistle blower form in April of 2019 to include secondhand accounts

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Veryolduser

Trumps conversation with the Ukrainian president happened on July 25th.

www.washingtonpost.com...


Awww good point it did happen on July 25. however what the whistle blower presented is secondhand information that doesn’t meet the guidelines because it’s basically office gossip. I get what you are saying if it happened he’s guilty but it seems extremely strange the guidelines changed to allow this right before the complaint was submitted




posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Veryolduser




secondhand information that doesn’t meet the guidelines because it’s basically office gossip.

False.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Could you reference the page sir ?



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

Page 6



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: xuenchen

Whistleblower guidance from 2016. Sounds pretty 2nd hand to me.


Denise tells her coworker, Adam, she just completed a new classified report for their supervisor, Mr. Snyder. Denise also confides to Adam that Mr. Snyder deliberately revised portions of her analysis with false information to mislead leadership. Adam is surprised, but Denise says Mr. Snyder has done this with a previous classified report as well.



Because Adam has good reason to believe that misconduct is occurring in his work unit, he is required to report this misconduct


www.dni.gov...




Can you direct me to where specifically it says it’s from 2016?



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Veryolduser

In the document properties.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Why are you linking to my post?

I asked you for proof that the spy did not use a form?



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




Why are you linking to my post?

I'm not. My post is pid24650045, yours is pid24650040.



I asked you for proof that the spy did not use a form?
Sure. Let me get some proof that unicorns don't exist first though.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You asserted that the spy did not use a form.

Back it up with proof, or then it is nothing more
than your unicorn opinion.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

As I said



If I'm not mistaken...


I'm probably not. There is no requirement that a form be used nor is there a requirement that information be first hand.


edit on 9/27/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   
An additional analysis:


Folks, this “Ukraine Whistleblower” event was a pre-planned event.

As we begin to understand the general outline of how the Schiff Dossier was assembled, we are now starting to get into the specifics.

First discovered by researcher Stephen McIntyre, there is now evidence surfacing showing the ICIG recently created an entirely new ‘whistleblower complaint form’ that specifically allowed for the filing of complaints “heard from others“.
More at: theconservativetreehouse.com...-172125



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Veryolduser




secondhand information that doesn’t meet the guidelines because it’s basically office gossip.

False.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Only problem with your document is the acting DNI stated my point on tv as the reason why he didn’t originally address the situation as it didn’t fit the definition of whistle blower guildlines namely first hand account. Your not doing some type of #ery are you?



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Veryolduser




Only problem with your document is the acting DNI stated my point on tv as the reason why he didn’t originally address the situation as it didn’t fit the definition of whistle blower guildlines namely first hand account.
I thought it was because the DOJ told him not to.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Thank you

You are referencing a training document for protecting whistleblowers .




Our topic is on The disclosure of urgent consent forms parameters .



In the training document Adam must report his gossip to his supervisor to be protected as a whistle blower .




Not meet the parameters for a disclosure of urgent consent form .



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

As I said


If I'm not mistaken...


I'm probably not.



Oh LOL.
High horse, giddiup. Rainbows and Skittles too.

Whatever, as usual with your assertions,
You can't back it up then, so there it is reasonable to
assume the spy used a form as stated in the OP.




edit on 27-9-2019 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

In the training document Adam must report his gossip to his supervisor to be protected as a whistle blower .
And we hear that this whistleblower did report to others before he filed his complaint to the IG.



Not meet the parameters for a disclosure of urgent consent form .
Now show me where use of the form is required.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:37 PM
link   
This is where the investigation that matters (US/UKR DOJ) is focusing.

Jump to 1min 15sec to hear Joe Biden bragging about how he had the Ukraine prosecutor fired who had the nerve to investigate his son's $50,000 @ month golden-goose employer. Not from a "grapevine" source, but from the horse's mouth...JOE BIDEN.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:38 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Quit derailing the thread.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: xuenchen

Whistleblower guidance from 2016. Sounds pretty 2nd hand to me.


Denise tells her coworker, Adam, she just completed a new classified report for their supervisor, Mr. Snyder. Denise also confides to Adam that Mr. Snyder deliberately revised portions of her analysis with false information to mislead leadership. Adam is surprised, but Denise says Mr. Snyder has done this with a previous classified report as well.



Because Adam has good reason to believe that misconduct is occurring in his work unit, he is required to report this misconduct


www.dni.gov...




ex]Denise tells her coworker, Adam, she just completed a new classified report for their supervisor, Mr. Snyder. Denise also confides to Adam that Mr. Snyder deliberately revised portions of her analysis with false information to mislead leadership. Adam is surprised, but Denise says Mr. Snyder has done this with a previous classified report as well.


Because Adam has good reason to believe that misconduct is occurring in his work unit, he is required to report this misconduct


You are aware of how hypocritical this example is? It is basically saying that if someone revised a document to get “Leadership” in trouble that person should come forward as a whistle blower. The revision of this whistleblower form is exactly what the situation is talking about
edit on 27-9-2019 by Veryolduser because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 05:41 PM
link   
There are several inconsistencies in the account by
this spy. So it is hard to believe anything they said
is credible, when the key points have already
been proven false.

And most of the media hype is also false,
and lies mixed with a little truth.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join