It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Political Conspiracy - Planted Whistleblower Honeypot

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 02:25 AM
link   
This is speculation, conjecture, and completely head canon. There is no truth to this post AFAIK.
This is just a series of events, that I consider 5D Chess.

Here's a series of events, in an alternate universe, they are true.

Ukraine has a mole in the German government.
Trump finds out about this person.
Trump sets in motion a series of events to utilize this person, as follows.
Donald Trump gets forced to release a diplomatic conversation between himself and Ukrainian President, after having strategically withheld aid to Ukraine, and planting a false whistleblower.
This makes it grey area enough, to force the release, while Trump is careful enough to sidestep Quid Pro Quo in direct statement. He makes the appearance of a possible quid pro quo.

In the transcript that gets publicly released, both Donald Trump AND the President of the Ukraine bad mouth Angela Merkel, and Germany.
Rudy Giuliani and Trump are the only two in on the plan at the moment of the original conversation.
Rudy Giuliani proceeds to speak to the President of Ukraine, letting him know that Angela Merkel and/or Germany will likely do something to attempt to aid the Democratic Candidate running for the United States Presidency in 2020.
Rudy and Ukrainian leadership discuss using the Ukrainian mole to obtain evidence of this attempt, and turn the situation on it's head.
Convenient entrapment for the exact thing that Trump is being accused of, with the shoe on the other foot.



The only part of the current situation that doesn't make sense to me...

Is the fact that NO news source, is formally speaking about the fact, that Merkel was bad mouthed so bad in the transcript by two country leaders.
This transcript release has to be very awkward for Germany. Yet, somehow, all the news is focused on the Ukrainian aid, Biden, Trump, Giuliani, Pelosi, and impeachment.

Everyone's skipping over the fact that Germany got called out, hard, and this should have been private and NOT published.

I'm wondering if some German action, was the intended reason this occurred in the first place.

Maybe we have a "phantom" or "planted" whistleblower.




posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 02:31 AM
link   
A conspiracy theory in two memes







posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

That would be legendary but...

 "Not a direct witness to most of the events described in the complaint"

Peace



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 02:52 AM
link   
a reply to: operation mindcrime

Who do you figure leaked to the blower?





posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 02:53 AM
link   
Or, Trump is the unwitting plant and being used to justify a left-wing social fascist coup of the United States government. Why else would the people who supposedly despise him and against everything he stands for give him free air-time that has been valued at over 4 billion dollars during his run for the presidency in 2016?

Trump is little more than an opportunistic predator and thus easily predictable and the perfect fit for a Manchurian candidate.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 03:07 AM
link   
a reply to: sooth

Or pied piper.


“The variety of candidates is a positive here, and many of the lesser known can serve as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right. In this scenario, we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more ‘Pied Piper’ candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party,” read the memo.

“Pied Piper candidates include, but aren’t limited to:
• Ted Cruz
• Donald Trump
• Ben Carson
We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to [take] them seriously."



classic blunder



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 08:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
A conspiracy theory in two memes






Take the "whistle" part out of that last meme and you won't be far from the truth..




posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 08:28 AM
link   
In the same spirit as this topic.

If they move to impeachment, wouldnt that allow a much broader range of subpoenas and witnesses testifying under oath?

This means we get all the nefarious characters from the DNC on the stand, sworn in to testify. Wouldn't this be a good thing?

I say let them move forward, then use the blanketing, sweeping jurisdiction of an Impeachment trial to play them against each other.
edit on 27-9-2019 by KnoxMSP because: (no reason given)



The more I think about this the more it seems like a setup, and they are playing right into it.
edit on 27-9-2019 by KnoxMSP because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 08:44 AM
link   
Never attribute to Malice that which can be explained by (Trump's world famous) stupidity.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 11:15 AM
link   
Add in this, and my theory sounds not so far fetched. Why would his atty say this unless they want impeachment to move forward.

www.buzzfeednews.com...
edit on 27-9-2019 by KnoxMSP because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: KnoxMSP

Well, there's two aspects to be evaluated to come to some kind of understanding I believe:

On one hand, you have a client who almost all lawyers refuse to represent, who is well known for not following legal advice, as well as not paying his lawyers. One would imagine that this implies Trump is not attracting the best and brightest lawyers as council.

On the other hand, Trump has done a remarkably large amount of nonsensical and seemingly unintelligent things at the (assumed) behest of his lawyers. Its not unreasonable to suggest that they just once more goofed hilariously by earlier suggesting the very thing that's happening now.



posted on Sep, 27 2019 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: KnoxMSP

Well, there's two aspects to be evaluated to come to some kind of understanding I believe:

On one hand, you have a client who almost all lawyers refuse to represent, who is well known for not following legal advice, as well as not paying his lawyers. One would imagine that this implies Trump is not attracting the best and brightest lawyers as council.

On the other hand, Trump has done a remarkably large amount of nonsensical and seemingly unintelligent things at the (assumed) behest of his lawyers. Its not unreasonable to suggest that they just once more goofed hilariously by earlier suggesting the very thing that's happening now.



If that is the best you got, you got no room accusing anyone of being unintelligent.

Your counter is "nu uh, they ar tooo dumb". Right...



new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join