Whistleblower: White House tried to ‘lock down’ call details

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

Is this the story hour.

Let me go get my yoga mat.

With you every hour is story hour.
Trump has beaten you again.
For the 7th time, ask adam schiff.
Do youvalso enjoy tab?

Schiff Gets Crushed for ‘Making up Quotes’ About Trump Controversy — Claims It’s ‘Parody’

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is claiming that his opening remarks during Thursday’s House Intelligence hearing with acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire were meant to be “part in parody,” as he’s being called out for them. “Adam Schiff lied for TWO years about a phony Russia collusion hoax. He promised evidence that didn’t exist,” Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said, adding, “The American people won’t fall for his lies about [Donald Trump] today either!”

ijr.com...

In light of Thursday's public release of a 'whistleblower' complaint, who was "not a witness to most of hte events described" in their allegation that President Trump abused his office to request that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden's dealings in the country, former CIA analyst and National Security Council (NSC) official Fred Fleitz has provided his take on the whole thing via Twitter.

www.zerohedge.com...

intelligence.house.gov...

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Well, it states that the memorandum that was issued that it was not a verbatim transcript, as a footnote. And, the whistleblower compliant states the verbatim transcript, which numerous professionals have attested always exist, at least in the form of original recordings, have been filed in a top secret file.

Are you saying that you believe that the "letter" that Trump lovingly released to the media is the only summary/transcript of the 30 minute conversation?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Are you saying that you believe that the "letter" that Trump lovingly released to the media is the only summary/transcript of the 30 minute conversation?

No, it has wording that implies it may be redacted... And we know there were more conversations.

My questioning of an alleged more secure server comes from the only source to my knowledge is a whistle blower who doesn't have first hand knowledge... And the media's insatiable appetite to run with whatever they're given.

If it comes out that's the case, I'll acknowledge it... But as it stands it's an allegation, one people are acting off of after only one day as fact.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Well, it states that the memorandum that was issued that it was not a verbatim transcript, as a footnote. And, the whistleblower compliant states the verbatim transcript, which numerous professionals have attested always exist, at least in the form of original recordings, have been filed in a top secret file.

Are you saying that you believe that the "letter" that Trump lovingly released to the media is the only summary/transcript of the 30 minute conversation?

The whistleblower complaint comtains NO FIRSTHAND INFORMATION.
it is all unsubstantiated rumors

a reply to: CriticalStinker

After 2017, when verbatim transcripts of his conversations with the leaders of Australian and Mexico were leaked to the press, the White House began to restrict the number of officials who had access to the transcripts. One former Trump administration official confirmed that the White House started placing transcripts into the codeword system after those leaks.

www.politico.com...

The whistle blower may not have 1st hand knowledge, but his witnesses do. You know, the ones that Trump wants outed and treated like traitors were treated "before"?

a reply to: Stormdancer777

Hell of a time for "Parody" 😃

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CriticalStinker

After 2017, when verbatim transcripts of his conversations with the leaders of Australian and Mexico were leaked to the press, the White House began to restrict the number of officials who had access to the transcripts. One former Trump administration official confirmed that the White House started placing transcripts into the codeword system after those leaks.

www.politico.com...

The whistle blower may not have 1st hand knowledge, but his witnesses do. You know, the ones that Trump wants outed and treated like traitors were treated "before"?

They are not witnesses
They are leakers
That is illegal making them criminals

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CriticalStinker

After 2017, when verbatim transcripts of his conversations with the leaders of Australian and Mexico were leaked to the press, the White House began to restrict the number of officials who had access to the transcripts. One former Trump administration official confirmed that the White House started placing transcripts into the codeword system after those leaks.

www.politico.com...

The whistle blower may not have 1st hand knowledge, but his witnesses do. You know, the ones that Trump wants outed and treated like traitors were treated "before"?

They are not witnesses
They are leakers
That is illegal making them criminals

That's why there is the Whistle Blower Protection Act. Good thing this whistle blower followed the law to a T!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CriticalStinker

After 2017, when verbatim transcripts of his conversations with the leaders of Australian and Mexico were leaked to the press, the White House began to restrict the number of officials who had access to the transcripts. One former Trump administration official confirmed that the White House started placing transcripts into the codeword system after those leaks.

www.politico.com...

The whistle blower may not have 1st hand knowledge, but his witnesses do. You know, the ones that Trump wants outed and treated like traitors were treated "before"?

We went from a president who weaponized the archaic espionage act to jail whistle blowers to a president who allegedly hides his diplomatic cables to prevent it.

While I prefer the latter, there has to be transparency and balances of power and oversight when needed. If he holds on to them against the will of congress, I'll speak out.

a reply to: Oraculi

youtu.be...

And now Trump wishes out loud he could kill the person who gave the whistleblower information. Which if the complaint is true, is a number of people on his staff.

“I want to know who’s the person, who’s the person who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that’s close to a spy,” he continued. “You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

Link

Strange response for a perfect, innocent phone call..

originally posted by: underwerks
And now Trump wishes out loud he could kill the whistleblower.

“I want to know who’s the person, who’s the person who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that’s close to a spy,” he continued. “You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

Link

Strange response for a perfect, innocent phone call..

We have multiple examples of people, politicians, actors wishing that Trump would be killed.

Free speech.

a reply to: xuenchen

Its not the first call that went into the super secret server.

a reply to: DBCowboy

The President of the United States wishing out loud he could kill the people who alerted the public to his criminality is a tiny bit different.

Just a tiny bit.

a reply to: shooterbrody

a history of being on the wrong side of things.... hmmmmm is that so?

Cuz that sounds like an opinion to me and the fact that I am seldom on the wrong side of things when it comes to the news and actual events that are taking place is evident to anyone with half a brain who reads here.

Notice how the dems are posting less and less?

You think you guys chased them away... when in fact you did but not for the reasons you think.

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: DBCowboy

The President of the United States wishing out loud he could kill the people who alerted the public to his criminality is a tiny bit different.

Just a tiny bit.

The wish only counts if he blew out all the candles, duh.

a reply to: shooterbrody

The data suggests otherwise.
The guy is scared out of his wits. He needs the USA.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Silly, you have been wrong since the first bs accusation.

Smh

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

The data suggests otherwise.
The guy is scared out of his wits. He needs the USA.

What data?