Transcript released - WH - No quid pro quo

originally posted by: weirdguy
Nancy just released a new press statement

She looks like she just opened a Christmas Present .. I wonder if she realizes what’s in the box .

zelenskyy commits suicide!
Hilary seen in the area.

originally posted by: Gorgonite
The Trump admins only chance at getting out of this is attempting to normalize this behavior. Based off some responses in this thread he very well may be successful.

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

originally posted by: Stealu1two
in the end they all need term limts and all the names on the list that have paid off others for sexual harassment need to be posted to the public our tax payer money went to those payouts.. Congress in general is the most corrupt outfit in the US..IMO

Nah, I'm against term limits.

What is needed is financial full disclosure laws that are applicable to any/all elected officials during the course of their 'service', in the same vein of the laws requiring any regular citizen to prove the source of any/all money they want to use to buy anything of significance, like property/houses, etc.

Their tax returns, bank records, everything, should be an open book, available to any reporter or government oversight official, at any time during their time of service.

Put an end to the 'get elected, get rich' gravy train and see the rats abandon ship.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
To me, in my opinion, that "favor" is a stipulation. A quid pro quo, if you will.

Your nickname is obviously 'stretch'... cause that is all you are doing.

Thats ok though, I am totally enjoying watching the dems self-destruct, have fun hitting the bottom of this black hole you have fallen into.

originally posted by: Gorgonite
This is just a piece of the puzzle and it’s damning. Trump clearly asks a foreign leader to investigate his political rival and work with his personal lawyer. This is collusion people. Remember that whole thing that was investigated by Mueller? Yeah, this is that.

The Trump admins only chance at getting out of this is attempting to normalize this behavior. Based off some responses in this thread he very well may be successful.

I don’t understand why you people aren’t pissed? The Trump admin thinks you people are so stupid you will buy anything they say. They are telling you this behavior is ok and you are eating it up. Do you have any self decency left at all? Trump has played you like a fiddle.

The Dems have lied to you for two years about the Mueller report. They claimed they had the impeachment goods and you bought it.

This is an absolute nothing burger. Nothing was promised by Trump. There wasn't a threat to deny funding (unlike when Ukraine was investigating Joes son).

What are you scared of? Trump just asked the Ukraine President to look into some shady crowdstrike actions with the DNC server and to see if there was anything to Bidens self professed statement that he got a prosecutor investigating his son fired.

If Biden did nothing wrong nothing will be found. Kind of like the 2 year 30 million dollar Mueller investigation of Trump.

Hell I say investigate them all.....Democrats and Republicans alike.....shake all the bad apples out of the tree. If they are innocent we wont find any evidence to allow conviction just like the Mueller report.

Lol.....

originally posted by: Gorgonite
It doesn’t matter if the foreign leader offered the dirt to Trump, or if Trump asked for it. Taking anything of value from a foreign government is a crime.

By all means, please prove it by citing the exact law that was broken.

Also, asking for someone to investigate something is not 'taking something of value', so, even if you are able to link to the actual law, it would not be applicable.

K

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gorgonite
It doesn’t matter if the foreign leader offered the dirt to Trump, or if Trump asked for it. Taking anything of value from a foreign government is a crime.

By all means, please prove it by citing the exact law that was broken.

Also, asking for someone to investigate something is not 'taking something of value', so, even if you are able to link to the actual law, it would not be applicable.

We have an agreement with the Ukraine to help each other investigate criminal activity. Trump can have them look into any criminal activity he wishes. Biden and his Sons activity looks like quid pro quo to me.

The Dems sure are nervous about Ukraine coughing up information on Crowdstrike. I wonder why...lol

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: dfnj2015
please point out where specifically?

You have to read in between the lines and see not what was said, but what wasn't.

It's there you will find the truth, this will DESTROY trump.

If it isn't there, it can't be used..!!

If something isn't said, one can assume, but one cannot use assumptions as evidence.

That is of course unless your a Democrat.. Then feelings and opinions can definitely be used as evidence...lol

originally posted by: MisterSpock
3 Black unmarked helicopters landing at white house right now.



Looks like trump will be in cuffs withing minutes.

Well if that were actually the case.. You'd probably be in a state of civil war about ten minutes later..!! lol

a reply to: Agit8dChop

She still has not read the full Mueller report.
If the Democrats thought Trump was working for a foreign government and was a traitor. Why did they agree to stuff like giving him 80 Billion Dollars more than he asked for the Military,

a reply to: contextual
Like your avatar you must be a communist. Sad.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Anybody know if this Treaty 106-16 has been "repealed" ? 😎

Treaty 106-16 (Ukraine)

Heh, Biden voted for that.

originally posted by: Ansuzrune
a reply to: contextual
Like your avatar you must be a communist. Sad.

There's quite a few on ATS. Wannabes at least anyway, playing revolutionary and probably wearing all that Hippie/Communist regalia like berets, surplus military uniforms with hammer and sickle patches sewn all over, fake war medals, long overcoats, unbuttoned to ensure the Che Guevara T-Shirt underneath is on display.

They are inspired by the 60's movement where that stuff was all the rage. They cry "death to capitalism", yet don't fully understand the world they'd be living in if their dreams ever came true because the romanticized version of communism was drummed into them by some Marxist college professor, who neglected to inform them of the suffering and human cost of the ideology or the "truth of why", so many perished.

They aren't that hard to pick with the things they post and their choices of Avatars.

The name of the "whistle blower" spy is going to break soon.

Revealed by the NYT that she/he is a Brennan groupie
and was a low level analyst working for the CIA who
was assigned to the White House to spy on Trump.

Brennan has also just tweeted out praise for her.

Her name is out there already, two men
have put up a 50,000 dollar reward.

Busted!

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: xuenchen
Anybody know if this Treaty 106-16 has been "repealed" ? 😎

Treaty 106-16 (Ukraine)

Heh, Biden voted for that.

Yup.

And some new provable documents are published about the Biden lies and crimes 😎

double post

Dunno' why..

Keeps happening while editing previous posts..

I end up quoting myself.

I must be tired..lol

Ignore this..

a reply to: dfnj2015

Hence once more you are wrong... The present Ukranian administration wanted to come to the U.S. to give FREELY the information that shows the DNC/Obama/Biden/Hillary administration attempts to use the former Ukranian administration to rig the U.S. election in 2016 in favor of Hillary Clinton... They also spoke about Joe Biden withholding over $1 billion dollars unless the former Ukranian administration would fire the prosecutor whomw as about to interview Hunter Biden's involvements with Burisma holdings and it's corruption. Joe Biden blackmailed the former Ukranian administration, which was already pro-Obama/Biden/Clinton, and this is a clear sign of a conflict of interest.

NOWHERE in the transcript of the POTUS' conversation with the Ukranian President does POTUS Trump try to blackmail Ukraine.

Again, the conversation of POTUS Trump with the Ukranian President was on July 2019, and democrats are falsely claiming POTUS Trump froze $400 million a few days before the conversation, yet in fact the Ukranian administration was trying to bring all that evidence freely since sometime in 2018. But the then U..S. ambassador to ukraine, put in power by Obama, was blocking the visas for the Ukranian officials.

The following article is from APRIL 2019, 2 months BEFORE POTUS Trump had his conversation with the Ukranian President...

Ukrainian to US prosecutors: Why don't you want our evidence on Democrats?

a reply to: xuenchen
www.scribd.com...
John Solomon Drops HUNDREDS OF PAGES of Documents Implicating Hunter Biden in Ukrainian Scandal

thehill.com... d=IwAR3L93N3qtXZ7J8mGdLBlElBJwrwJFnWmVXGeYjN1ccvHPu3GB_1EEjY1eM


and there is more

FBI Epstein coverup

a reply to: burntheships

The identity of the whistleblower is almost 100% that of Sue Gordon. She resigned on August 2019 because she wasn't promoted to be the "director of national intelligence."

Sue Gordon Resigns As Deputy Director Of National Intelligence After Being Overlooked For Promotion

Notice the statements given by those who know whom she is. First, the whistleblower had not heard in first person the conversation. Instead some people she was in communication with told her, but they didn't go into detail what POTUS Trump talked about with the Ukranian President. To me this tells me this person no longer is part of the intelligence community. But still has communications with friends within the intelligence community.

Those Republican senators who know whom the whistleblower is have stated the whistleblower had an ax to grind with POTUS Trump's administration.

Also, if you notice all senators whom know who the whistleblower is continually refer to the whistleblower as a "he or she." I can't recall which Fox Journalist it was, but that journalist mentioned the whistleblower as a "he" yet the Republican Senator weight in and said "he or she" didn't even hear the conversation but was told about it.

a reply to: Stormdancer777

Yup those are the ones !! 😎 👍