It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm thinking Warren's success has been pushed by the DNC after the talk of Biden's bragging episode was brought up. That could have resulted from the investigations in Ukraine as well. If the DNC got wind of this operation, they could easily get the MSM to give Warren a shove over Biden. Now they need to throw him under the bus and pull this impeachment nonsense to keep the heat off themselves.
At some point, stare into the mirror and ask yourself why your continously wrong as a result of the liberal media you watch?
originally posted by: Gorgonite
originally posted by: Arnie123
It's all feed for their audience of low info voters.
originally posted by: jhn7537
What's crazy is there was no quid pro quo, this is obvious, but turn on CNN and you would think Trump went "if you dont investigate Biden, we wont give you foreign aid".... they are beyond delusional
Already we have a few users afflicted from the data transfer and pushing out opinions as facts.
I find it interesting that you claim CNN is lying without proof, yet you believe Trump who has changed his story on this matter alone a dozen times.
At what point do you ask yourself, “Why am I accepting the word of a liar as gospel?”
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Wayfarer
I can give you props for sounding confident at least. Incorrect, but confident (which I guess is the whole Trump MO so par for the course).
So pray tell, can you cite either Constitutional paragraph/section or legal title/code where it is illegal for the president to suggest a meeting between a foreign dignitary and a US citizen?
For the record would you mind informing ATS what exactly your legal credentials/expertise consist of?
I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on ATS. About the same as you, in other words.
Only I give legal references. Where's yours?
Gotcha, you’re one of those Trump supporters.
So, the transcript literally shows Trump directing Zelensky to work with Rudy on the Biden and Crowdstrike investigations
You’re one of those very useful naive folks who will reject what they see with their eyes and ears for the story spun by Trump.
You really need to self reflect on what you stand for.
You are bending yourself over backwards to protect the interests of Trump. You don’t stand for anything of value, just whatever protects Trump and his interests.
That is sad. I honestly feel bad for you. I know you aren’t capable of understanding why this is sad, but maybe one day you will realize you were manipulated like a puppet.
Do you realize you are defending illegal behavior because why?
What are your values?
originally posted by: MrRCflying
What is the deal with new members (within the last 2 days)?
Seems like there is a payroll for this.
You and I have the same extensive legal background.
However to put it clearly what you're arguing isn't a crime because of semantics. When the president is extorting a foreign official, anyone who enables that extortion on behalf of the president (Guliani) is also committing a crime.
Obviously there is no evidence of Pelosi doing anything wrong, but it gets my attention that she is blowing this out of proportions. Why now?
There has to be some seriously damaging dirt on the Democratic Party in the Ukraine for them to jerk this hard.