It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The cowardice of the left

page: 24
85
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 02:05 AM
link   
Psychic Crystal Ball Projection found !!!!!!

The U.S. House of Representatives devolves into total CHAOS !!!!

Nov 4, 2020 ...............





posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 04:40 AM
link   
Many use the comparison of Nazi Germany and Hitler.

I like to look at he road we are on and look into the future.
At some point in the near future we will have another Hitler figure, probably in America, and they will say it all started in 2008.
Then, no more Hitler comparisons.

I hope this site stays up long enough that I refer back to this thread and say "TOLD YA SO!"



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 10:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DBCowboy

Is it not Trump that likes to comment on the weather with maps and sharpie nonsense?


The wee lassie made perfect sense.

As to cowards would that not also be your Nam dogging sore-footed POTUS?



Are leftists capable of debating without a childish insult?



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DBCowboy

Is it not Trump that likes to comment on the weather with maps and sharpie nonsense?


The wee lassie made perfect sense.

As to cowards would that not also be your Nam dogging sore-footed POTUS?



Are leftists capable of debating without a childish insult?


Posted un-ironically in a thread with 'leftist douche-waffles' in the OP...



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Is your POTUS capable of such a feat?

The wee lassies made perfect sense imho.

The science makes a debate somewhat one-sided.

If we don't change a billion people are dead or in serious trouble 50 years from now, and that's a conservative estate.

What happens to all those nuclear reactors dotted along our first world coastlines?

Because turning them off is problematic, and removing them and the radioactive byproducts in the entirety is pretty much imposable unless we get our act together collectively and sharpish.
edit on 25-9-2019 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

50 years?

Sweet, I thought we only had 12.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Muninn

50 years is my understanding if it's 12 years, they billion people are already in a hell of a predicament.

We would need to come together pretty much overnight to address that kind of window of time.

Either way, change is happening, nature will roll along right over the top of us with or without our consent.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Muninn



Either way, change is happening, nature will roll along right over the top of us with or without our consent.



As nature has done since the beginning.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Muninn

Aye, but we did not have the technological base and infostructure, nor a world population of 7.7 billion people in the past.

These type of changes probably won't wipe humans from the face of our Earth, but it will take away of our technological base, reduce our industrial and agricultural capabilities and possibly bring about a new dark age for a significant percentage of the people on the planet and reduce our numbers drastically.

Or we can come together for the correct reasons and not the bankers and corporations, get our collective act together and do something about it.

The choice is simple if you ask me.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Is your POTUS capable of such a feat?

The wee lassies made perfect sense imho.

The science makes a debate somewhat one-sided.

If we don't change a billion people are dead or in serious trouble 50 years from now, and that's a conservative estate.

What happens to all those nuclear reactors dotted along our first world coastlines?

Because turning them off is problematic, and removing them and the radioactive byproducts in the entirety is pretty much imposable unless we get our act together collectively and sharpish.


You forgot to say, "think of the children".



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Is your POTUS capable of such a feat?

The wee lassies made perfect sense imho.

The science makes a debate somewhat one-sided.

If we don't change a billion people are dead or in serious trouble 50 years from now, and that's a conservative estate.

What happens to all those nuclear reactors dotted along our first world coastlines?

Because turning them off is problematic, and removing them and the radioactive byproducts in the entirety is pretty much imposable unless we get our act together collectively and sharpish.


You forgot to say, "think of the children".



Joe Biden is ALWAYS thinking of the children.




posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Why?

Some of them seem to be thinking for themselves.

Or at least assimilating the factual evidence presented by science.

As opposed to our own generation sticking there heads in the sand.
edit on 25-9-2019 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Krakatoa

Why?

Some of them seem to be thinking for themselves.

Or at least assimilating the factual evidence presented by science.

As opposed to our own generation sticking there heads in the sand.


That phrase typically goes along with the doom porn message in order to affect the "feelz" of the reader. Because, you cannot debate with a child, so it's usually a slam dunk for the debater.

That is why.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 01:03 PM
link   
Glad to see the Democrats got their asses skinned today. 😎

Glad to see Trump actually concerned about the Democrat connections to foreign money laundering that funnels cash into Democrat campaigns. Lots of foreign aid get laundered back to Democrats. 😎

Worried that many American Democrat supporters condone these money laundering methods.

And My God !! Adam Schiff spoke this morning and man has his voice and general demeanor changed !! Wonder why that is?🤣



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 02:03 PM
link   
The left is the best...



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You had no qualms with the Nayirah testimony whatsoever, or did you?

Boomerz... always great for a giggle or two. Hooo-raaaay, Rah, Rah, Rah!


edit on 25-9-2019 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




The left are the worst of cowards.

And the right are the most corrupt self serving hypocrites who only care about their wallets and not who they hurt.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Wardaddy454




Its real to her, because that's what she's been fed.


How would you know? :-)

While we're on the subject - how did you come to form your opinions? You seem rather well fed your own self


I've got a 70-30 shot at being right. I like those odds. Again, who is she? Why is she so important? She's not the first kid to speak out about climate change.

I form my opinions by allowing myself to listen to everyone. I'm willing to listen to the scientists that disagree, and provide their evidence. Unlike many of you.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DBCowboy



Where are the dino eggs and little foots in that meme?
You are really slipping....no kudo feelz for you today.




top topics



 
85
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join