It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

You won’t believe what CNN just did !!!

page: 2
63
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Fallingdown

I know how you right wingers are very critical of so called left-wing media outlets like CNN and MS-NBC. But have you ever looked in the mirror of what your channel is doing?


Before you click the link. Ask yourself do you feel Vox is a reliable unbiased source?
Allsides
You using the leftist Vox to attack the most watched news Network in America is laughable. You can't find a better indicator that you are part of a fringe minority group who worship an extreme ideology. For your sake I hope you realize this sooner rather than later...




posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


FOX News is about 50-50 with Trump, and was 50-50 with Obama.




I want what you're smoking.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Oraculi

originally posted by: Grimpachi
Actual reporting has been somewhat fair all along with all of them. It is the pundits that have been biased idiots on both sides. They are entertainment deceptively presented as news and they all lie or twist the truth to fit a narrative for a respective party.


It is the pundits. The reporting is mostly on point on all sides, the journalist portion of the networks. It's the pundits that muddy the waters.

What would really surprise me is if I read that Maddow and Hannity were seen cavorting at a party, or something like that.

Come to think of it, no it wouldn't. It would kinda make sense.


I didn't realize that Hannity was into guys.

I learn something new every day.



haha funny

No, the other definition of cavorting, having fun exuberantly, dancing around, socializing. Nothing sexual I meant.

Then again you never know, Hannity is supposedly such a stud, she could change lanes for him.




posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:41 PM
link   
Minnesota may go red, but Wisconsin is purple since the last election.

We now have a rabid-left, horse's a** for governor.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:42 PM
link   
a reply to: mtnshredder

They're doing that because their ratings are in the toilet, not because they want to.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:45 PM
link   
The executives must sit in their board meetings pissing themselves laughing while coming up with ways of getting the public to chase their tails.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 06:50 PM
link   
Damage control is obvious.
Sure fits the current way of the world.
Recalling one of Dennis Leary's great skits... "Hey, ... I F*ed up. "



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 07:00 PM
link   
they'll prolly do it again - using Cooper with pom poms and the fake emotions pokerface



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Sympathy star I’m magnanimous on my threats . ✌️



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


FOX News is about 50-50 with Trump, and was 50-50 with Obama.




I want what you're smoking.

It's called truth. Maybe you can dispute it.

The Harvard scholars analyzed the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the main newscasts (not talk shows) of CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC during Trump's initial time in office.

The numbers for previous presidents: Barack Obama, 41 percent negative, 59 percent positive; George W. Bush, 57 percent negative, 43 percent positive; and Bill Clinton, 60 percent negative, 40 percent positive.

That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC.

Others were slightly less negative. The Harvard team found that CBS coverage was 91 percent negative and 9 percent positive. New York Times coverage was 87 percent negative and 13 percent positive. Washington Post coverage was 83 percent negative and 17 percent positive. Wall Street Journal coverage was 70 percent negative and 30 percent positive. And Fox News coverage also leaned to the negative, but only slightly: 52 percent negative to 48 percent positive.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

So FOX was negative as well, but basically 50-50, same as they were for Obama.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 07:45 PM
link   
As the election gets closer you will see more corporations come out for Trump. Democrats are starting to scare major corporations. You have people making them out to be evil entities that need to be destroyed.

So even the news media is owned by evil corporations who are not going to like the socialist agenda.

I truly wish AOC and her group would move on so the adults can have real discussions



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Fallingdown

Where in Minnesota. In 2016 9 counties voted for Hillary, 78 voted for Trump. Hillary still won because all you need as a Democrat is to pander to the big cities.


They touched on that in the video. Around 40,000 votes made the difference in Minnesota and the people they were interviewing were Democrats that are going to vote Republican.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 07:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Fallingdown

Where in Minnesota. In 2016 9 counties voted for Hillary, 78 voted for Trump. Hillary still won because all you need as a Democrat is to pander to the big cities.


They touched on that in the video. Around 40,000 votes made the difference in Minnesota and the people they were interviewing were Democrats that are going to vote Republican.



The iron range is one of the few counties/areas that were blue. Most of the rest were the dense urban areas.

So if they are losing voters up on the iron range AND maybe some who voted independent last round vote for trump(top 2 independents in MN got around 180K votes). MN is dangerously close to going red.



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

I think the older lady in the video hit on the reason why those areas were blue.

Those iron mining areas were union.

If the Democrats start losing their unions in the rust belt and Pennsylvania. Things will be looking pretty sweet for the good guys .



posted on Sep, 21 2019 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: mtnshredder

They're doing that because their ratings are in the toilet, not because they want to.

That’s absolutely correct. The sad part about it is that they’re doing it for monetary reasons and not one of integrity.



posted on Sep, 22 2019 @ 12:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

I am not sure it would be good for the good guys as the unions would be under assault with the GOP in control. Look at what happened in Wisconsin when GOP got control, their big push was to screw unions any and every way they could hurting workers and supporting CEOs.



posted on Sep, 22 2019 @ 12:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Yay team!

*pom poms*

😂



You are so smart and above it all. Thank you for posting your self-aggrandizing claims of political nihilism with a fervor matched only by vegans. Not everyone will agree with you. And that's okay. You are still smart.



posted on Sep, 22 2019 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
Actual reporting has been somewhat fair all along with all of them. It is the pundits that have been biased idiots on both sides. They are entertainment deceptively presented as news and they all lie or twist the truth to fit a narrative for a respective party.


Show me a journalist that hasn't spun in on CNN. I am willing to entertain the all sides are fair journalist study you have handy.
Ok so my actual observation since DJT became POTUS, as I was a hater of FOX kinda guy before this to be honest. This helped change my mind:

I see it as not one on the left is allowed to report anything that can't be spun orange man bad. FOX brings in any of those willing to debate and I have seen them on both the Hannity's and Carlson shows at FOX. They let both sides talk and then all I see of CNN are attempts to shame their guests who they can't believe doesn't see orange man as bad.

To be fair, I don't watch or listen to MSNBC/CBS / ABC "news" or opinions anymore since I declared them all liars. But I get to hear their hired ravbing lunatics on The Mark Levine show or I might watch it on a Tucker Carlson/Hannity type FOX opinion show now. I don't like FOX enough to keep them if they mess up.

edit on 22-9-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2019 @ 09:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

I don’t think you really spelled it out for the younger ones.

In 1984 when Ronald Reagan was re-elected, only Washington DC and Minnesota did not go to Reagan and Minnesota was Mondale’s home state.

For Minnesota to turn red, is kinda a big deal.



posted on Sep, 22 2019 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

You won't believe what happened next!

Better thread titles that describe what it's about!



new topics

top topics



 
63
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join