It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: stosh64
As a Straight,White,Tolerant Male... I feel I should shut up... That's what they want right?
originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: Zelun
Your not overly intelligent are you?..I addressed My Screen name already. I am a Buffalo Sabres Fan You stupid MF'er
Drugs....Not good for anyone
originally posted by: Zelun
a reply to: Raggedyman
I can't help that your particular brand of injustice took longer to shuck. Your government is responsible for its own injustices, just as mine is, the difference being that first we had to shuck YOUR brand of injustice before we could begin weeding out our own. Your suggestion that YOUR Suffragettes did more harm than good is pathetic. You know what, Raggedyman? You know what?
There's another phrase, it's that "violence never solved anything." Take a look at my signature. You'll find it to be more accurate. I'm happy to assert that violence never solved anything, except for the Norman conquest of southern Italy, the Hungarian-Ahtum war, the Byzantine-Georgian wars, Goryeo-Khitan war, the Ti Invasion, The Battle of Stiklestad, The Civil War in Georgia, the Uprising of Peter Delyan, the Byzantine wars, the Former Nine Years War, the Norman conquest of Sicily, the Breton-Norman war, the Norman conquest of England, the Norman invasion of Wales, the Kiev uprising of 1068, the Saxon Rebellion, the Revolt of the Earls, The Great Saxon Revolt, the Rebellion of 1088, the FiRsT CrUsAdEs, the SeCoNd CrUsAdEs, the Third and Fourth CrUsAdEs!, the Fifth CrUsAdeS, the Sixth thru Ninth CrUsAdEs, the First War of Scotish Independence, the Franco-Flemis war. Jesus, we're just now hitting 1300.
Then we have the Hundred Years' War from 1337-1453, then we have the War of the Roses from 1455-1487. Then we have the 1487 Flemish Revolt until 1492 when Columbus sailed the Ocean Blue. Jesus, it's almost like, for the entirety of human history violence has solved EvErYtHiNg! Every peace has been a result of war, and every war has been predicated by peace. Almost as if, and forgive me, humans prefer war?
And why wouldn't they? It solves problems. War has a great track record in the problem-solving category. And now, all of a sudden, you expect us to "give peace a chance?" We know what peace does! It makes people lazy and complacent and, I'm sorry, RiPe FoR tHe PiCkInG! Peace has solved nothing. It's only delayed war.
So how does this relate to our conversation? Your assertion that the Suffragettes in England, suing for the right to vote through violent means, delayed their desired result? Horse Manure. It made their desired result come sooner. Do you think that jihad can be a non-violent struggle? For a time, for a time. It can be a struggle in the mind and in the heart. Do you think jihad doesn't eventually end in war, and by war I mean in the conventional sense? Go ahead and ask history.
Islam means, literally, submission. Submission to Allah. The followers of Islam, the true followers, obey Allah. The "extremists," as we call them, carry out their deeds as an act of submission to Allah. So-called 'moderate' Muslims need to do a lot of soul searching. In their position I would be thinking about whether the extreme elements of their faith will have understanding and compassion for their 'moderate' position when it comes time to determine whether they are apostates, or whether they have been merely observing Kithman.